Changes for page Claims
Last modified by Laura Ottevanger on 2022/04/05 13:59
From version
22.1


edited by Rohan Sobha
on 2022/03/22 20:23
on 2022/03/22 20:23
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version
7.1


edited by Rohan Sobha
on 2022/02/23 12:32
on 2022/02/23 12:32
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,67 +1,51 @@ 1 -As mentioned in [[Functions.WebHome]], there are two functions. However,dueto thescope of the course, we will focus on the first function:Walkingwith theMiRo. Dueto thescopeofthisprojectand the limitationsof the MiRo,wewillnot evaluateSnoezelenas our second function. It is howeverdescribed within thecontextofclaims to demonstratehow Snoezelen with a future MiRomay affectdifferentpersons with dementia.1 +As mentioned in [[Functions.WebHome]], there are two functions. For each described function, a claim can be formed about the positives as well as the negative effects of implementing each function. 2 2 3 -Key terms: Pe rson with Dementia (PwD)3 +Key terms: Patient with Dementia (PwD) 4 4 5 - Forthe both functions, we will outlinethe positive aswell as the negative effects for eachpersona and theirinteractionon the storyboard. Finally, we will construct a claim from these effects.5 += Walking with Miro = 6 6 7 -= WalkingwiththeMiRo =7 +== PwD who likes dogs == 8 8 9 -== Effectson Personas==9 +=== Positive effects === 10 10 11 - ===Cornelia(PwDwholikesdogs)===11 +PwDs are in a gloomy state of mind and have the desire to go for a walk. 12 12 13 - Afterwalking with theMiRo, Cornelia will feel happier as she was able to rekindle some nostalgic memories she obtained when walking with the former dog she used to own. In addition, her mood will increase as she managed to do some exercise. Cornelia's introvertednessand independence make her reluctant to bother her loved ones or caretakers to go on a walk with her. As such she is relieved that the MiRo allows her to regain some ofherformer autonomysheused to enjoy.13 +=== Negative effects === 14 14 15 - That beingsaid,she may grow fond of walking with theMiRo andexertown body by walking morethan she can handle at herage. Moreover,the MiRomight not be ableto assist herimmediatelyif Corneliagetsinjured herself bywalkingintoobstacles or tripping over the MiRo.15 +PwDs are either happier or grumpier after having walked with the Miro. 16 16 17 -== =Constantijn (PwD who dislikes dogs)===17 +== PwD who dislikes dogs == 18 18 19 - Afterwalking with the MiRo, Constantijn will feel elated that he was able to leave his room at all. Constantijn is known for his eagerness to talk to his co-residents and the MiRo allows him to fulfill his desire. Although he is less bothered by the lack of autonomy, it does providehim with a littleboost in self-confidence as he was ableto accomplishhis goal. However, Constantijn's aversion for dogs will make him want to walk away from the MiRo. This can lead to undesired results such as additional care needed from caretakers and Constantijn may end up being punished by not being able to go out on his own due to non-compliance from his walk with the MiRo. When this scenario occurs, his autonomy will be severely reduced and make him utterly depressed.19 +=== Positive effects === 20 20 21 -== ImportanceofAutonomy==21 +=== Negative effects === 22 22 23 - Autonomyis important forPeoplewithDementiaas thatwill make them moremotivated [[(Deci & Ryan, 1985)>>http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7_5]] to walk with the MiRo. Being connected with oneselfand others [[(Han et al., 2015, p. 118)>>https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317515598857]] is crucialfor PwD. Thelack of autonomyis an insurmountablebarrierto overcome for PwD. This isemphasized,because thisfactor outweighs any initialhurdles that may be introduced with the arrivalof new technology such as the MiRorobot.23 +== PwD who has fallen on the floor == 24 24 25 -== Claim==25 +=== Positive effects === 26 26 27 - Givenpositiveand negative effectsof walking with the Miro, it is clear that people with opposing views on dogs can still reap the benefits that come with walking with the MiRo. It should be noted though that there are issues, which are mentioned under [[Foundation.Operational Demands.Environments.WebHome||anchor="Technologies"]], which need to be addressed to mitigate any unnerving effects that the MiRo has on PwD and their surrounding stakeholders.27 +=== Negative effects === 28 28 29 - Therefore,we claim thatPwDexperience an increase in perceived autonomy compared towalking witha caretaker. Inordertosupport theclaim, we will experimentallyverify whether the MiRo canprovide effective guidanceon a pre-determinedrouteand that the regained autonomy outweighs delayed assistance from human caretakers in case PwD findthemselvesin trouble during their walk.29 +== PwD who is socially inclined and talkative == 30 30 31 - Ourexperimentalsetupis mentionedunder: [[Test.WebHome]]31 +=== Positive effects === 32 32 33 +=== Negative effects === 33 33 34 -= Snoezelen withMiRo=35 +== Claim == 35 35 36 -Snoezelen with the robot dog is unfortunately not possible with MiRo due to MiRo being limited in a couple of different areas. First of all, MiRo is very fragile. When one touches MiRos head, it moves a bit down each time. Secondly MiRos lights are just a few small LED lights. As Snoezelen would be done by elderly people who might have a visual impairment, it would be preferable to have bigger or more diffused lights so the PwD are able to see a change in colours. Finally, when people are petting the dog, it might be better if the robot dog would have some fur, it would feel more realistic. 37 -Future work would include incorporating Snoezelen. To incorporate Snoezelen, a new prototype of the robot should be created, once a new prototype has been created, an evaluation on how useful Snoezelen is with this new Prototype should be done as well. 37 += Snoezelen with Miro = 38 38 39 39 == PwD who likes Snoezelen == 40 40 41 41 === Positive effects === 42 42 43 -The sensory stimuli produced by the Miro can calm down the PwD when they are distraught. Snoezelen helps with the stimulation of one's mind and encourages PwD to pet the miro to observe a spectrum of LEDs and listen to calming and relaxing sounds. 44 - 45 45 === Negative effects === 46 46 47 -If the PwD has any auditory or visual impairments, these could alter the experience and the effectiveness of Snoezelen with Miro. In addition, epillepsy, sensitive hearing or similar sensory disorders may cause the PwD to be overwhelmed. As such, the Miro should be able to adapt to each different PwD. Modifications include: changing the volume of sounds, removing (relatively) high-pitched noises and removing visual patterns that may induce epilleptic attacks. 48 - 49 49 == PwD who dislikes Snoezelen == 50 50 51 51 === Positive effects === 52 52 53 -Even if the PwD is disinterested initially, they may still have the innate desire to explore the association between touching the Miro and its response. If the PwD then decides that it is not their cup of tea, they were at least suggested a new activity that stimulated their mind. Else, they may become fond of Snoezelen in subsequent sessions. 54 - 55 55 === Negative effects === 56 56 57 -Similar to the negative effects for PwD who are into Snoezelen, PwDs may get traumatized when the Miro expresses unexpected behavior or overstimulates them. These effects are augmented when PwD has no inclination for Snoezelen or similar activities at all. 58 - 59 59 == Claim == 60 - 61 -Whether the PwD likes/dislikes Snoezelen at first seems irrelevant for the outcome that PwD will become either more relaxed at best or not bothered at worst by the Miro at all. In order to justify this claim, the Miro must be programmed to accommodate for sensitivity of each PwD. As failing to do so, may cause long-term trauma or injury for PwD. 62 - 63 - 64 - 65 - 66 - 67 -