Skip to Content

Changes for page Test

Last modified by Laura Ottevanger on 2022/04/05 14:02
From version Icon 20.1 Icon
edited by Rohan Sobha
on 2022/03/14 18:05
Change comment: Moved comment thread to comments instead of page
To version Icon 23.1 Icon
edited by Ricardo Vogel
on 2022/03/15 11:01
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -XWiki.rsobha
1 +XWiki.ricardovogel
Content
... ... @@ -26,6 +26,9 @@
26 26  
27 27  The experiment will be recorded in the form of audio recording which are to be transcribed afterwards. Naturally, the recordings will be deleted subsequently to comply with GDPR.
28 28  
29 +== Ethical Approval ==
30 +Though the official ethical approval was handled by the course staff, we have also filled in the HREC Risk Assessment and Mitigation Plan form. The form can be found [[here>>https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group02/download/Test/WebHome/HREC-checklist-group-2.pdf?rev=1.1]]
31 +
29 29  == Tasks ==
30 30  
31 31  We break up our experiment into the following tasks:
... ... @@ -49,11 +49,8 @@
49 49  
50 50  == Procedure ==
51 51  
52 -There are two different situations that need to be tested.
53 -The first situation is walking with the Miro. The PwD is given the MiRo and the bracelet/leash, the MiRo has a pre-programmed route to walk. The PwD is asked to walk with the dog. While they are walking the dog, they are observed, preferably by cameras as to simulate the situation how the MiRo should be used. The emotional state of the PwD is actively monitored by looking at facial expressions. Furthermore, the researchers will actively check how easily the PwD interact with the MiRo to check the familiarity. When the PwD is done walking, some small questions will be asked to check the satisfaction, autonomy and familiarity.
55 +The procedure is that the person with dementia is walking with the Miro. The PwD is given the MiRo and the bracelet/leash, the MiRo has a pre-programmed route to walk. The PwD is asked to walk with the dog. While they are walking the dog, they are observed, preferably by cameras as to simulate the situation how the MiRo should be used. The emotional state of the PwD is actively monitored by looking at facial expressions. Furthermore, the researchers will actively check how easily the PwD interact with the MiRo to check the familiarity. When the PwD is done walking, some small questions will be asked to check the satisfaction, autonomy and familiarity.
54 54  
55 -The second situation is Snoezelen. The PwD will sit at a table, the MiRo will be put on the table. The researcher will either stay in the room or put up cameras to observe the PwD. The PwD will be encouraged to pet and play with the MiRo. During the Snoezelen, the emotional state of the PwD will be observed. The researchers will also observe how easily the PwD handles the MiRo. After the snoezelen, the PwD will be asked how they felt during the Snoezelen.
56 -
57 57  Functions like when an elderly person falls or when they walk the wrong direction will not forcibly be tested with PwD as this might create a dangerous situation. These functions will be tested in advance with the use of "Dogfeeding". Other people from the development-team will test these functions.
58 58  
59 59  == Material ==
Icon HREC-checklist-group-2.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.ricardovogel
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +67.7 KB
Content Icon