Changes for page Humanoid Robot

Last modified by Laura Ottevanger on 2022/04/05 13:53

From version Icon 6.1 Icon
edited by Tim Huisman
on 2022/03/01 11:30
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 5.1 Icon
edited by Tim Huisman
on 2022/03/01 11:30
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -14,7 +14,8 @@
14 14  * Pepper is a larger humanoid robot with wheels, therefore not having the same problem NAO has. It has fully movable arms and a tablet on its chest, allowing for detailed interactions including gestures and user input. Although these features are nice, they are not required for our goal. These features also mean that Pepper is quite large, taking up a lot of space in each room or corridor.
15 15  * MiRo, on the other hand, is a small robot dog with wheels. We chose MiRo because it has all the necessary features to facilitate walks, without any downsides. Next to this, a dog is automatically associated with taking a walk. Also, the robot dog has dog like features, allowing it to respond to touch, make noises and move certain parts to resemble a dog. Its dog-like appearance and its ability to act like a dog will allow the dog to become a companion. By allowing the user to go on fun walks, responding to personalised voice commands and responding positively to the patients' touch, it will become a trusted friend.
16 16  
17 -Although MiRo was the most desirable choice of the available robots, it is not perfect for our use case. MiRo is frail robot that cannot withstand any handling rougher than soft touches. As described in functions, we ideally would want a physical connection to the dog so that the PwD does not lose focus when walking with MiRo. However, given the frailty of MiRo, a physical attachment would likely result in damaging a €2.400 robot. Next to this, MiRo can only be used inside as it cannot go up steps or walk on any rough terrain. With the right robot, PwD could also take walks outside for example.
17 +Although MiRo was the most desirable choice of the available robots, it is not perfect for our use case.
18 +MiRo is frail robot that cannot withstand any handling rougher than soft touches. As described in functions, we ideally would want a physical connection to the dog so that the PwD does not lose focus when walking with MiRo. However, given the frailty of MiRo, a physical attachment would likely result in damaging a €2.400 robot. Next to this, MiRo can only be used inside as it cannot go up steps or walk on any rough terrain. With the right robot, PwD could also take walks outside for example.
18 18  
19 19  
20 20