Changes for page Claims
Last modified by Laura Ottevanger on 2022/04/05 13:59
From version
21.1


edited by Rohan Sobha
on 2022/03/22 10:57
on 2022/03/22 10:57
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version
3.1


edited by Rohan Sobha
on 2022/02/23 12:29
on 2022/02/23 12:29
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,36 +1,52 @@ 1 -As mentioned in [[Functions.WebHome]], there are two functions. However,dueto thescope of the course, we will focus on the first function:Walkingwith theMiRo. Dueto thescopeofthisprojectandtheimitationsoftheMiRo, we willnotevaluateSnoezelen as our secondfunction.**Its claims will beonedunderfuture work and a possible evaluationmethod**1 +As mentioned in [[Functions.WebHome]], there are two functions. For each described function, a claim can be formed about the positives as well as the negative effects of implementing each function. 2 2 3 -Key terms: Pe rson with Dementia (PwD)3 +Key terms: Patient with Dementia (PwD) 4 4 5 - Mainfunction: **Walking withtheMiRo**5 += Walking with Miro = 6 6 7 - Forthe aformentioned function,wewill outline the positiveas well as the negativeeffectsfor each persona andtheir interaction on thestoryboard.Finally, we will construct a claim from these effects.7 +== PwD who likes dogs == 8 8 9 -== Effectson Personas==9 +=== Positive effects === 10 10 11 - ===Cornelia(PwDwholikesdogs)===11 +PwDs are in a gloomy state of mind and have the desire to go for a walk. 12 12 13 - Afterwalking with theMiRo, Cornelia will feel happier as she was able to rekindle some nostalgic memories she obtained when walking with the former dog she used to own. In addition, her mood will increase as she managed to do some exercise. Cornelia's introvertednessand independence make her reluctant to bother her loved ones or caretakers to go on a walk with her. As such she is relieved that the MiRo allows her to regain some ofherformer autonomysheused to enjoy.13 +=== Negative effects === 14 14 15 - That beingsaid,she may grow fond of walking with theMiRo andexertown body by walking morethan she can handle at herage. Moreover,the MiRomight not be ableto assist herimmediatelyif Corneliagetsinjured herself bywalkingintoobstacles or tripping over the MiRo.15 +PwDs are either happier or grumpier after having walked with the Miro. 16 16 17 -== =Constantijn (PwD who dislikes dogs)===17 +== PwD who dislikes dogs or who refuses to be led by a dog == 18 18 19 - Afterwalking with the MiRo, Constantijn will feel elated that he was able to leave his room at all. Constantijn is known for his eagerness to talk to his co-residents and the MiRo allows him to fulfill his desire. Although he is less bothered by the lack of autonomy, it does providehim with a littleboost in self-confidence as he was ableto accomplishhis goal. However, Constantijn's aversion for dogs will make him want to walk away from the MiRo. This can lead to undesired results such as additional care needed from caretakers and Constantijn may end up being punished by not being able to go out on his own due to non-compliance from his walk with the MiRo. When this scenario occurs, his autonomy will be severely reduced and make him utterly depressed.19 +=== Positive effects === 20 20 21 -== Importance of Autonomy == 22 22 23 -Autonomy is important for People with Dementia as that will make them more motivated [[(Deci & Ryan, 1985)>>http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7_5]] to walk with the MiRo. Being connected with oneself and others [[(Han et al., 2015, p. 118)>>https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317515598857]] is crucial for PwD. The lack of autonomy is an insurmountable barrier to overcome for PwD. This is emphasized, because this factor outweighs any initial hurdles that may be introduced with the arrival of new technology such as the MiRo robot. 24 24 25 -== Claim==23 +=== Negative effects === 26 26 27 - Givenpositive and negative effects ofwalkingwiththe Miro,it is clear that people with opposingviews on dogs can still reap the benefits that come with walking with the MiRo. It should beotedthough that there are issues, which are mentionedunder [[Foundation.Operational Demands.Environments.WebHome||anchor="Technologies"]],which need to be addressed to mitigate any unnerving effects that the MiRohason PwD and theirsurrounding stakeholders.25 +== PwD who has fallen on the floor == 28 28 29 - Therefore,we claim thatPwD experience an increase in perceived autonomy compared to walking with a caretaker. In order tosupport the claim, we will experimentally verify whether the MiRo can provide effective guidance on a pre-determined route and that the regained autonomy outweighsdelayed assistance from human caretakers in case PwD find themselves in trouble during their walk.27 +=== Positive effects === 30 30 31 - Ourexperimental setupis mentionedunder: [[Test.WebHome]]29 +=== Negative effects === 32 32 33 33 32 +== PwD who is socially inclined and talkative == 34 34 34 +=== Positive effects === 35 35 36 +=== Negative effects === 36 36 38 += Snoezelen with Miro = 39 + 40 +== PwD who likes Snoezelen == 41 + 42 +=== Positive effects === 43 + 44 +=== Negative effects === 45 + 46 +== PwD who dislikes Snoezelen == 47 + 48 +=== Positive effects === 49 + 50 +=== Negative effects === 51 + 52 +