Changes for page TimeTable Table Format

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -1,50 +1,51 @@
	1	+= Week 1 =
1	1
2		-= Week 1=
3	3
4		-
5		-|Member|Task|Reflection|
6		-|Tim Huisman|Check if the MiRo robot can listen to a name/respond to a name|The accounts weren't there yet so Harmen, Jeffrey, Tim, and Laura did some research on the necessary packages and code.|
7		-|Harmen Kroon| Look into the sounds help|The accounts weren't there yet so Harmen, Jeffrey, Tim, and Laura did some research on the necessary packages and code.|
8		-|Jeffrey Lim|Look at the basic behavior of the MiRo robot (and maybe try it a bit)|The accounts weren't there yet so Harmen, Jeffrey, Tim, and Laura did some research on the necessary packages and code.|
9		-|Doreen Mulder|See if Bluetooth connection with MiRo would be possible (and if we can check distance)|Doreen made connections between her phone and an Arduino and was able to let the Arduino detect when the distance was too great.|
10		-|Laura Ottevanger|Check and possibly code a path tracking possibility in MiRo|The accounts weren't there yet so Harmen, Jeffrey, Tim, and Laura did some research on the necessary packages and code.|
11		-|Rohan Sobha|Work on the report: Operational demands: environments and stakeholders|Rohan made the Environments and Stakeholders.|
12		-|Ricardo Vogel| Work on the report: Personas and problem scenario|Ricardo made personas.|
	4	+|Member|Task|Reflection|\\
	5	+|Tim Huisman|Check if the MiRo robot can listen to a name/respond to a name|The accounts weren't there yet so Harmen, Jeffrey, Tim, and Laura did some research on the necessary packages and code.|\\
	6	+|Harmen Kroon| Look into the sounds help|The accounts weren't there yet so Harmen, Jeffrey, Tim, and Laura did some research on the necessary packages and code.|\\
	7	+|Jeffrey Lim|Look at the basic behavior of the MiRo robot (and maybe try it a bit)|The accounts weren't there yet so Harmen, Jeffrey, Tim, and Laura did some research on the necessary packages and code.|\\
	8	+|Doreen Mulder|See if Bluetooth connection with MiRo would be possible (and if we can check distance)|Doreen made connections between her phone and an Arduino and was able to let the Arduino detect when the distance was too great.|\\
	9	+|Laura Ottevanger|Check and possibly code a path tracking possibility in MiRo|The accounts weren't there yet so Harmen, Jeffrey, Tim, and Laura did some research on the necessary packages and code.|\\
	10	+|Rohan Sobha|Work on the report: Operational demands: environments and stakeholders|Rohan made the Environments and Stakeholders.|\\
	11	+|Ricardo Vogel| Work on the report: Personas and problem scenario|Ricardo made personas.|\\
13	13	|All|In the meeting (8-2) tasks were divided. The deadline is before the meeting next week.| |
14	14
15		-=Week 2=
	14	+= Week 2 =
16	16
17		-|Member|Task|Reflection|
	16	+|Member|Task|Reflection|\\
18	18	|Tim Huisman|Commandos/voice recognition, help with personas & scenarios|Tim did research on voice recognition and which Python packages are necessary to implement that.
