Wiki source code of Timetable

Version 40.1 by Laura Ottevanger on 2022/03/31 10:01

version	line-number	content
1.1	1	Week 1:
	2	In the meeting (8-2) tasks were divided. Deadline is before the meeting next week.
	3
	4	Ricardo: Work on the report: Personas and problem scenario
	5	Rohan: Work on the report: Operational demands: environments and stakeholders
	6	Doreen: See if Bluetooth connection with Miro would be possible (and if we can check distance)
	7	Jeffrey: Look at the basic behavior of the Miro robot (and maybe try it a bit)
	8	Harmen: Look into the sounds help
	9	Tim: Check if the Miro robot can listen to a name/respond to a name
	10	Laura: Check and possibly code a path tracking possibility in Miro
	11
	12	Reflection on Week 1:
	13	Ricardo made personas. Rohan made the Environments and Stakeholders.
	14	Doreen made connections between her phone and an Arduino and was able to let the Arduino detect when the distance was too great.
2.1	15	The accounts weren't there yet so Harmen, Jeffrey, Tim and Laura did some research on the necessary packages and code.
1.1	16
	17	Week 2:
2.2	18	Ricardo: Personas & persona scenarios
1.1	19	Rohan: Robotic Partner / Music recognition
	20	Harmen: Problem scenarios
	21	Doreen: State diagram / Leash
3.1	22	Tim: Commandos/voice recognition, help with personas & scenarios
1.1	23	Jeffrey: Look into basic behaviour, what does the dog do when touched/petted etc.
	24	Laura: Look into pathmaking
2.1	25
	26	Reflection on Week 2:
2.2	27	Ricardo extended the personas and made persona scenario.
2.1	28	Rohan made the part on Robotic Partner and Music recognition
	29	Harmen made the problem scenario.
	30	Doreen made a flowchart about the behavior of the robot.
	31	Laura made the first storyboard.
	32	Jeffrey tested out with the blockly environment and the Python conversion.
	33	Tim did research on voice recognition and which Python packages are necessary to implement that
	34	Wednesday morning we went to the robot lab and were able to upload a basic program to the robot.
	35
	36	Week 3:
	37	Ricardo: Design Patterns
	38	Rohan: Claims
	39	Harmen: Ontology
	40	Doreen: Extending problem scenario, installing MDK.
3.1	41	Tim: Objectives, Humanoid Robot, name recognition (Is it possible without the mdk)
2.1	42	Jeffrey: Use cases, figure out object/wall detection
	43	Laura: Storyboards, test program
4.1	44
	45	Reflection on week 3:
	46	Ricardo made the Design Patterns with a drawing of the system.
	47	Rohan made the claims
5.1	48	Harmen: Figured out the program to create an ontology but did not create the ontology yet.
4.1	49	Doreen installed the MDK and made an explanation on how to install it. Doreen did not extend the problem scenario yet.
7.1	50	Tim made the Objectives and worked on humanoid Robot. Tim also found some Python libraries for name recognition. Tim also made user value stories at stake holders.
6.1	51	Jeffrey took a look into use cases but did not make them yet.
4.1	52	Laura made the storyboards and some test programs to test the robots.
5.1	53
	54	Week 4:
	55
8.1	56	Ricardo: Specify design patterns + human factors design patterns.
	57	Rohan: Evaluation + Presentation 1
	58	Harmen: Ontology + human factors ontology
11.1	59	Doreen: Extend problem scenario + work on wristband for prototype + Prototype + make a "hondenriem" prototype out of cardboard
8.1	60	Tim: Extend functions + specify design patterns
	61	Jeffrey: Use Cases + presentation 1
	62	Laura: Evaluation + Presentation 1
9.1	63
	64	We are going to create small videos:
	65	Snoezelen = demoversion of Miro
	66	Wristband = Doreen creates is with Arduino
	67	Walking = Wizard of Oz with remote control
	68
	69	When person with dementia walks in the wrong direction: follow the person, make a sound/bark, turn head as if confused, turn back in correct direction, walk some steps, check if the dog is followed = Harmen
	70	Ask for attention: (bark as real dog) = Doreen
12.1	71	Positive response: wagging, turn ears, yap = Laura
13.1	72
14.1	73	Reflection on week 4:
	74	Ricardo: Worked on design patterns and the human factors design patterns
15.1	75	Tim: Worked on design patterns and the human factors design patterns. Extended/rewrote functions and found parts to discuss about it.
14.1	76	Rohan: Made a start on evaluation, made the presentation and presented the presentation.
