Changes for page Test

Last modified by Andrei Stefan on 2022/04/04 13:38

From version Icon 66.1 Icon
edited by Xinqi Li
on 2022/04/01 22:32
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 85.1 Icon
edited by Xinqi Li
on 2022/04/01 23:45
Change comment: Upload new image "Screenshot 2022-04-01 at 23.44.02.png", version 1.1

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -41,10 +41,19 @@
41 41  1. What did you dislike most about the robot?
42 42  1. Do you have any further suggestions? (*optional)
43 43  
44 -
45 -
46 46  == Tasks ==
47 47  
46 +The participants are asked to memorize the association between the given music and activities as best as they can during the play with the robot.
47 +The robot would play the music and ask the participant to answer the correct activity.
48 +In the end, the participant would do the final test and we count the number of correct answers.
49 +
50 +== Measures ==
51 +
52 +Count the correct answer in the final test.
53 +After the experiment, ask the user to fill in the system usability scale and the questionnaire regarding mood and satisfaction.
54 +
55 +== Procedure ==
56 +
48 48  **Event: Quiz**
49 49  
50 50  {{html}}
... ... @@ -82,17 +82,6 @@
82 82  <table>
83 83  {{/html}}
84 84  
85 -== Measures ==
86 -
87 -Count the correct answer in the final test.
88 -After the experiment, ask the user to fill in the system usability scale and the questionnaire regarding mood and satisfaction.
89 -
90 -== Procedure ==
91 -
92 -1. Sign the consent form;
93 -2. Complete the given tasks as instructed;
94 -3. Complete a questionnaire
95 -
96 96  == Material ==
97 97  
98 98  Robot(NAO) with setting music, consent form, laptop
... ... @@ -99,6 +99,11 @@
99 99  
100 100  = Results =
101 101  
100 +[[image:result2.png||height="400px"]]
101 +From the left figure, we can see the distribution of the number of correct answers. The average score of all participants is 3.6 among 6 questions. For group A, the average score is 3.3 and for group B the average score is 3.8. This bias can be explained because our group size is not large enough to eliminate the various memory ability. but we can also find that all participants in group A can learn something because they have no 0 scores but several participants in group B got 0 scores. In this degree, we can show that our robot does help in memory.
102 +
103 +From the middle figure, we can find that people in group A tend to think our robot can help improve the memory task and only a few of them thought our robot is annoying, as shown in the right figure.
104 +
102 102  = Discussion =
103 103  
104 104  = Conclusion =
Icon Screenshot 2022-04-01 at 23.43.46.png
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.mona98
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +217.7 KB
Content Icon
Icon Screenshot 2022-04-01 at 23.44.02.png
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.mona98
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +52.8 KB
Content Icon
Icon result1.png
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.mona98
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +107.3 KB
Content Icon
Icon result2.png
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.mona98
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +169.4 KB
Content Icon