19		-|
20		-|Harmen Kroon| Harmen: Problem scenarios|Harmen made the problem scenario.|
21		-|Jeffrey Lim| Look into basic behavior, what does the dog do when touched/petted, etc.|Jeffrey tested out with the blockly environment and the Python conversion.|
22		-|Doreen Mulder|State diagram / Leash|Doreen made a flowchart about the behavior of the robot.|
23		-|Laura Ottevanger|Look into pathmaking |Laura made the first storyboard.|
24		-|Rohan Sobha|Robotic Partner / Music recognition|Rohan made the part on Robotic Partner and Music recognition|
	18	+|\\
	19	+|Harmen Kroon| Harmen: Problem scenarios|Harmen made the problem scenario.|\\
	20	+|Jeffrey Lim| Look into basic behavior, what does the dog do when touched/petted, etc.|Jeffrey tested out with the blockly environment and the Python conversion.|\\
	21	+|Doreen Mulder|State diagram / Leash|Doreen made a flowchart about the behavior of the robot.|\\
	22	+|Laura Ottevanger|Look into pathmaking |Laura made the first storyboard.|\\
	23	+|Rohan Sobha|Robotic Partner / Music recognition|Rohan made the part on Robotic Partner and Music recognition|\\
25	25	|Ricardo Vogel|Personas & persona scenarios|Ricardo extended the personas and made persona scenario.|
26	26	|All|In the meeting (15-2) tasks were divided. The deadline is before the meeting next week. |Wednesday morning we went to the robot lab and were able to upload a basic program to the robot. |
27	27
28		-=Week 3=
29		-|Member|Task|Reflection|
30		-|Tim Huisman|Work on Objectives, and Humanoid Robot, and check if name recognition is possible without the mdk|Made the Objectives and worked on humanoid Robot. Tim also found some Python libraries for name recognition. Tim also made user value stories for stakeholders |
31		-|Harmen Kroon|Make Ontology|Figured out the program to create an ontology but did not create the ontology yet|
32		-|Jeffrey Lim|Work on use cases, figure out object/wall detection|Did not work on use cases yet but did take a look at the color detection of the MiRo|
33		-|Doreen Mulder|Extending the problem scenario section, and attempt at installing the MDK.|Installed the MDK and made an explanation on how to install it. Doreen did not extend the problem scenario yet.|
34		-|Laura Ottevanger|Make the rest of the storyboards and make the test program|Made the storyboards and some test programs to test on the robot. |
35		-|Rohan Sobha|Make Claims|Made the claims|
36		-|Ricardo Vogel|Make Design Patterns|Made the Design Patterns with a drawing of the system.|
	27	+= Week 3 =
	28	+
	29	+|Member|Task|Reflection|\\
	30	+|Tim Huisman|Work on Objectives, and Humanoid Robot, and check if name recognition is possible without the mdk|Made the Objectives and worked on humanoid Robot. Tim also found some Python libraries for name recognition. Tim also made user value stories for stakeholders |\\
	31	+|Harmen Kroon|Make Ontology|Figured out the program to create an ontology but did not create the ontology yet|\\
	32	+|Jeffrey Lim|Work on use cases, figure out object/wall detection|Did not work on use cases yet but did take a look at the color detection of the MiRo|\\
	33	+|Doreen Mulder|Extending the problem scenario section, and attempt at installing the MDK.|Installed the MDK and made an explanation on how to install it. Doreen did not extend the problem scenario yet.|\\
	34	+|Laura Ottevanger|Make the rest of the storyboards and make the test program|Made the storyboards and some test programs to test on the robot. |\\
	35	+|Rohan Sobha|Make Claims|Made the claims|\\
	36	+|Ricardo Vogel|Make Design Patterns|Made the Design Patterns with a drawing of the system.|\\
37	37	|All|In the meeting (22-2) tasks were divided. |We used Wednesday morning as our lab hours to work on the physical prototype with the MiRo. The MiRo had quite some difficulties in connecting with PCs|
38	38
39		-=Week 4=
40		-|Member|Task|Reflection|
41		-|Tim Huisman|Extend functions and specify design patterns|Worked on design patterns and the human factors design patterns. Extended/rewrote functions and found parts to discuss for during the lab.|
42		-|Harmen Kroon|Make the Ontology and write the human factors ontology page|Made ontology. Started on human factors ontology, made some code for demo|
43		-|Jeffrey Lim|Use Cases and work on mid-term presentation |Made use cases and presented presentation|
