Changes for page TimeTable Table Format

Last modified by Laura Ottevanger on 2022/04/05 10:59

From 1.4 to 1.3 From 2.2 to 2.1

From version

2.1

edited by Laura Ottevanger
on 2022/04/05 10:52

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

To version

1.4

edited by Laura Ottevanger
on 2022/04/05 10:43

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Raw
Rendered

Summary

Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

@@ -145,11 +145,11 @@
  =Week 8= End presentation
  |Member|Task|Reflection|
  |Tim Huisman|
--* Robotic Partner: Read through robotic partner and add one citation in the todo
--* Objectives: Remove Snoezelen from Objectives and expand Objectives
--* Future work: Move everything Snoezelen related to future work and make a coherent story
--* Future work: Write about the suggestions for other tests from the presentation in Future work e.g. test way of attention-grabbing
--*  Conclusion: Write a nice end chapter/conclusion on how it went and summarize the results.
++* Read through robotic partner and add one citation in the todo
++* Remove Snoezelen from Objectives and expand Objectives
++* Move everything Snoezelen related to future work and make a coherent story
++* Write about the suggestions for other tests from the presentation in Future work e.g. test way of attention-grabbing
++*  Write a nice end chapter/conclusion on how it went and summarize the results.
  |
  * Changed robotic partner and added the citation
  * Removed Snoezelen and expanded Objectives
@@ -158,11 +158,11 @@
  * Wrote the conclusion and summary
  |
  |Harmen Kroon|
--* Stakeholders and Problem Scenario: Write 2 sentences as an intro for stakeholders and problem scenario
--* Stakeholders and Problem Scenario: Read through the stakeholders and problem scenario
--* Human factors - Design pattern and ontology: Cite some references in Ontology
--* Claims: Expand Claims
--* Ontology: Add a second Ontology
++* Write 2 sentences as an intro for stakeholders and problem scenario
++* Read through stakeholders and problem scenario
++* Cite some references in Ontology
++* Expand Claims
++* Add second Ontology
  |
  * Intro has been written
  * Has been read through
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@
  * Music and Cognition: Explanation of how doglike sounds and movements could be beneficial based on literature and motivate why music is inappropriate for our use case.
  * Group's core theoretical foundation: Talk about people with dementia getting lost, if walking helps by PwD, how good walking is for people, budget care homes
  * Music management: Explanation of why we do not use music + what we do use + talk about the video of alarm here
--* Future Work: Add limitations and how we would solve them in future work.
++* Add limitations and how we would solve them in future work.
  |
  * Added why doglike sounds are beneficial for walking and added a small chapter on music and cognition
  * Wrote text in the theoretical foundation
@@ -184,8 +184,8 @@
  |Doreen Mulder|
  * Measuring Instruments: cite papers about what we use for evaluation
  * Inclusive design: Clean up sources or notify what needs to be done on the page
--* Discussion: Add Discussion after the results and ensure that the results are just numbers
--* Future work: Talk about having only 8 participants, not a correct room (not a care home hallway but a single room), using PwD as test subjects = more realistic test.
++* Add Discussion after the results and ensure that the results are just numbers
++* In future work: Talk about having only 8 participants, not a correct room (not a care home hallway but a single room), using PwD as test subjects = more realistic test.
  |
  * Cited papers in teamwork with Rohan
  * Added sources and created the page
@@ -194,12 +194,12 @@
  |
  |Laura Ottevanger|
  * Introduction - Rewrite: problem, solution, what is where.
--* Technology: Move MiRo difficulties to Technology
--* Technology: Specify specific limitations and technical options for MiRo
++* Move MiRo difficulties to Technology
++* Specify specific limitations and technical options for MiRo
  * Add code to Gitlab
--* Prototype: Talk about the code in the Prototype chapter
--* Future Work: Add limitations and how we would solve them in future work.
--* Perform Wilcoxon test on test data
++* Talk about the code in the Prototype chapter
++* Add limitations and how we would solve them in future work.
++* Perform Wilcoxon test on testdata
  |
  * Created a small introduction
  * Rewrote difficulties a bit to add it to Technology
@@ -214,8 +214,8 @@
  * Human-agent teamwork: Talk about humans and robots working together based on literature
  * Use cases: Read through and check for (grammatical) mistakes
  * Test: Rewrite to make it a bit more specific, ensure that the test is reproducible, add the Wilcoxon test
--* Future work: Add Snoezelen in the context of the evaluation
--* Conclusion: Write a nice end chapter/conclusion on how it went and summarize the results.
++* Future work: Add Snoezelen in context of evaluation
++* Conclusion: Write a nice end chapter/conclusion on how it went and summarizing results.
  |
  * Cited papers in teamwork with Doreen
  * Added the Human-agent teamwork page and elaborated on working together
@@ -225,16 +225,8 @@
  * Wrote a nice end chapter/conclusion.
  |
  |Ricardo Vogel|
--* Environments and Personas: Write 2 sentences as an intro on the basic Operational Demands page.
--* Environments and Personas: Read through and check if correct.
--* Human factors - Design pattern and ontology: Cite some references
--* Design patterns: Reread and change picture
--* Design patterns: Add caretaker in team design pattern
++
  |
--* The introduction for Environments and Personas has been made
--* Have been read through
--* References in the design patterns have been made
--* New picture has been created
--* Caretaker has been added
++
  |
  |All|The final presentation occurred. Doreen, Tim, Ricardo, and Harmen did the presentation. We divided tasks at 31-3 and 1-4 |We evaluated the tasks on 5-4.|