Skip to Content

Changes for page Robotic Partner

Last modified by Andrei Stefan on 2022/04/04 12:11
From version Icon 6.5 Icon
edited by Andrei Stefan
on 2022/02/15 12:10
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 6.6 Icon
edited by Andrei Stefan
on 2022/02/15 12:10
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
2 2  
3 3  We want the robots to be able to interact with the users through more than just music, so robots such as Pepper, who has an in-built display or NAO, who can interact with a tablet, are considered more suitable than Miro. Furthermore, it might feel unnatural to hear an animal-shaped robot play music rather than animal sounds. A smaller robot, such as NAO, is more suitable when users live (more or less) independently, as it can be moved where it needs to be, does not take up a lot of space, and is also easier to take on walks. Furthermore, if the user regularly wisits care homes, they can take the robot with them without too much trouble.
4 4  
5 -===Goals===
5 +===**Goals**===
6 6  
7 7  The goals of the robotic partner are strongly correlated with the Problem Scenarios and the Use Cases.
8 8  
... ... @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
17 17  ====Reminiscence therapy====
18 18  Another avenue for using music is reminiscence therapy. Playing music that reminds the user of the "good old days" can help calm them down.
19 19  
20 -===Intended effects===
20 +===**Intended effects**===
21 21  
22 22  
23 23