	77	Harmen: Made ontology. Started on human factors ontology, made some code for demo
	78	Doreen: Extended problem scenario, started working on a physical prototype
	79	Jeffrey: Made use cases, presented presentation
	80	Laura: Made and presented the presentation, made a start on evaluation, made some code for demo.
13.1	81
	82	Week 5:
14.1	83	Ricardo: Going to work on ethics + test if we can connect miro to a server and/or with packets
15.1	84	Tim: Design pattern diagrams + reread all XWiki pages to check for consistency and todo's + refactor some pages
14.1	85	Doreen: Elaborate on evaluation + collaborate with Rohan on experimental setup
13.1	86	Rohan: Elaborate on evaluation + collaborate with Doreen on experimental setup
14.1	87	Harmen: Extra ontology schema + human factors ontology + research on existing robot dogs
	88	Laura: Also do some research on existing robot dogs + make 4 prototypes/code: snoezelen 1,2,3 + alarm mode
24.1	89	Jeffrey: Make some MiRo code for an alarm when a PwD falls and for snoezelen with different levels of movement.
15.1	90
19.1	91	Reflection on Week 5:
	92	Ricardo: Worked on ethics.
28.1	93	Tim: reread all XWiki pages to check for consistency and made a full to-do list for the rest of the project. Also gave feedback on the evaluation form.
19.1	94	Doreen: Elaborated evaluation + worked on experimental setup
	95	Rohan: Elaborated evaluation + worked on experimental setup + created and worked on the questionnaire
	96	Harmen: Due to Harmen being sick, he worked a little bit on some research for existing robot dogs but couldn't finish ontology
	97	Laura: Started on some research on existing robot dogs + made 4 prototypes/code: snoezelen 1,2,3 + alarm mode
27.1	98	Jeffrey: Made and tested the four pieces of code Wednesday.
15.1	99
27.1	100	We decided to combine the pieces of code for alarm from Jeffrey and Laura to create an alarm mode. The snoezelen we decided to scrap as we noticed that it would be difficult to test snoezelen with the Miro, the miro is too easy to break
19.1	101
20.1	102	== Todos ==
15.1	103	Format: Assignee \| Todo
	104	=== Specification ===
	105	Objectives:
25.1	106	- Jeffrey \| Expand product vision with Snoezelen and check incorporation in objectives
16.1	107
15.1	108	Use cases:
34.1	109	--- Laura \| Review use cases--
15.1	110
	111	Functions:
	112	- Tim \| Update flowchart to remove snoezelen to be coherent with current idea of MiRo
18.1	113	- Tim \| --Add textual description of walking with MiRo to incorporate what MiRo should do if PwD stops to talk during walk--
15.1	114	Claims:
29.1	115	- --Rohan \| Review current claims and perhaps add upon sections with small amounts of text/description--
	116	- --Rohan \| Add sources on why autonomy is important (basically just link to Self Determination Theory)--
	117	- --Rohan \| Check if we can validate claims with evaluation--
15.1	118
16.1	119	Future work:
34.1	120	--- Laura \| Add future work page indicating our future work, and also that we would have liked to incorporate snoezelen--
16.1	121
15.1	122	=== Foundation ===
	123	====Operational demands ====
	124	Environments:
24.1	125	- Jeffrey \| Expand and clarify technologies
15.1	126
	127	Stakeholders:
	128	- Tim \| Create value stories for indirect stakeholders
	129	- Tim \| Incorporate Schwartz value model in the value stories
	130
20.1	131	Personas:
	132	- Ricardo \| Lecture slides state "Persona's need to have goals". Cornelia and Constantijn have these (to some extent), but Marcus does not yet
23.1	133	--- Ricardo \| Create technology disliking persona scenario--
26.1	134	--- Ricardo \| Create for each scenario a 'before' and 'after technology' piece--
15.1	135
	136	Problem scenario:
32.1	137	--- Doreen \| Add sources for self-determination theory claims--
	138	--- Doreen \| Look into "Design scenario's" (lecture 3 probably): a story that conveys a new vision, including activity: narratives of typical or critical services, information: details on info provision, interaction: details of user interaction & feedback--
15.1	139
	140	====Human Factors====
	141	Robotic partner:
34.1	142	--- Laura \| Elaborate on limitations of MiRo w.r.t. snoezelen--
20.1	143	--- Unassigned \| Describe what MiRo could mean as a robotic partner for elderly people / PwD. Perhaps this is not that relevant anymore to write here since snoezelen will be moved to future work.--
	144	- Laura + Harmen\| Add research on interactions between elderly people and/or PwD's and robots + any other relevant research on effect of pets/robots on PwD's.
15.1	145
	146	Design patterns:
35.1	147	- Ricardo \| Make team design pattern into something that is not drawn
	148	- Ricardo \| Make team design pattern including the caretaker
	149	- Ricardo \| Create diagrams for IDP's
15.1	150
	151	Ontology:
	152	- Harmen \| Add ontology image to XWiki
	153
	154	Music and Cognition:
17.1	155	- Tim \| Describe each single signal, sound, movement that the PwD will receive/MiRo will make, the reasoning behind it and its desired effect
	156	- Tim \| Link to Technology - Music Management for the explanation why we do not use music.
15.1	157
	158	Measuring instruments:
	159	We do not yet know what should be here.
	160
	161	Group's core theoretical foundation:
	162	- Unassigned \| Add all sources here at the end of the project?
