Changes for page TimeTable Table Format

Summary

• Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-XWiki.rsobha
	1	+XWiki.LauraOttevanger

Content

...	...	@@ -3,24 +3,152 @@
3	3
4	4
5	5	|Member|Task|Reflection|
6		-|Tim Huisman|Check if the Miro robot can listen to a name/respond to a name|The accounts weren't there yet so Harmen, Jeffrey, Tim and Laura did some research on the necessary packages and code.|
7		-|Harmen Kroon| Look into the sounds help|The accounts weren't there yet so Harmen, Jeffrey, Tim and Laura did some research on the necessary packages and code.|
8		-|Jeffrey Lim|Look at the basic behavior of the Miro robot (and maybe try it a bit)|The accounts weren't there yet so Harmen, Jeffrey, Tim and Laura did some research on the necessary packages and code.|
9		-|Doreen Mulder|See if Bluetooth connection with Miro would be possible (and if we can check distance)|Doreen made connections between her phone and an Arduino and was able to let the Arduino detect when the distance was too great.|
10		-|Laura Ottevanger|Check and possibly code a path tracking possibility in Miro|The accounts weren't there yet so Harmen, Jeffrey, Tim and Laura did some research on the necessary packages and code.|
	6	+|Tim Huisman|Check if the MiRo robot can listen to a name/respond to a name|The accounts weren't there yet so Harmen, Jeffrey, Tim, and Laura did some research on the necessary packages and code.|
	7	+|Harmen Kroon| Look into the sounds help|The accounts weren't there yet so Harmen, Jeffrey, Tim, and Laura did some research on the necessary packages and code.|
	8	+|Jeffrey Lim|Look at the basic behavior of the MiRo robot (and maybe try it a bit)|The accounts weren't there yet so Harmen, Jeffrey, Tim, and Laura did some research on the necessary packages and code.|
	9	+|Doreen Mulder|See if Bluetooth connection with MiRo would be possible (and if we can check distance)|Doreen made connections between her phone and an Arduino and was able to let the Arduino detect when the distance was too great.|
	10	+|Laura Ottevanger|Check and possibly code a path tracking possibility in MiRo|The accounts weren't there yet so Harmen, Jeffrey, Tim, and Laura did some research on the necessary packages and code.|
11	11	|Rohan Sobha|Work on the report: Operational demands: environments and stakeholders|Rohan made the Environments and Stakeholders.|
12	12	|Ricardo Vogel| Work on the report: Personas and problem scenario|Ricardo made personas.|
13		-|All|In the meeting (8-2) tasks were divided. Deadline is before the meeting next week.| |
	13	+|All|In the meeting (8-2) tasks were divided. The deadline is before the meeting next week.| |
14	14
15	15	=Week 2=
16	16
17	17	|Member|Task|Reflection|
18		-|Tim Huisman|Commandos/voice recognition, help with personas & scenarios|Tim did research on voice recognition and which Python packages are necessary to implement that
19		-Wednesday morning we went to the robot lab and were able to upload a basic program to the robot.|
	18	+|Tim Huisman|Commandos/voice recognition, help with personas & scenarios|Tim did research on voice recognition and which Python packages are necessary to implement that.
	19	+|
20	20	|Harmen Kroon| Harmen: Problem scenarios|Harmen made the problem scenario.|
21		-|Jeffrey Lim| Look into basic behaviour, what does the dog do when touched/petted etc.|Jeffrey tested out with the blockly environment and the Python conversion.|
	21	+|Jeffrey Lim| Look into basic behavior, what does the dog do when touched/petted, etc.|Jeffrey tested out with the blockly environment and the Python conversion.|
22	22	|Doreen Mulder|State diagram / Leash|Doreen made a flowchart about the behavior of the robot.|
23	23	|Laura Ottevanger|Look into pathmaking |Laura made the first storyboard.|
24	24	|Rohan Sobha|Robotic Partner / Music recognition|Rohan made the part on Robotic Partner and Music recognition|
25	25	|Ricardo Vogel|Personas & persona scenarios|Ricardo extended the personas and made persona scenario.|
26		-|All| | |
	26	+|All|In the meeting (15-2) tasks were divided. The deadline is before the meeting next week. |Wednesday morning we went to the robot lab and were able to upload a basic program to the robot. |
	27	+
	28	+=Week 3=
	29	+|Member|Task|Reflection|
	30	+|Tim Huisman|Work on Objectives, and Humanoid Robot, and check if name recognition is possible without the mdk|Made the Objectives and worked on humanoid Robot. Tim also found some Python libraries for name recognition. Tim also made user value stories for stakeholders |
	31	+|Harmen Kroon|Make Ontology|Figured out the program to create an ontology but did not create the ontology yet|
	32	+|Jeffrey Lim|Work on use cases, figure out object/wall detection|Did not work on use cases yet but did take a look at the color detection of the MiRo|
	33	+|Doreen Mulder|Extending the problem scenario section, and attempt at installing the MDK.|Installed the MDK and made an explanation on how to install it. Doreen did not extend the problem scenario yet.|
