Skip to Content

Wiki source code of Timetable

Version 15.1 by Tim Huisman on 2022/03/09 10:19
Show last authors
1 Week 1:
2 In the meeting (8-2) tasks were divided. Deadline is before the meeting next week.
3
4 Ricardo: Work on the report: Personas and problem scenario
5 Rohan: Work on the report: Operational demands: environments and stakeholders
6 Doreen: See if Bluetooth connection with Miro would be possible (and if we can check distance)
7 Jeffrey: Look at the basic behavior of the Miro robot (and maybe try it a bit)
8 Harmen: Look into the sounds help
9 Tim: Check if the Miro robot can listen to a name/respond to a name
10 Laura: Check and possibly code a path tracking possibility in Miro
11
12 Reflection on Week 1:
13 Ricardo made personas. Rohan made the Environments and Stakeholders.
14 Doreen made connections between her phone and an Arduino and was able to let the Arduino detect when the distance was too great.
15 The accounts weren't there yet so Harmen, Jeffrey, Tim and Laura did some research on the necessary packages and code.
16
17 Week 2:
18 Ricardo: Personas & persona scenarios
19 Rohan: Robotic Partner / Music recognition
20 Harmen: Problem scenarios
21 Doreen: State diagram / Leash
22 Tim: Commandos/voice recognition, help with personas & scenarios
23 Jeffrey: Look into basic behaviour, what does the dog do when touched/petted etc.
24 Laura: Look into pathmaking
25
26 Reflection on Week 2:
27 Ricardo extended the personas and made persona scenario.
28 Rohan made the part on Robotic Partner and Music recognition
29 Harmen made the problem scenario.
30 Doreen made a flowchart about the behavior of the robot.
31 Laura made the first storyboard.
32 Jeffrey tested out with the blockly environment and the Python conversion.
33 Tim did research on voice recognition and which Python packages are necessary to implement that
34 Wednesday morning we went to the robot lab and were able to upload a basic program to the robot.
35
36 Week 3:
37 Ricardo: Design Patterns
38 Rohan: Claims
39 Harmen: Ontology
40 Doreen: Extending problem scenario, installing MDK.
41 Tim: Objectives, Humanoid Robot, name recognition (Is it possible without the mdk)
42 Jeffrey: Use cases, figure out object/wall detection
43 Laura: Storyboards, test program
44
45 Reflection on week 3:
46 Ricardo made the Design Patterns with a drawing of the system.
47 Rohan made the claims
48 Harmen: Figured out the program to create an ontology but did not create the ontology yet.
49 Doreen installed the MDK and made an explanation on how to install it. Doreen did not extend the problem scenario yet.
50 Tim made the Objectives and worked on humanoid Robot. Tim also found some Python libraries for name recognition. Tim also made user value stories at stake holders.
51 Jeffrey took a look into use cases but did not make them yet.
52 Laura made the storyboards and some test programs to test the robots.
53
54 Week 4:
55
56 Ricardo: Specify design patterns + human factors design patterns.
57 Rohan: Evaluation + Presentation 1
58 Harmen: Ontology + human factors ontology
59 Doreen: Extend problem scenario + work on wristband for prototype + Prototype + make a "hondenriem" prototype out of cardboard
60 Tim: Extend functions + specify design patterns
61 Jeffrey: Use Cases + presentation 1
62 Laura: Evaluation + Presentation 1
63
64 We are going to create small videos:
65 Snoezelen = demoversion of Miro
66 Wristband = Doreen creates is with Arduino
67 Walking = Wizard of Oz with remote control
68
69 When person with dementia walks in the wrong direction: follow the person, make a sound/bark, turn head as if confused, turn back in correct direction, walk some steps, check if the dog is followed = Harmen
70 Ask for attention: (bark as real dog) = Doreen
71 Positive response: wagging, turn ears, yap = Laura
72
73 Reflection on week 4:
74 Ricardo: Worked on design patterns and the human factors design patterns
75 Tim: Worked on design patterns and the human factors design patterns. Extended/rewrote functions and found parts to discuss about it.
