Week 1

Week 2

Week 3

Week 4

• Snoezelen = for which we will use the demo version of MiRo, 
• The Wristband = Doreen creates it with an Arduino
• Walking = We will Wizard of Oz it with a remote control
• When a PwD walks in the wrong direction = Harmen will create some code for it
• Ask for attention = Harmen and Laura look into mimicking a barking dog
• Positive response = Laura will create some code where MiRo is barking, wagging its tail, etc. |

Week 5

 Mid-term presentation

Week 6 and 7

• Update flowchart to remove snoezelen to be coherent with the current idea of MiRo
• Add a textual description of walking with MiRo to incorporate what MiRo should do if PwD stops to talk during the walk
•  Create value stories for indirect stakeholders
• Incorporate Schwartz's value model in the value stories
• Describe every single signal, sound, a movement that the PwD will receive/MiRo will make, the reasoning behind it, and its desired effect
• Link to Technology - Music Management for the explanation of why we do not use music.

• Updated flowchart
• Added the textual description
• -
• -
• Describing the sounds has been completed in the final week.
• Link to technology has been completed in the final week.

• Add research on interactions between elderly people and/or PwD's and robots + any other relevant research on the effect of pets/robots on PwD's.
• Add ontology image to XWiki

• Added research on existing robots/dogs
• Ontology image has been added

• Expand product vision with Snoezelen and check incorporation in objectives
• Explain why music is not suitable for our goal/case

• - 
• - 

• Add sources for self-determination theory claims
• Look into "Design scenarios" (lecture 3 probably): a story that conveys a new vision, including activity: narratives of typical or critical services, information: details on info provision, interaction: details of user interaction & feedback
• Write inclusive design page
• Change every mention of Miro to MiRo
• Write in Evaluation the Test about the little interview she had with Erik and how the product was perceived by a hard-of-hearing person.

• Added the sources for SDT claims
• Worked on the Design Scenarios.
• Inclusive design page has been created.
• Made MiRo consistent
• Write an evaluation on a hard-of-hearing person

• Review use cases
• Add a future work page indicating our future work, and also that we would have liked to incorporate snoezelen 
• Elaborate on limitations of MiRo 
• Add research on interactions between elderly people and/or PwD's and robots + any other relevant research on the effect of pets/robots on PwD's.

• Reviewed use cases and made small changes
• Asked for the future work page and mentioned snoezelen in future work
• Elaborated on the limitations
• Did research on existing robots 

• Review current claims and perhaps add upon sections with small amounts of text/description
• Add sources on why autonomy is important (basically just link to Self Determination Theory)
• Check if we can validate claims with evaluation

• Reviewed current claims
• Added the sources on why autonomy is important
• Validated claims with evaluation

• Lecture slides state "Persona's need to have goals". Cornelia and Constantijn have these (to some extent), but Marcus does not yet
• Create a technology disliking persona scenario
• Create for each scenario a 'before' and 'after technology' piece
• Make team design pattern into something that is not drawn
• Make team design pattern including the caretaker
• Create diagrams for IDP's

• Added goals for Marcus
• Created a new persona
• Created for each scenario a 'before' and 'after technology' piece
• Completed new design pattern drawing in the final week
• Completed including the caretaker in the final week
• -

Week 8

End presentation

• Robotic Partner: Read through robotic partner and add one citation in the todo
• Objectives: Remove Snoezelen from Objectives and expand Objectives
• Future work: Move everything Snoezelen related to future work and make a coherent story
• Future work: Write about the suggestions for other tests from the presentation in Future work e.g. test way of attention-grabbing
•  Conclusion: Write a nice end chapter/conclusion on how it went and summarize the results. 

• Changed robotic partner and added the citation
• Removed Snoezelen and expanded Objectives
• Move everything Snoezelen related to future work and make a coherent story
• Wrote about other tests in future work
• Wrote the conclusion and summary

• Stakeholders and Problem Scenario: Write 2 sentences as an intro for stakeholders and problem scenario
• Stakeholders and Problem Scenario: Read through the stakeholders and problem scenario
• Human factors - Design pattern and ontology: Cite some references in Ontology
• Claims: Expand Claims
• Ontology: Add a second Ontology

• Intro has been written
• Has been read through
• Cited some references in Ontology
• Expanded claims
• Added extra ontology

• Music and Cognition: Explanation of how doglike sounds and movements could be beneficial based on literature and motivate why music is inappropriate for our use case.
• Group's core theoretical foundation: Talk about people with dementia getting lost, if walking helps by PwD, how good walking is for people, budget care homes
• Music management: Explanation of why we do not use music + what we do use + talk about the video of alarm here
• Future Work: Add limitations and how we would solve them in future work.

• Added why doglike sounds are beneficial for walking and added a section on music and cognition
• Wrote the group's core theoretical foundation
• Expanded the Music Management
• Fixed a few issues with the future work

• Measuring Instruments: cite papers about what we use for evaluation
• Inclusive design: Clean up sources or notify what needs to be done on the page
• Discussion: Add Discussion after the results and ensure that the results are just numbers
• Future work: Talk about having only 8 participants, not a correct room (not a care home hallway but a single room), using PwD as test subjects = more realistic test. 

• Cited papers in teamwork with Rohan
• Added sources and created the page
• Added Discussion and changed results
• Has been put in Test as it might suit better for now

• Introduction - Rewrite: problem, solution, what is where.
• Technology: Move MiRo difficulties to Technology
• Technology: Specify specific limitations and technical options for MiRo
• Add code to Gitlab
• Prototype: Talk about the code in the Prototype chapter
• Future Work: Add limitations and how we would solve them in future work.
• Perform Wilcoxon test on test data

• Created a small introduction
• Rewrote difficulties a bit to add it to Technology
• Specified specific limitations and technical options for MiRo for the next group as well
• Add code as snippets to Gitlab
• Talked about the code in the Prototype chapter
• Added limitations and how we would solve them in future work.
• Wilcoxon test has been performed

• Measuring Instruments: cite papers about what we use for evaluation
• Human-agent teamwork: Talk about humans and robots working together based on literature
• Use cases: Read through and check for (grammatical) mistakes
• Test: Rewrite to make it a bit more specific, ensure that the test is reproducible, add the Wilcoxon test
• Future work: Add Snoezelen in the context of the evaluation
• Conclusion: Write a nice end chapter/conclusion on how it went and summarize the results. 

• Cited papers in teamwork with Doreen
• Added the Human-agent teamwork page and elaborated on working together
• Use cases have been read through
• Test page has been rewritten to adhere to the requirements
• Added Snoezelen in future work
• Wrote a nice end chapter/conclusion.

• Environments and Personas: Write 2 sentences as an intro on the basic Operational Demands page.
• Environments and Personas: Read through and check if correct.
• Human factors - Design pattern and ontology: Cite some references
• Design patterns: Reread and change the picture
• Design patterns: Add caretaker in team design pattern

• The introduction for Environments and Personas has been made
• Have been read through
• References in the design patterns have been made
• New picture has been created
• Caretaker has been added