Changes for page Claims
Last modified by Laura Ottevanger on 2022/04/05 13:59
From version
25.1


edited by Rohan Sobha
on 2022/03/22 21:00
on 2022/03/22 21:00
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version
11.1


edited by Rohan Sobha
on 2022/02/23 16:12
on 2022/02/23 16:12
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,57 +1,59 @@ 1 -As mentioned in [[Functions.WebHome]], there are two functions. However,dueto thescope of the course, we will focus on the first function:Walkingwith theMiRo. Dueto thescopeofthisprojectand the limitationsof the MiRo,wewillnot evaluateSnoezelenas our second function. It is howeverdescribed within thecontextofclaims to demonstratehow Snoezelen with a future MiRomay affectdifferentpersons with dementia.1 +As mentioned in [[Functions.WebHome]], there are two functions. For each described function, a claim can be formed about the positives as well as the negative effects of implementing each function. 2 2 3 -Key terms: Pe rson with Dementia (PwD)3 +Key terms: Patient with Dementia (PwD) 4 4 5 - Forthe both functions, we will outlinethe positive aswell as the negative effects for eachpersona and theirinteractionon the storyboard. Finally, we will construct a claim from these effects.5 += Walking with Miro = 6 6 7 -= WalkingwiththeMiRo =7 +== PwD who likes dogs == 8 8 9 -== Effectson Personas==9 +=== Positive effects === 10 10 11 - === Cornelia(PwD wholikes dogs)===11 +The PwD will have had some good exercise and mentally feels happier. 12 12 13 - Afterwalking with theMiRo, Cornelia will feel happier as she was able to rekindle some nostalgic memories she obtained when walking with the former dog she used to own. In addition, her mood will increase as she managed to do some exercise. Cornelia's introvertednessand independence make her reluctant to bother her loved ones or caretakers to go on a walk with her. As such she is relieved that the MiRo allows her to regain some ofherformer autonomysheused to enjoy.13 +=== Negative effects === 14 14 15 -Th at beingsaid,shemaygrowfondofwalkingwiththeMiRo and exert herownbodybywalking more than shecan handle ather age.Moreover, the MiRomightnot be able to assist her immediately if Corneliagets injured herselfbywalking intoobstacles or trippingovertheMiRo.15 +The PwD may not want to stop walking the dog and exhaust their bodies beyond its limits. This is unlikely in general, but it can definitely occur. 16 16 17 -== =Constantijn (PwD who dislikes dogs)===17 +== PwD who dislikes dogs == 18 18 19 - Afterwalking with the MiRo, Constantijn will feel elated that he was able to leave his room at all. Constantijn is known for his eagerness to talk to his co-residents and the MiRo allows him to fulfill his desire. Although he is less bothered by the lack of autonomy, it does providehim with a littleboost in self-confidence as he was ableto accomplishhis goal. However, Constantijn's aversion for dogs will make him want to walk away from the MiRo. This can lead to undesired results such as additional care needed from caretakers and Constantijn may end up being punished by not being able to go out on his own due to non-compliance from his walk with the MiRo. When this scenario occurs, his autonomy will be severely reduced and make him utterly depressed.19 +=== Positive effects === 20 20 21 - ==Importance ofAutonomy==21 +The PwD will feel elated that they were able to leave their room at all. Most PwDs are not able to walk around the premises independently, so having the autonomy to go on a walk increases their level of happiness. 22 22 23 - Autonomyis important for People with Dementiaasthat will make them more motivated[[(Deci & Ryan, 1985)>>http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7_5]] to walk with the MiRo. Being connected with oneselfand others [[(Han et al., 2015, p. 118)>>https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317515598857]] is crucialfor PwD. Thelack of autonomy isan insurmountable barrier to overcome for PwD. This is emphasized, because this factor outweighs any initial hurdles that may be introduced with the arrival of new technology such as the MiRo robot.23 +=== Negative effects === 24 24 25 - ==Claim==25 +The PwD will keep walking away from the dog which leads to undesired results, extra care needed from caretakers and the patient may be punished by not being able to go outside until someone (a human person) shows up to take them for a walk. This severely reduces their autonomy and as a result make them feel dissatisfied. 