Skip to Content

Wiki source code of Claims

Version 9.3 by Andrei Stefan on 2022/04/03 17:20
Hide last authors
Andrei Stefan 9.2 1 == Basic claims ==
2 The following claims are based on the use cases.
Andrei Stefan 1.2 3
Andrei Stefan 9.2 4 CL001: The patient can associate music they hear with activities they need to do.
5 Given enough practice, the patient should be able to make a connection between the music and the tasks.
Andrei Stefan 1.2 6
Andrei Stefan 9.2 7 CL002: The user can tell if the robot knows they completed the task.
8 It is good to include some confirmation from the robot, so that the patients know that the robot knows that they are donw with the task and is not stuck waiting for a reply.
Andrei Stefan 1.3 9
Andrei Stefan 9.2 10 CL003: It is easier to contact the caregiver.
11 It is also possible to just include the caregiver's contact information when setting up the robot.
Andrei Stefan 2.1 12
Andrei Stefan 9.2 13 CL004: Customizable settings make it easier for the patient to remember the correct activity.
14 By allowing the users to pick music that they like or that they feel fits well with an activity, it should be easier for them to remember the connection.
Xinqi Li 4.1 15
Andrei Stefan 9.2 16 CL005: Seeing the robot move along when exercising motivates the patient to keep exercising.
17 Having a partner to exercise with is a good motivator to keep exercising. Could also link with RQ008: The robot can detect movements, to correct the user on their posture.
18
19 CL006: Data helps design better exercise routines.
20 By keeping track of exercise sessions and the patient's status during them, it is possible to optimize the workout program and fit it better to the user.
21
22 CL007: Analysis can point out other health issues, if any.
23 By looking at physical activity data over time, it is possible to spot patterns which point to physical ailments.
24
25 CL008: It is possible to detect unresponsive patients.
26 Movement is an essential part of interacting, so if the robot is able to detect the lack of movement mid conversation, it can deduce that the patient is unresponsive.
27
28 == General claims ==
29 CL011: Patient's health improves.
Andrei Stefan 9.3 30 By exercising regularly and talking with the robot, both physical and mental health are expected to improve.
Andrei Stefan 9.2 31
32 CL012: Patient is happy to interact with the robot.
Andrei Stefan 9.3 33 It is crucial that the user experience is positive in quality, to ensure that the patient doesn't view using the robot as a chore, as this might negatively impact their health.
Andrei Stefan 9.2 34
35 == Tested claims ==
36 The following claims are derived based on the basic ones for the quiz use case, and are the ones targeted in the evaluation.
37
38 CL101: People with dementia remember their tasks easier if they are associated with a piece of music.
39 The main objective of the robot is to make and reinforce the connection between music and task, so that the reminders would be gentler, in the form of a music fragment, rathern that directly reminding the patients wath to do.
40
41 CL102: By practicing with the NAO, the connection between activity and music gets stronger over time.
42
43
Dongxu Lu 9.1 44 **TODO:**
45 Can have analysis on the pros and cons that may happen with each stakeholder
46 Maybe change claims into these? Need more
Dongxu Lu 8.1 47 The patient recalls what to do after hearing certain music
Dongxu Lu 9.1 48 The patient memorizes the activities better through quizzes.
49 The patient becomes physically healthier.
Dongxu Lu 7.1 50 The patient is happy with using the robot.