	34	+|Laura Ottevanger|Make the rest of the storyboards and make the test program|Made the storyboards and some test programs to test on the robot. |
	35	+|Rohan Sobha|Make Claims|Made the claims|
	36	+|Ricardo Vogel|Make Design Patterns|Made the Design Patterns with a drawing of the system.|
	37	+|All|In the meeting (22-2) tasks were divided. |We used Wednesday morning as our lab hours to work on the physical prototype with the MiRo. The MiRo had quite some difficulties in connecting with PCs|
	38	+
	39	+=Week 4=
	40	+|Member|Task|Reflection|
	41	+|Tim Huisman|Extend functions and specify design patterns|Worked on design patterns and the human factors design patterns. Extended/rewrote functions and found parts to discuss for during the lab.|
	42	+|Harmen Kroon|Make the Ontology and write the human factors ontology page|Made ontology. Started on human factors ontology, made some code for demo|
	43	+|Jeffrey Lim|Use Cases and work on mid-term presentation |Made use cases and presented presentation|
	44	+|Doreen Mulder|Extend the problem scenario and work on the wristband for the prototype. Also, make a "hondenriem" prototype (out of cardboard)|Extended problem scenario, and started working on a physical prototype|
	45	+|Laura Ottevanger|Work on Evaluation and work on mid-term presentation |Made and presented the presentation, made a start on evaluation and made some code for the demo.|
	46	+|Rohan Sobha|Work on Evaluation and work on mid-term presentation |Made a start on evaluation, made the presentation, and presented the presentation.|
	47	+|Ricardo Vogel|Specify design patterns and work on the human factors design patterns page|Worked on design patterns and the human factors design patterns|
	48	+|All|In the meeting (1-3) tasks were divided. |In addition to the common Wednesday morning in the Insyght lab, Rohan, Jeffrey, and Laura spend Wednesday afternoon working on the presentation. In the lab we made some small videos for the mid-term presentation:
	49	+
	50	+* Snoezelen = for which we will use the demo version of MiRo,
	51	+* The Wristband = Doreen creates it with an Arduino
	52	+* Walking = We will Wizard of Oz it with a remote control
	53	+* When a PwD walks in the wrong direction = Harmen will create some code for it
	54	+* Ask for attention = Harmen and Laura look into mimicking a barking dog
	55	+* Positive response = Laura will create some code where MiRo is barking, wagging its tail, etc. |
	56	+
	57	+=Week 5= Mid-term presentation
	58	+|Member|Task|Reflection|
	59	+|Tim Huisman|Design pattern diagrams, reread all XWiki pages to check for consistency and todos. Also, refactor some pages|Reread all XWiki pages to check for consistency and made a full to-do list for the rest of the project. Also gave feedback on the evaluation form|
	60	+|Harmen Kroon|Make an extra ontology schema, make human factors ontology, and do some research on existing robot dogs|Due to Harmen being sick, he worked a little bit on some research for existing robot dogs but couldn't finish ontology.|
	61	+|Jeffrey Lim|Make some MiRo code for an alarm when a PwD falls and for snoezelen with different levels of movement.|Made and tested the four pieces of code Wednesday. |
	62	+|Doreen Mulder|Elaborate on evaluation and collaborate with Rohan on experimental setup|Elaborated evaluation and worked on experimental setup|
	63	+|Laura Ottevanger|Also do some research on existing robot dogs and make 4 pieces of code for the prototypes: snoezelen low movement, medium movement, a lot of movement, and the alarm mode|Started with some research on existing robot dogs and made the four prototypes mentioned|
	64	+|Rohan Sobha| Elaborate on evaluation and collaborate with Doreen on experimental setup|Elaborated evaluation and worked on experimental setup|
	65	+|Ricardo Vogel|Going to work on ethics and test if we can connect MiRo to a server and/or with packets|Worked on ethics|
	66	+|All|In the meeting (9-3) tasks were divided. This was in the Insyght lab as during the lecture hours there were presentations|We decided to combine the pieces of code for alarm from Jeffrey and Laura to create an alarm mode. The snoezelen we decided to scrap as we noticed that it would be difficult to test snoezelen with the MiRo, the MiRo is too easy to break|
	67	+
	68	+=Week 6 and 7=
	69	+|Member|Task|Reflection|
	70	+|Tim Huisman|
	71	+* Update flowchart to remove snoezelen to be coherent with the current idea of MiRo
	72	+* Add a textual description of walking with MiRo to incorporate what MiRo should do if PwD stops to talk during the walk
	73	+* Create value stories for indirect stakeholders
	74	+* Incorporate Schwartz's value model in the value stories
	75	+* Describe every single signal, sound, a movement that the PwD will receive/MiRo will make, the reasoning behind it, and its desired effect
	76	+* Link to Technology - Music Management for the explanation of why we do not use music.
