Changes for page Test

Last modified by Laura Ottevanger on 2022/04/05 14:02

From version Icon 40.5 Icon
edited by Doreen Mulder
on 2022/04/04 13:48
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 41.1 Icon
edited by Doreen Mulder
on 2022/04/04 14:02
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -111,9 +111,11 @@
111 111  = Discussion =
112 112  
113 113  Through this test, we aim to answer the question: "Does walking with the MiRo increase the perceived autonomy of people with dementia, compared to walking under guidance of a caretaker?"
114 -We can conclude that in the current state of our prototype, this is not the case. The caretaker is preferred when asked if the user feels in charge, feels safe, and feels trustworthy. However, we note that the MiRo does slightly outperform the caretaker in regards to happiness. We think that further development is needed to accurately gauge if walking with a MiRo will eventually score equally or better compared to walking with a caretaker.
114 +We see that in the current state of our prototype, this is not the case. The caretaker is preferred when asked if the user feels in charge, feels safe, and feels trustworthy. However, we note that the MiRo does slightly outperform the caretaker in regards to happiness. We think that further development is needed to accurately gauge if walking with a MiRo will eventually score equally or better compared to walking with a caretaker.
115 +We see flaws in the limited testing setup that was available to us. With only eight participants, it is nearly impossible to draw conclusions from the experiment. Additionally, these participants were actors and not real people with dementia, which may have caused bias in our results. Finally, while we intended to have the participants walk through a hallway accompanied by MiRo, we only had a meeting room available to conduct the experiment in.
115 115  
116 116  
118 +
117 117  ==== Inclusivity ====
118 118  
119 119  In addition to the questionnaire, we conducted a short interview with our participant who is hard-of-hearing. Their study was conducted without them wearing their hearing aids.
... ... @@ -123,3 +123,8 @@
123 123  
124 124  
125 125  = Conclusions =
128 +In conclusion, the prototype as-is is not capable of outperforming the benefits of a traditional walk with a caretaker. Additional work is needed to bring the prototype to a state of usability where users walking with MiRo can feel trust, happiness, safety, and being in charge. We would like to conduct a similar experiment with real people with dementia, in a setting that is familiar to them, to properly simulate a realistic use case. In the future, we would increase the number of participants to gain better insights into the usability of our prototype.
129 +
130 +
131 +
132 +