76 Rohan: Made a start on evaluation, made the presentation and presented the presentation.
77 Harmen: Made ontology. Started on human factors ontology, made some code for demo
78 Doreen: Extended problem scenario, started working on a physical prototype
79 Jeffrey: Made use cases, presented presentation
80 Laura: Made and presented the presentation, made a start on evaluation, made some code for demo.
81
82 Week 5:
83 Ricardo: Going to work on ethics + test if we can connect miro to a server and/or with packets
84 Tim: Design pattern diagrams + reread all XWiki pages to check for consistency and todo's + refactor some pages
85 Doreen: Elaborate on evaluation + collaborate with Rohan on experimental setup
86 Rohan: Elaborate on evaluation + collaborate with Doreen on experimental setup
87 Harmen: Extra ontology schema + human factors ontology + research on existing robot dogs
88 Laura: Also do some research on existing robot dogs + make 4 prototypes/code: snoezelen 1,2,3 + alarm mode
89 Jeffrey: Make some code (?)
90
91
92 == Todo's ==
93 Format: Assignee | Todo
94 === Specification ===
95 Objectives:
96 - Unassigned | Expand product vision with Snoezelen and check incorporation in objectives
97 Use cases:
98 - Unassigned | Review use cases
99
100 Functions:
101 - Tim | Update flowchart to remove snoezelen to be coherent with current idea of MiRo
102 - Tim | Add textual description of walking with MiRo to incorporate what MiRo should do if PwD stops to talk during walk
103
104 Claims:
105 - Unassigned | Review current claims and perhaps add upon sections with small amounts of text/description
106 - Unassigned | Add sources on why autonomy is important (basically just link to Self Determination Theory)
107 - Unassigned | Check if we can validate claims with evaluation
108
109 === Foundation ===
110 ====Operational demands ====
111 Environments:
112 - Unassigned | Expand and clarify technologies
113
114 Stakeholders:
115 - Tim | Create value stories for indirect stakeholders
116 - Tim | Incorporate Schwartz value model in the value stories
117
118 Persona's:
119 - Unassigned | Lecture slides state "Persona's need to have goals". Cornelia and Constantijn have these (to some extent), but Marcus does not yet
120 - Unassigned | Create technology disliking persona scenario
121 - Unassigned | Create for each scenario a 'before' and 'after technology' piece
122
123 Problem scenario:
124 - Unassigned | Add sources for self-determination theory claims
125 - Unassigned | Look into "Design scenario's" (lecture 3 probably): a story that conveys a new vision, including activity: narratives of typical or critical services, information: details on info provision, interaction: details of user interaction & feedback
126
127 ====Human Factors====
128 Robotic partner:
129 - Unassigned | Describe what MiRo could mean as a robotic partner for elderly people / PwD. Perhaps this is not that relevant anymore to write here since snoezelen will be moved to future work.
130 - Unassigned | Add research on interactions between elderly people and/or PwD's and robots + any other relevant research on effect of pets/robots on PwD's.
131
132 Design patterns:
133 - Tim | Make team design pattern into something that is not drawn
134 - Tim | Make team design pattern including the caretaker
135 - Tim | Create diagrams for IDP's
136
137 Ontology:
138 - Harmen | Add ontology image to XWiki
139
140 Music and Cognition:
141 - Unassigned | Describe each single signal, sound, movement that the PwD will receive/MiRo will make, the reasoning behind it and its desired effect
142 - Unassigned | Link to Technology - Music Management for the explanation why we do not use music.
143
144 Measuring instruments:
145 We do not yet know what should be here.
146
147 Group's core theoretical foundation:
148 - Unassigned | Add all sources here at the end of the project?
149
150 Inclusive design:
151 We do not yet know what should be here.
152
153 Human-Agent teamwork:
154 We do not yet know what should be here.
155
156 ==== Technology ====
157 Humanoid robot:
158 Done
159
160 Music management:
161 - Unassigned | Explain why music is not suitable for our goal/case
162