44		-|Doreen Mulder|Extend the problem scenario and work on the wristband for the prototype. Also, make a "hondenriem" prototype (out of cardboard)|Extended problem scenario, and started working on a physical prototype|
45		-|Laura Ottevanger|Work on Evaluation and work on mid-term presentation |Made and presented the presentation, made a start on evaluation and made some code for the demo.|
46		-|Rohan Sobha|Work on Evaluation and work on mid-term presentation |Made a start on evaluation, made the presentation, and presented the presentation.|
47		-|Ricardo Vogel|Specify design patterns and work on the human factors design patterns page|Worked on design patterns and the human factors design patterns|
	39	+= Week 4 =
	40	+
	41	+|Member|Task|Reflection|\\
	42	+|Tim Huisman|Extend functions and specify design patterns|Worked on design patterns and the human factors design patterns. Extended/rewrote functions and found parts to discuss for during the lab.|\\
	43	+|Harmen Kroon|Make the Ontology and write the human factors ontology page|Made ontology. Started on human factors ontology, made some code for demo|\\
	44	+|Jeffrey Lim|Use Cases and work on mid-term presentation |Made use cases and presented presentation|\\
	45	+|Doreen Mulder|Extend the problem scenario and work on the wristband for the prototype. Also, make a "hondenriem" prototype (out of cardboard)|Extended problem scenario, and started working on a physical prototype|\\
	46	+|Laura Ottevanger|Work on Evaluation and work on mid-term presentation |Made and presented the presentation, made a start on evaluation and made some code for the demo.|\\
	47	+|Rohan Sobha|Work on Evaluation and work on mid-term presentation |Made a start on evaluation, made the presentation, and presented the presentation.|\\
	48	+|Ricardo Vogel|Specify design patterns and work on the human factors design patterns page|Worked on design patterns and the human factors design patterns|\\
48	48	|All|In the meeting (1-3) tasks were divided. |In addition to the common Wednesday morning in the Insyght lab, Rohan, Jeffrey, and Laura spend Wednesday afternoon working on the presentation. In the lab we made some small videos for the mid-term presentation:
49	49
50	50	* Snoezelen = for which we will use the demo version of MiRo,
...	...	@@ -54,20 +54,25 @@
54	54	* Ask for attention = Harmen and Laura look into mimicking a barking dog
55	55	* Positive response = Laura will create some code where MiRo is barking, wagging its tail, etc. |
56	56
57		-=Week 5= Mid-term presentation
58		-|Member|Task|Reflection|
59		-|Tim Huisman|Design pattern diagrams, reread all XWiki pages to check for consistency and todos. Also, refactor some pages|Reread all XWiki pages to check for consistency and made a full to-do list for the rest of the project. Also gave feedback on the evaluation form|
60		-|Harmen Kroon|Make an extra ontology schema, make human factors ontology, and do some research on existing robot dogs|Due to Harmen being sick, he worked a little bit on some research for existing robot dogs but couldn't finish ontology.|
61		-|Jeffrey Lim|Make some MiRo code for an alarm when a PwD falls and for snoezelen with different levels of movement.|Made and tested the four pieces of code Wednesday. |
62		-|Doreen Mulder|Elaborate on evaluation and collaborate with Rohan on experimental setup|Elaborated evaluation and worked on experimental setup|
63		-|Laura Ottevanger|Also do some research on existing robot dogs and make 4 pieces of code for the prototypes: snoezelen low movement, medium movement, a lot of movement, and the alarm mode|Started with some research on existing robot dogs and made the four prototypes mentioned|
64		-|Rohan Sobha| Elaborate on evaluation and collaborate with Doreen on experimental setup|Elaborated evaluation and worked on experimental setup|
65		-|Ricardo Vogel|Going to work on ethics and test if we can connect MiRo to a server and/or with packets|Worked on ethics|
	58	+= Week 5 =
	59	+
	60	+ Mid-term presentation
	61	+
	62	+|Member|Task|Reflection|\\
	63	+|Tim Huisman|Design pattern diagrams, reread all XWiki pages to check for consistency and todos. Also, refactor some pages|Reread all XWiki pages to check for consistency and made a full to-do list for the rest of the project. Also gave feedback on the evaluation form|\\
