Skip to Content

Changes for page Robotic Partner

Last modified by Andrei Stefan on 2022/04/04 12:11
From version Icon 6.2 Icon
edited by Andrei Stefan
on 2022/02/15 11:55
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 6.1 Icon
edited by Andrei Stefan
on 2022/02/15 11:49
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
1 1  ====Choice of robotic partner====
2 2  
3 -We want the robots to be able to interact with the users through more than just music, so robots such as Pepper, who has an in-built display or NAO, who can interact with a tablet, are considered more suitable than Miro. Furthermore, it might feel unnatural to hear an animal-shaped robot play music rather than animal sounds. A smaller robot, such as NAO, is more suitable when users live (more or less) independently, as it can be moved where it needs to be, does not take up a lot of space, and is also easier to take on walks. Furthermore, if the user regularly wisits care homes, they can take the robot with them without too much trouble.
3 + Therefore, robots such as Pepper, who has an in-built display or NAO, who can interact with a tablet, are considered more suitable than Miro.
4 4  
5 +
5 5  ===Goals===
6 6  
7 7  The goals of the robotic partner are strongly correlated with the Problem Scenarios and the Use Cases.
... ... @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
8 8  
9 9  ==== Daily routines====
10 10  
11 -The main goal of the robotic partner is to help users maintain their daily routines. Towards this end, the robot should be able to display a list of tasks and should also help the users remember to do them. Therefore, the robot should have access to a tablet which can show the list when needed.
12 +The main goal of the robotic partner is to help users maintain their daily routines. Towards this end, the robot should be able to display a list of tasks and should also help the users remember to do them.
12 12  
13 13  ====Reducing memory deterioration====
14 14