XWiki - Test

= Problem statement and research questions =

Provide support to Patients with Dementia (PwD) who currently are dependent on their caretakers and significant other to go for walks. This is outlined in more detail in the [[Objectives>>https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group02/view/Objectives/]] section. The presumed baseline is that PwD walk under supervision of their loved ones or caretakers. To reach our objective and support our claims, we would like to put forward the following research questions:

3

4

1. Does walking with the MiRo increase the perceived satisfaction?

5

1. Does walking with the MiRo increase the perceived autonomy?

6

1. To which degree do users express familiarity with the MiRo?

7

1. How do users react to snoezelen with a moving robot?

= Method =

To this effect, we would like to invite users to participate in a usability study. In the study, we will assess the first two research questions by dividing the participants into two groups: one with a //caretaker// and one with a //MiRo//. The former group will enact the activity of walking in the current setting and the latter group will do the equivalent with the robot. Afterwards, both groups are assessed by means of Likert-scales to measure the increase.

== Participants==

PwD (or students playing the part of a PwD)

16

17

== Experimental design==

18

The first two questions can be answered using a within-subject design in order to be able to measure the //increase// per subject. The learning effect will be mitigated, because the two juxtaposed settings are vastly different. So, there is no advantage for the participant to be subjected to two conditions serially.

19

20

The third question is posed as a exploratory question. There will be no alternative condition. The expression of familiarity will be recorded in the form of audio recording which are to be transcribed afterwards. Naturally, the recordings will be deleted subsequently to comply with GDPR.

21

22

The last question is also exploratory. Where subjects are divided into groups according to a between-subject design with the purpose of exposing one group to a stationary robot

== Tasks==

Walking the dog

Snoezelen

== Measures==

Attentiveness

Questionnaire/(semi-structured) Interview (see [[(Neerincx et al., to appear)>>]])

31

32

== Procedure==

33

There are two different situations that need to be tested.

34

The first situation is walking with the Miro. The PwD is given the MiRo and the bracelet/leash, the MiRo has a pre-programmed route to walk. The PwD is asked to walk with the dog. While they are walking the dog, they are observed, preferably by cameras as to simulate the situation how the MiRo should be used. The emotional state of the PwD is actively monitored by looking at facial expressions. Furthermore, the researchers will actively check how easily the PwD interact with the MiRo to check the familiarity. When the PwD is done walking, some small questions will be asked to check the satisfaction, autonomy and familiarity.

35

36

The second situation is Snoezelen. The PwD will sit at a table, the MiRo will be put on the table. The researcher will either stay in the room or put up cameras to observe the PwD. The PwD will be encouraged to pet and play with the MiRo. During the Snoezelen, the emotional state of the PwD will be observed. The researchers will also observe how easily the PwD handles the MiRo. After the snoezelen, the PwD will be asked how they felt during the Snoezelen.

37

38

Functions like when an elderly person falls or when they walk the wrong direction will not forcibly be tested with PwD as this might create a dangerous situation. These functions will be tested in advance with the use of "Dogfeeding". Other people from the development-team will test these functions.

39

40

== Material==

41

The items necessary for the tests are the following

42

* MiRo + bracelet/leash

43

* Camera to observe

44

* Caretaker in a nearby room in case of emergency

45