	77	+|* Updated flowchart
	78	+* Added the textual description
	79	+* -
	80	+* -
	81	+* Describing the sounds has been completed in the final week.
	82	+* Link to technology has been completed in the final week.
	83	+|
	84	+|Harmen Kroon|
	85	+* Add research on interactions between elderly people and/or PwD's and robots + any other relevant research on the effect of pets/robots on PwD's.
	86	+* Add ontology image to XWiki
	87	+|
	88	+* Added research on existing robots/dogs
	89	+* Ontology image has been added
	90	+|
	91	+|Jeffrey Lim|
	92	+* Expand product vision with Snoezelen and check incorporation in objectives
	93	+* Explain why music is not suitable for our goal/case
	94	+|
	95	+* -
	96	+* - |
	97	+|Doreen Mulder|
	98	+* Add sources for self-determination theory claims
	99	+* Look into "Design scenarios" (lecture 3 probably): a story that conveys a new vision, including activity: narratives of typical or critical services, information: details on info provision, interaction: details of user interaction & feedback
	100	+* Write inclusive design page
	101	+* Change every mention of Miro to MiRo
	102	+* Write in Evaluation the Test about the little interview she had with Erik and how the product was perceived by a hard of hearing person.
	103	+|
	104	+* Added the sources for SDT claims
	105	+* Worked on the Design Scenarios.
	106	+* Inclusive design page has been created.
	107	+* Made MiRo consistent
	108	+* Write evaluation on hard of hearing person
	109	+|
	110	+|Laura Ottevanger|
	111	+* Review use cases
	112	+* Add a future work page indicating our future work, and also that we would have liked to incorporate snoezelen
	113	+* Elaborate on limitations of MiRo
	114	+* Add research on interactions between elderly people and/or PwD's and robots + any other relevant research on the effect of pets/robots on PwD's.
	115	+|
	116	+* Reviewed use cases and made small changes
	117	+* Asked for the future work page and mentioned snoezelen in future work|
	118	+|Rohan Sobha|
	119	+* Review current claims and perhaps add upon sections with small amounts of text/description
	120	+* Add sources on why autonomy is important (basically just link to Self Determination Theory)
	121	+* Check if we can validate claims with evaluation
	122	+* Elaborate on limitations of MiRo
	123	+* Added research on existing robots/dogs
	124	+|
	125	+* Reviewed current claims
	126	+* Added the sources on why autonomy is important
	127	+* Validated claims with evaluation|
	128	+|Ricardo Vogel|
	129	+* Lecture slides state "Persona's need to have goals". Cornelia and Constantijn have these (to some extent), but Marcus does not yet
	130	+* Create a technology disliking persona scenario
	131	+* Create for each scenario a 'before' and 'after technology' piece
	132	+* Make team design pattern into something that is not drawn
	133	+* Make team design pattern including the caretaker
	134	+* Create diagrams for IDP's
	135	+|
	136	+* Added goals for Marcus
	137	+* Created a new persona
	138	+* Created for each scenario a 'before' and 'after technology' piece
	139	+* Completed new design pattern drawing in the final week
	140	+* Completed including the caretaker in the final week
	141	+* -
	142	+|
	143	+|All|In the meeting (15-3) tasks were divided to work on for week 6 and week 7|In week 6 we did the first test run of the evaluation and in week 7 we performed the entire evaluation.|
	144	+
	145	+=Week 8= End presentation
	146	+|Member|Task|Reflection|
	147	+|Tim Huisman|||
	148	+|Harmen Kroon|||
	149	+|Jeffrey Lim|||
	150	+|Doreen Mulder|||
	151	+|Laura Ottevanger|||
	152	+|Rohan Sobha|||
	153	+|Ricardo Vogel|||
	154	+|All|||