Changes for page Timetable

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@
90	90
91	91	Reflection on Week 5:
92	92	Ricardo: Worked on ethics.
93		-Tim: reread all XWiki pages to check for consistency and made some todo's
	93	+Tim: reread all XWiki pages to check for consistency and made a full to-do list for the rest of the project. Also gave feedback on the evaluation form.
94	94	Doreen: Elaborated evaluation + worked on experimental setup
95	95	Rohan: Elaborated evaluation + worked on experimental setup + created and worked on the questionnaire
96	96	Harmen: Due to Harmen being sick, he worked a little bit on some research for existing robot dogs but couldn't finish ontology
...	...	@@ -106,18 +106,18 @@
106	106	- Jeffrey | Expand product vision with Snoezelen and check incorporation in objectives
107	107
108	108	Use cases:
109		-- Laura | Review use cases
	109	+--- Laura | Review use cases--
110	110
111	111	Functions:
112	112	- Tim | Update flowchart to remove snoezelen to be coherent with current idea of MiRo
113	113	- Tim | --Add textual description of walking with MiRo to incorporate what MiRo should do if PwD stops to talk during walk--
114	114	Claims:
115		-- Rohan | Review current claims and perhaps add upon sections with small amounts of text/description
116		-- Rohan | Add sources on why autonomy is important (basically just link to Self Determination Theory)
117		-- Rohan | Check if we can validate claims with evaluation
	115	+- --Rohan | Review current claims and perhaps add upon sections with small amounts of text/description--
	116	+- --Rohan | Add sources on why autonomy is important (basically just link to Self Determination Theory)--
	117	+- --Rohan | Check if we can validate claims with evaluation--
118	118
119	119	Future work:
120		-- Laura | Add future work page indicating our future work, and also that we would have liked to incorporate snoezelen
	120	+--- Laura | Add future work page indicating our future work, and also that we would have liked to incorporate snoezelen--
121	121
122	122	=== Foundation ===
123	123	====Operational demands ====
...	...	@@ -134,12 +134,12 @@
134	134	--- Ricardo | Create for each scenario a 'before' and 'after technology' piece--
135	135
136	136	Problem scenario:
137		-- Doreen | Add sources for self-determination theory claims
138		-- Doreen | Look into "Design scenario's" (lecture 3 probably): a story that conveys a new vision, including activity: narratives of typical or critical services, information: details on info provision, interaction: details of user interaction & feedback
	137	+--- Doreen | Add sources for self-determination theory claims--
	138	+--- Doreen | Look into "Design scenario's" (lecture 3 probably): a story that conveys a new vision, including activity: narratives of typical or critical services, information: details on info provision, interaction: details of user interaction & feedback--
139	139
140	140	====Human Factors====
141	141	Robotic partner:
142		-- Laura | Elaborate on limitations of MiRo w.r.t. snoezelen
	142	+--- Laura | Elaborate on limitations of MiRo w.r.t. snoezelen--
143	143	--- Unassigned | Describe what MiRo could mean as a robotic partner for elderly people / PwD. Perhaps this is not that relevant anymore to write here since snoezelen will be moved to future work.--
144	144	- Laura + Harmen| Add research on interactions between elderly people and/or PwD's and robots + any other relevant research on effect of pets/robots on PwD's.
145	145
...	...	@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@
162	162	- Unassigned | Add all sources here at the end of the project?
163	163
164	164	Inclusive design:
165		-- Doreen | Write this page
	165	+--- Doreen | Write this page--
166	166
167	167	Human-Agent teamwork:
168	168	We do not yet know what should be here.
...	...	@@ -178,4 +178,6 @@
178	178	Unassigned | Proofread
179	179	Unassigned | Consistent use of MiRo (Change every mention of Miro to MiRo)
180	180	Unassigned | Talk about the name WAF (Walking Assisting Friend)
	181	+Unassigned | The group's core foundation
	182	+Doreen | Write in Evaluation -> Test about the little interview I had with Erik and how the product was perceived by a hard of hearing person.
181	181