	64	+|Harmen Kroon|Make an extra ontology schema, make human factors ontology, and do some research on existing robot dogs|Due to Harmen being sick, he worked a little bit on some research for existing robot dogs but couldn't finish ontology.|\\
	65	+|Jeffrey Lim|Make some MiRo code for an alarm when a PwD falls and for snoezelen with different levels of movement.|Made and tested the four pieces of code Wednesday. |\\
	66	+|Doreen Mulder|Elaborate on evaluation and collaborate with Rohan on experimental setup|Elaborated evaluation and worked on experimental setup|\\
	67	+|Laura Ottevanger|Also do some research on existing robot dogs and make 4 pieces of code for the prototypes: snoezelen low movement, medium movement, a lot of movement, and the alarm mode|Started with some research on existing robot dogs and made the four prototypes mentioned|\\
	68	+|Rohan Sobha| Elaborate on evaluation and collaborate with Doreen on experimental setup|Elaborated evaluation and worked on experimental setup|\\
	69	+|Ricardo Vogel|Going to work on ethics and test if we can connect MiRo to a server and/or with packets|Worked on ethics|\\
66	66	|All|In the meeting (9-3) tasks were divided. This was in the Insyght lab as during the lecture hours there were presentations|We decided to combine the pieces of code for alarm from Jeffrey and Laura to create an alarm mode. The snoezelen we decided to scrap as we noticed that it would be difficult to test snoezelen with the MiRo, the MiRo is too easy to break|
67	67
68		-=Week 6 and 7=
69		-|Member|Task|Reflection|
70		-|Tim Huisman|
	72	+= Week 6 and 7 =
	73	+
	74	+|Member|Task|Reflection|\\
	75	+|Tim Huisman|\\
	76	+
71	71	* Update flowchart to remove snoezelen to be coherent with the current idea of MiRo
72	72	* Add a textual description of walking with MiRo to incorporate what MiRo should do if PwD stops to talk during the walk
73	73	* Create value stories for indirect stakeholders
...	...	@@ -74,58 +74,88 @@
74	74	* Incorporate Schwartz's value model in the value stories
75	75	* Describe every single signal, sound, a movement that the PwD will receive/MiRo will make, the reasoning behind it, and its desired effect
76	76	* Link to Technology - Music Management for the explanation of why we do not use music.
77		-|* Updated flowchart
	83	+
	84	+|\\
	85	+
	86	+* Updated flowchart
78	78	* Added the textual description
79	79	* -
80	80	* -
81	81	* Describing the sounds has been completed in the final week.
82	82	* Link to technology has been completed in the final week.
83		-|
84		-|Harmen Kroon|
	92	+
	93	+|\\
	94	+|Harmen Kroon|\\
	95	+
85	85	* Add research on interactions between elderly people and/or PwD's and robots + any other relevant research on the effect of pets/robots on PwD's.
86	86	* Add ontology image to XWiki
87		-|
	98	+
	99	+|\\
	100	+
88	88	* Added research on existing robots/dogs
89	89	* Ontology image has been added
90		-|
91		-|Jeffrey Lim|
	103	+
	104	+|\\
	105	+|Jeffrey Lim|\\
	106	+
92	92	* Expand product vision with Snoezelen and check incorporation in objectives
93	93	* Explain why music is not suitable for our goal/case
94		-|
	109	+
	110	+|\\
	111	+
95	95	* -
96		-* - |
97		-|Doreen Mulder|
	113	+* -
	114	+
	115	+|\\
	116	+|Doreen Mulder|\\
	117	+
98	98	* Add sources for self-determination theory claims
99	99	* Look into "Design scenarios" (lecture 3 probably): a story that conveys a new vision, including activity: narratives of typical or critical services, information: details on info provision, interaction: details of user interaction & feedback
100	100	* Write inclusive design page
101	101	* Change every mention of Miro to MiRo
102	102	* Write in Evaluation the Test about the little interview she had with Erik and how the product was perceived by a hard-of-hearing person.
103		-|
	123	+
	124	+|\\
	125	+
104	104	* Added the sources for SDT claims
105	105	* Worked on the Design Scenarios.
106	106	* Inclusive design page has been created.
107	107	* Made MiRo consistent
108	108	* Write an evaluation on a hard-of-hearing person
109		-|
110		-|Laura Ottevanger|
	131	+
	132	+|\\
	133	+|Laura Ottevanger|\\
	134	+
111	111	* Review use cases
112	112	* Add a future work page indicating our future work, and also that we would have liked to incorporate snoezelen
113	113	* Elaborate on limitations of MiRo
114	114	* Add research on interactions between elderly people and/or PwD's and robots + any other relevant research on the effect of pets/robots on PwD's.