	163
	164	Inclusive design:
32.1	165	--- Doreen \| Write this page--
15.1	166
	167	Human-Agent teamwork:
	168	We do not yet know what should be here.
	169
	170	==== Technology ====
	171	Humanoid robot:
21.1	172	--Done--
15.1	173
	174	Music management:
25.1	175	- Jeffrey \| Explain why music is not suitable for our goal/case
15.1	176
27.1	177	==== Report ====
	178	Unassigned \| Proofread
	179	Unassigned \| Consistent use of MiRo (Change every mention of Miro to MiRo)
	180	Unassigned \| Talk about the name WAF (Walking Assisting Friend)
30.1	181	Unassigned \| The group's core foundation
36.1	182	--Doreen \| Write in Evaluation -> Test about the little interview I had with Erik and how the product was perceived by a hard of hearing person.
	183	--
37.1	184
	185
	186
	187
	188	=Todo list 2.0=
	189	If you are assigned to a page, please also read the existing text and check for grammatical mistakes. If you are assigned a page, please put an introduction to that page for example: "In this chapter, we will introduce you to our Personas. Personas are <explanation of personas>. Personas are relevant because <enter text here>.". Please explain, what it is and why we use it if relevant.
	190
38.1	191	== Introduction ==
37.1	192	Laura \| Introduction - Rewrite: problem, solution, what is where.
	193	Laura \| Move MiRo difficulties to Technology
	194
38.1	195	== Foundation ==
	196	==== Operational Demands ====
39.1	197
	198	=== Environments and Personas ===
37.1	199	Ricardo \| Write 2 sentences as intro on basic Operational Demands page.
	200	Ricardo \| Read and check if correct
	201
39.1	202	=== Stakeholders and Problem Scenario ===
	203	Harmen \| Write 2 sentences as intro on basic Operational Demands page.
	204	Harmen \| Read and check if correct
	205
	206
38.1	207	==== Human Factors ====
37.1	208
38.1	209	==== Robotic Partner ====
37.1	210	Unassigned \| Read through and add one citation in the todo
	211
38.1	212	==== Music and Cognition ====
37.1	213	Tim and Jeffrey (whoever gets to it first) \| Explanation how doglike sounds could be beneficial based in literature.
	214	= Design Pattern and Ontology =
	215	Harmen and Ricardo \| Cite some references
	216
38.1	217	==== Measuring Instruments ====
37.1	218	Rohan and Doreen? \| cite papers about what we use for evaluation
	219
38.1	220	==== Group's core theoretical foundation ====
37.1	221	Unassigned and Unassigned \| Talk about people with dementia getting lost, if walking helps by PwD, how good walking is for people, budget care homes
	222
38.1	223	==== Inclusive Design ====
37.1	224	Doreen (Unassigned) \| Clean up sources or notify what needs to be done on the page
	225
38.1	226	==== Human-agent Teamwork ====
40.1	227	Unassigned and Unassigned \| Talk about humans and robots working together based in literature
37.1	228
	229	=== Technology ===
38.1	230	==== Humanoid Robot ====
37.1	231	Laura \| Specify specific limitations and technical options for MiRo
	232
38.1	233	==== Music Management ====
37.1	234	Tim and Jeffrey (whoever gets to it first) \| Explanation why we do not use music + what we do use + talk about video of alarm here
	235
38.1	236	== Specification ==
37.1	237	=== Objectives ===
	238	Unassigned \| Remove Snoezelen and expand Objectives
	239
	240	=== Use cases ===
	241	Unassigned \| Read through and check for (grammatical) mistakes
	242
	243	=== Functions ===
	244	Unassigned \| Add reference to future work page.
	245
	246	=== Claims ===
	247	Harmen \| Expand Claims
	248
38.1	249	== Evaluation ==
37.1	250	=== Prototype ===
	251	Laura \| Add code to Github,
	252	Laura \| Talk about code in Prototype chapter
	253
	254	=== Test ===
	255	Unassigned \| Rewrite to make a bit more specific, ensure that the test is reproduceable, add Wilcoxon test
	256	Unassigned \| Add Discussion after the results and ensure that results is just numbers
	257
38.1	258	== Design Patterns ==
37.1	259	Ricardo \| Reread and change picture
	260	Ricardo \| Add caretaker in team design pattern
	261	Ricardo \| Picture for IDP
	262
38.1	263	== Ontology ==
37.1	264	Harmen \| Add second Ontology
	265
38.1	266	== Planning ==
37.1	267	Unassigned \| Rewrite todo-list as a per week description of what happened
	268	(Optional) Unassigned \| Put everything into a nice table like: [Timetable table >> https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group02/view/Timetable/TimeTable%20Table%20Format/]
	269
38.1	270	== Conclusion ==
37.1	271	=== Future Work ===
	272	Unassigned and Laura \| Add limitations and how we would solve it in future work.
	273	Unassigned \| Talk about having only 8 participants, not a correct room (not a carehome hallway but single room), using PwD as test subjects = more realistic test.
	274	Unassigned \| Suggestions for other tests from presentation = test way of attention grabbing
	275	=== Conclusion ===
	276	Unassigned \| Write a nice end chapter/conclusion on how it went and summarizing results.
	277