Changes for page TimeTable Table Format

Last modified by Laura Ottevanger on 2022/04/05 10:59

From 1.2 to 1.1 From 2.2 to 2.1

From version

2.1

edited by Laura Ottevanger
on 2022/04/05 10:52

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

To version

1.2

edited by Laura Ottevanger
on 2022/04/05 10:10

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Raw
Rendered

Summary

Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

@@ -99,13 +99,13 @@
  * Look into "Design scenarios" (lecture 3 probably): a story that conveys a new vision, including activity: narratives of typical or critical services, information: details on info provision, interaction: details of user interaction & feedback
  * Write inclusive design page
  * Change every mention of Miro to MiRo
--* Write in Evaluation the Test about the little interview she had with Erik and how the product was perceived by a hard-of-hearing person.
++* Write in Evaluation the Test about the little interview she had with Erik and how the product was perceived by a hard of hearing person.
  |
  * Added the sources for SDT claims
  * Worked on the Design Scenarios.
  * Inclusive design page has been created.
  * Made MiRo consistent
--* Write an evaluation on a hard-of-hearing person
++* Write evaluation on hard of hearing person
  |
  |Laura Ottevanger|
  * Review use cases
@@ -140,101 +140,15 @@
  * Completed including the caretaker in the final week
  * -
  |
--|All|In the meeting (15-3) tasks were divided to work on for week 6 and week 7|In week 6 we did the first test run of the evaluation and in week 7 we performed the entire evaluation. In addition to their tasks, Doreen, Tim, Ricardo, and Harmen created the presentation.|
++|All|In the meeting (15-3) tasks were divided to work on for week 6 and week 7|In week 6 we did the first test run of the evaluation and in week 7 we performed the entire evaluation.|
  =Week 8= End presentation
  |Member|Task|Reflection|
--|Tim Huisman|
--* Robotic Partner: Read through robotic partner and add one citation in the todo
--* Objectives: Remove Snoezelen from Objectives and expand Objectives
--* Future work: Move everything Snoezelen related to future work and make a coherent story
--* Future work: Write about the suggestions for other tests from the presentation in Future work e.g. test way of attention-grabbing
--*  Conclusion: Write a nice end chapter/conclusion on how it went and summarize the results.
--|
--* Changed robotic partner and added the citation
--* Removed Snoezelen and expanded Objectives
--* Move everything Snoezelen related to future work and make a coherent story
--* Wrote about other tests in future work
--* Wrote the conclusion and summary
--|
--|Harmen Kroon|
--* Stakeholders and Problem Scenario: Write 2 sentences as an intro for stakeholders and problem scenario
--* Stakeholders and Problem Scenario: Read through the stakeholders and problem scenario
--* Human factors - Design pattern and ontology: Cite some references in Ontology
--* Claims: Expand Claims
--* Ontology: Add a second Ontology
--|
--* Intro has been written
--* Has been read through
--* Cited some references in Ontology
--* Expanded claims
--* Added extra ontology
--|
--|Jeffrey Lim|
--* Music and Cognition: Explanation of how doglike sounds and movements could be beneficial based on literature and motivate why music is inappropriate for our use case.
--* Group's core theoretical foundation: Talk about people with dementia getting lost, if walking helps by PwD, how good walking is for people, budget care homes
--* Music management: Explanation of why we do not use music + what we do use + talk about the video of alarm here
--* Future Work: Add limitations and how we would solve them in future work.
--|
--* Added why doglike sounds are beneficial for walking and added a small chapter on music and cognition
--* Wrote text in the theoretical foundation
--* -
--* -
--|
--|Doreen Mulder|
--* Measuring Instruments: cite papers about what we use for evaluation
--* Inclusive design: Clean up sources or notify what needs to be done on the page
--* Discussion: Add Discussion after the results and ensure that the results are just numbers
--* Future work: Talk about having only 8 participants, not a correct room (not a care home hallway but a single room), using PwD as test subjects = more realistic test.
--|
--* Cited papers in teamwork with Rohan
--* Added sources and created the page
--* Added Discussion and changed results
--* Has been put in Test as it might suit better for now
--|
--|Laura Ottevanger|
--* Introduction - Rewrite: problem, solution, what is where.
--* Technology: Move MiRo difficulties to Technology
--* Technology: Specify specific limitations and technical options for MiRo
--* Add code to Gitlab
--* Prototype: Talk about the code in the Prototype chapter
--* Future Work: Add limitations and how we would solve them in future work.
--* Perform Wilcoxon test on test data
--|
--* Created a small introduction
--* Rewrote difficulties a bit to add it to Technology
--* Specified specific limitations and technical options for MiRo for the next group as well
--* Add code as snippets to Gitlab
--* Talked about the code in the Prototype chapter
--* Added limitations and how we would solve them in future work.
--* Wilcoxon test has been performed
--|
--|Rohan Sobha|
--* Measuring Instruments: cite papers about what we use for evaluation
--* Human-agent teamwork: Talk about humans and robots working together based on literature
--* Use cases: Read through and check for (grammatical) mistakes
--* Test: Rewrite to make it a bit more specific, ensure that the test is reproducible, add the Wilcoxon test
--* Future work: Add Snoezelen in the context of the evaluation
--* Conclusion: Write a nice end chapter/conclusion on how it went and summarize the results.
--|
--* Cited papers in teamwork with Doreen
--* Added the Human-agent teamwork page and elaborated on working together
--* Use cases have been read through
--* Test page has been rewritten to adhere to the requirements
--* Added Snoezelen in future work
--* Wrote a nice end chapter/conclusion.
--|
--|Ricardo Vogel|
--* Environments and Personas: Write 2 sentences as an intro on the basic Operational Demands page.
--* Environments and Personas: Read through and check if correct.
--* Human factors - Design pattern and ontology: Cite some references
--* Design patterns: Reread and change picture
--* Design patterns: Add caretaker in team design pattern
--|
--* The introduction for Environments and Personas has been made
--* Have been read through
--* References in the design patterns have been made
--* New picture has been created
--* Caretaker has been added
--|
--|All|The final presentation occurred. Doreen, Tim, Ricardo, and Harmen did the presentation. We divided tasks at 31-3 and 1-4 |We evaluated the tasks on 5-4.|
++|Tim Huisman|||
++|Harmen Kroon|||
++|Jeffrey Lim|||
++|Doreen Mulder|||
++|Laura Ottevanger|||
++|Rohan Sobha|||
++|Ricardo Vogel|||
++|All|||