115		-|
	139	+
	140	+|\\
	141	+
116	116	* Reviewed use cases and made small changes
117		-* Asked for the future work page and mentioned snoezelen in future work|
118		-|Rohan Sobha|
	143	+* Asked for the future work page and mentioned snoezelen in future work
	144	+* Elaborated on the limitations
	145	+* Did research on existing robots
	146	+
	147	+|
	148	+
	149	+|Rohan Sobha|\\
	150	+
119	119	* Review current claims and perhaps add upon sections with small amounts of text/description
120	120	* Add sources on why autonomy is important (basically just link to Self Determination Theory)
121	121	* Check if we can validate claims with evaluation
122	122	* Elaborate on limitations of MiRo
123	123	* Added research on existing robots/dogs
124		-|
	156	+
	157	+|\\
	158	+
125	125	* Reviewed current claims
126	126	* Added the sources on why autonomy is important
127	127	* Validated claims with evaluation|
128		-|Ricardo Vogel|
	162	+
	163	+|Ricardo Vogel|\\
	164	+
129	129	* Lecture slides state "Persona's need to have goals". Cornelia and Constantijn have these (to some extent), but Marcus does not yet
130	130	* Create a technology disliking persona scenario
131	131	* Create for each scenario a 'before' and 'after technology' piece
...	...	@@ -132,7 +132,9 @@
132	132	* Make team design pattern into something that is not drawn
133	133	* Make team design pattern including the caretaker
134	134	* Create diagrams for IDP's
135		-|
	171	+
	172	+|\\
	173	+
136	136	* Added goals for Marcus
137	137	* Created a new persona
138	138	* Created for each scenario a 'before' and 'after technology' piece
...	...	@@ -139,60 +139,81 @@
139	139	* Completed new design pattern drawing in the final week
140	140	* Completed including the caretaker in the final week
141	141	* -
142		-|
143		-|All|In the meeting (15-3) tasks were divided to work on for week 6 and week 7|In week 6 we did the first test run of the evaluation and in week 7 we performed the entire evaluation. In addition to their tasks, Doreen, Tim, Ricardo, and Harmen created the presentation.|
144	144
145		-=Week 8= End presentation
146		-|Member|Task|Reflection|
147		-|Tim Huisman|
	181	+|\\
	182	+|All|In the meeting (15-3) tasks were divided to work on for week 6 and week 7|In week 6 we did the first test run of the evaluation and in week 7 we performed the entire evaluation. In addition to their tasks, Doreen, Tim, Ricardo, and Harmen created the presentation.|\\
	183	+
	184	+= Week 8 =
	185	+
	186	+ End presentation
	187	+
	188	+|Member|Task|Reflection|\\
	189	+|Tim Huisman|\\
	190	+
148	148	* Robotic Partner: Read through robotic partner and add one citation in the todo
149	149	* Objectives: Remove Snoezelen from Objectives and expand Objectives
150	150	* Future work: Move everything Snoezelen related to future work and make a coherent story
151	151	* Future work: Write about the suggestions for other tests from the presentation in Future work e.g. test way of attention-grabbing
152	152	* Conclusion: Write a nice end chapter/conclusion on how it went and summarize the results.
153		-|
	196	+
	197	+|\\
	198	+
154	154	* Changed robotic partner and added the citation
155	155	* Removed Snoezelen and expanded Objectives
156	156	* Move everything Snoezelen related to future work and make a coherent story
157	157	* Wrote about other tests in future work
158	158	* Wrote the conclusion and summary
159		-|
160		-|Harmen Kroon|
	204	+
	205	+|\\
	206	+|Harmen Kroon|\\
	207	+
161	161	* Stakeholders and Problem Scenario: Write 2 sentences as an intro for stakeholders and problem scenario
162	162	* Stakeholders and Problem Scenario: Read through the stakeholders and problem scenario
163	163	* Human factors - Design pattern and ontology: Cite some references in Ontology
164	164	* Claims: Expand Claims
165	165	* Ontology: Add a second Ontology
166		-|
	213	+
	214	+|\\
	215	+
167	167	* Intro has been written
168	168	* Has been read through
169	169	* Cited some references in Ontology
170	170	* Expanded claims
171	171	* Added extra ontology
172		-|
173		-|Jeffrey Lim|
	221	+
	222	+|\\
	223	+|Jeffrey Lim|\\
	224	+
174	174	* Music and Cognition: Explanation of how doglike sounds and movements could be beneficial based on literature and motivate why music is inappropriate for our use case.
