Skip to Content

Changes for page Measuring Instruments

Last modified by Laura Ottevanger on 2022/04/05 13:48
From version Icon 4.1 Icon
edited by Rohan Sobha
on 2022/04/02 18:54
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 5.1 Icon
edited by Rohan Sobha
on 2022/04/02 18:56
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1 -In this section, we will outline the measuring instruments used to evaluate our prototype and a motivation for using each of them. During the lecture on evaluation, we were presented with the DECIDE [[(Preece et al., 2015, Chapter 13)>>http://oro.open.ac.uk/29638/]] framework and the IMPACT (Benyon et al., 2005) framework. Firstly, we will briefly explain how we incorporated the DECIDE framework into our own project. Secondly, we will mostly elaborate on the intentions from the IMPACT framework as the other letters of the acronym are delineated across this XWiki.
1 +In this section, we will outline the measuring instruments used to evaluate our prototype and a motivation for using each of them. During the lecture on evaluation, we were presented with the **DECIDE** [[(Preece et al., 2015, Chapter 13)>>http://oro.open.ac.uk/29638/]] framework and the IMPACT (Benyon et al., 2005) framework. Firstly, we will briefly explain how we incorporated the **DECIDE** framework into our own project. Secondly, we will mostly elaborate on the intentions from the **IMPACT** framework as the other letters of the acronym are delineated across this XWiki.
2 2  
3 -= DECIDE =
3 += **DECIDE** =
4 4  
5 5  == **D**etermine the goals ==
6 6  Our aim is to develop a robot that can assist PwD living in a care home on their daily walks. The idea is that PwD will perceive a higher level of autonomy when they walk with a robot dog, assuming it is tailored to their needs, compared to walking with a caretaker. PwDs do not want to put the burden on their loved ones and caretakers to assist them with conducting their daily activities in general.
... ... @@ -22,17 +22,17 @@
22 22  
23 23  Preferably, one would conduct this experiment as a field study in a PwD's natural environment (i.e. the care home) with multiple sessions to account for sudden mood changes in PwD. So, the fact that the participants were students and the experiment was held in a meeting room did influence the findings a little. We predict that participants would experience higher degrees of freedom in an actual care home would hallways and rooms to explore compared to a meeting room where the participant was confined between the four walls of the meeting room. Therefore, we acknowledge that the experiment may not be ecologically valid.
24 24  
25 -= IMPACT =
25 += **IMPACT** =
26 26  
27 -== Intention ==
27 +== **I**ntention ==
28 28  
29 29  Our intention is to study the overall effects of our prototype. As such, we opted for a *summative evaluation* where we compare between the experience of walking with a caretaker and walking with a robot dog as independent variables.
30 30  
31 -== Metrics ==
31 +== **M**etrics ==
32 32  
33 33  The metrics are outlined in our [[Test>>https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group02/view/Test/]] section.
34 34  
35 -== People, Activities, Context and Technologies (PACT) ==
35 +== **P**eople, **A**ctivities, **C**ontext and **T**echnologies (PACT) ==
36 36  
37 37  Our PACT analysis is mentioned in our [[Environments>>https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group02/view/Foundation/Operational%20Demands/Environments/]] section.
38 38