26 26 27 - Givenpositive and negative effects ofwalkingwiththe Miro,it is clear that people with opposingviews on dogs can still reap the benefits that come with walking with the MiRo. It should beotedthough that there are issues, which are mentionedunder [[Foundation.Operational Demands.Environments.WebHome||anchor="Technologies"]],which need to be addressed to mitigate any unnerving effects that the MiRohason PwD and theirsurrounding stakeholders.27 +== PwD who has fallen on the floor == 28 28 29 - Therefore,we claim thatPwD experience an increase in perceived autonomy compared to walking with a caretaker. In order tosupport the claim, we will experimentally verify whether the MiRo can provide effective guidance on a pre-determined route and that the regained autonomy outweighsdelayed assistance from human caretakers in case PwD find themselves in trouble during their walk.29 +=== Positive effects === 30 30 31 - Ourexperimental setupis mentionedunder:[[Test.WebHome]]31 +The PwD will be able to receive medical attention faster as the Miro can function as an alarm and send its (relative) location to the caretaker overseeing the ward. 32 32 33 +=== Negative effects === 33 33 34 - =Snoezelen with MiRo=35 +The PwD and the co-residents of the ward might be unnerved by the Miro's bark and the volume when trying to draw the attention of the caretaker. 35 35 36 - Assnoezelenisconsidered as an additional function, none of the [[Personas.Webhome]] constructed have attributes that would make them more orlessinclinedto engage inSnoezelen. For the purpose of Snoezelen, wedistinguishbetween two types of PwD. One thatlikes Snoezelenand onethat doesnot.37 +== PwD who is socially inclined and talkative == 37 37 38 -== P wD wholikesSnoezelen==39 +=== Positive effects === 39 39 40 - Thesensory stimuli produced by the Miro can calm down the PwD when they are distraught. Snoezelen helps with the stimulation of one's mind and encourages PwD to pet the miro to observea spectrum ofLEDs and listen tocalming and relaxingsounds.41 +=== Negative effects === 41 41 42 - However,if the PwD has any auditory or visualimpairments,then these could alter the experience and the effectiveness of Snoezelen with Miro. In addition, epillepsy, sensitive hearing or similar sensory disorders may cause the PwD to be overwhelmed. As such, the Miro should be able to adapt to each different PwD. Modifications include: changing the volume of sounds, removing (relatively) high-pitched noises and removing visual patterns that may induce epilleptic attacks.43 +== Claim == 43 43 45 += Snoezelen with Miro = 44 44 45 -== PwD who dislikes Snoezelen ==47 +== PwD who likes Snoezelen == 46 46 47 - Evenif thePwD isdisinterestedinitially, they may still havetheinnate desire to explore the association between touching the Miro and its response. Ifthe PwD decides afterwards that they do not wish tocontinue Snoezelen, they maystillbenefit from experiencing a mind stimulating novel activity. Otherwise, they may grow fond of Snoezelen in subsequent sessions.49 +=== Positive effects === 48 48 49 - PwDwho dislikes Snoezelen may experience similar negative effectsas the PwD who likes Snoezelen, but the former group will be more perceptive to these effects as it reinforces their already existing disliking for this activity.51 +=== Negative effects === 50 50 51 -== Claim==53 +== PwD who dislikes Snoezelen == 52 52 53 -Snoezelen with the MiRo may benefit those who need it. Whether Snoezelen with the MiRo is successful depends on factors such as: inclination of PwD, PwD's first impression (after one session) and customizability. People tend to implicitly reinforce their own biases and may be thrown off by the MiRo's appearance and behavior during Snoezelen. If the aforementioned factors are taken care of, then one can safely claim that PwD will become either more relaxed at best or not bothered at worst by the Miro at all. To emphasize on customizability, it is important to have the Miro programmed to accommodate for sensitivity of each different PwD. As failing to do so, may cause long-term mental trauma or physical injury for PwD. Due to the highly personalized approach in combination with technical limitations, this claim will **not** be evaluated. 54 - 55 +=== Positive effects === 55 55 57 +=== Negative effects === 56 56 57 - 59 +== Claim ==