175	175	* Group's core theoretical foundation: Talk about people with dementia getting lost, if walking helps by PwD, how good walking is for people, budget care homes
176	176	* Music management: Explanation of why we do not use music + what we do use + talk about the video of alarm here
177	177	* Future Work: Add limitations and how we would solve them in future work.
178		-|
	229	+
	230	+|\\
	231	+
179	179	* Added why doglike sounds are beneficial for walking and added a small chapter on music and cognition
180	180	* Wrote text in the theoretical foundation
181	181	* -
182	182	* -
183		-|
184		-|Doreen Mulder|
	236	+
	237	+|\\
	238	+|Doreen Mulder|\\
	239	+
185	185	* Measuring Instruments: cite papers about what we use for evaluation
186	186	* Inclusive design: Clean up sources or notify what needs to be done on the page
187	187	* Discussion: Add Discussion after the results and ensure that the results are just numbers
188	188	* Future work: Talk about having only 8 participants, not a correct room (not a care home hallway but a single room), using PwD as test subjects = more realistic test.
189		-|
	244	+
	245	+|\\
	246	+
190	190	* Cited papers in teamwork with Rohan
191	191	* Added sources and created the page
192	192	* Added Discussion and changed results
193	193	* Has been put in Test as it might suit better for now
194		-|
195		-|Laura Ottevanger|
	251	+
	252	+|\\
	253	+|Laura Ottevanger|\\
	254	+
196	196	* Introduction - Rewrite: problem, solution, what is where.
197	197	* Technology: Move MiRo difficulties to Technology
198	198	* Technology: Specify specific limitations and technical options for MiRo
...	...	@@ -200,7 +200,9 @@
200	200	* Prototype: Talk about the code in the Prototype chapter
201	201	* Future Work: Add limitations and how we would solve them in future work.
202	202	* Perform Wilcoxon test on test data
203		-|
	262	+
	263	+|\\
	264	+
204	204	* Created a small introduction
205	205	* Rewrote difficulties a bit to add it to Technology
206	206	* Specified specific limitations and technical options for MiRo for the next group as well
...	...	@@ -208,8 +208,10 @@
208	208	* Talked about the code in the Prototype chapter
209	209	* Added limitations and how we would solve them in future work.
210	210	* Wilcoxon test has been performed
211		-|
212		-|Rohan Sobha|
	272	+
	273	+|\\
	274	+|Rohan Sobha|\\
	275	+
213	213	* Measuring Instruments: cite papers about what we use for evaluation
214	214	* Human-agent teamwork: Talk about humans and robots working together based on literature
215	215	* Use cases: Read through and check for (grammatical) mistakes
...	...	@@ -216,7 +216,9 @@
216	216	* Test: Rewrite to make it a bit more specific, ensure that the test is reproducible, add the Wilcoxon test
217	217	* Future work: Add Snoezelen in the context of the evaluation
218	218	* Conclusion: Write a nice end chapter/conclusion on how it went and summarize the results.
219		-|
	282	+
	283	+|\\
	284	+
220	220	* Cited papers in teamwork with Doreen
221	221	* Added the Human-agent teamwork page and elaborated on working together
222	222	* Use cases have been read through
...	...	@@ -223,18 +223,23 @@
223	223	* Test page has been rewritten to adhere to the requirements
224	224	* Added Snoezelen in future work
225	225	* Wrote a nice end chapter/conclusion.
226		-|
227		-|Ricardo Vogel|
	291	+
	292	+|\\
	293	+|Ricardo Vogel|\\
	294	+
228	228	* Environments and Personas: Write 2 sentences as an intro on the basic Operational Demands page.
229	229	* Environments and Personas: Read through and check if correct.
230	230	* Human factors - Design pattern and ontology: Cite some references
231	231	* Design patterns: Reread and change picture
232	232	* Design patterns: Add caretaker in team design pattern
233		-|
	300	+
	301	+|\\
	302	+
234	234	* The introduction for Environments and Personas has been made
235	235	* Have been read through
236	236	* References in the design patterns have been made
237	237	* New picture has been created
238	238	* Caretaker has been added
239		-|
	308	+
	309	+|\\
240	240	|All|The final presentation occurred. Doreen, Tim, Ricardo, and Harmen did the presentation. We divided tasks at 31-3 and 1-4 |We evaluated the tasks on 5-4.|