Changes for page Claims
Last modified by Laura Ottevanger on 2022/04/05 13:59
From version
20.1


edited by Rohan Sobha
on 2022/03/18 16:03
on 2022/03/18 16:03
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version
5.1


edited by Rohan Sobha
on 2022/02/23 12:30
on 2022/02/23 12:30
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,34 +1,59 @@ 1 -As mentioned in [[Functions.WebHome]], there are two functions. However,dueto thescope of the course, we will focus on the first function:Walkingwith theMiRo. Dueto thescopeofthisprojectandtheimitationsoftheMiRo, we willnotevaluateSnoezelen as our secondfunction.**Its claims will beonedunderfuture work and a possible evaluationmethod**1 +As mentioned in [[Functions.WebHome]], there are two functions. For each described function, a claim can be formed about the positives as well as the negative effects of implementing each function. 2 2 3 -Key terms: Pe rson with Dementia (PwD)3 +Key terms: Patient with Dementia (PwD) 4 4 5 - Fortheaformentioned function, we will outlinethe positive aswell as the negative effects for eachpersona and theirinteractionon the storyboard. Finally, we will construct a claim from these effects.5 += Walking with Miro = 6 6 7 -== EffectsonPersonas ==7 +== PwD who likes dogs == 8 8 9 -=== Cornelia (PwD wholikesdogs)===9 +=== Positive effects === 10 10 11 - Afterwalking with the MiRo, Cornelia will feel happier asshe was able torekindlesome nostalgic memories she obtainedwhen walkingwith the formerdogshe usedto own. Inaddition, hermoodwill increase as shemanaged to do some exercise. Cornelia's introvertednessandindependence makeher reluctant to botherher lovedonesorcaretakersto go ona walkwith her.As such she is relieved that the MiRo allows her to regain some of her former autonomy she used to enjoy.11 +PwDs are in a gloomy state of mind and have the desire to go for a walk. 12 12 13 - Thatbeingsaid, she may grow fond of walking with the MiRo and exert her own body by walking more than she can handle at her age. Moreover,theMiRo might not be able to assist her immediately ifCornelia getsinjured herself by walking into obstacles or tripping over the MiRo.13 +=== Negative effects === 14 14 15 - === Constantijn(PwDwhodislikesdogs)===15 +PwDs are either happier or grumpier after having walked with the Miro. 16 16 17 - Afterwalking with the MiRo,Constantijn will feel elated that he was able to leave his roomat all. Constantijn is known for his eagerness to talk to his co-residents and the MiRo allows him to fulfill his desire. Although he is less bothered by the lack of autonomy, it does provide him with a little boost in self-confidence as he was able to accomplish his goal. However, Constantijn's aversion for dogs will make him want to walk away from the MiRo. This can lead to undesired results such as additional care needed from caretakers and Constantijn may end up being punished by not being able to go out on his own due to non-compliance from his walk with the MiRo. When this scenario occurs, his autonomy will be severely reduced and make him utterly depressed.17 +=== Claim === 18 18 19 -== Importance ofAutonomy ==19 +== PwD who dislikes dogs or who refuses to be led by a dog == 20 20 21 - Autonomyis important forPeople with Dementia asthat will makethem more motivated[[(Deci & Ryan, 1985)>>http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7_5]] to walk with the MiRo. Being connected with oneselfand others [[(Han et al., 2015, p. 118)>>https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317515598857]] is crucialfor PwD. Thelack of autonomy isan insurmountable barrier to overcome for PwD. This is emphasized, because this factor outweighs any initial hurdles that may be introduced with the arrival of new technology such as the MiRo robot.21 +=== Positive effects === 22 22 23 -== Claim == 24 24 25 -Given positive and negative effects of walking with the Miro, it is clear that people with opposing views on dogs can still reap the benefits that come with walking with the MiRo. It should be noted though that there are issues, which are mentioned under [[Foundation.Operational Demands.Environments.WebHome||anchor="Technologies"]], which need to be addressed to mitigate any unnerving effects that the MiRo has on PwD and their surrounding stakeholders. 26 26 27 - Therefore,weclaim that PwD experience an increase in perceived autonomy compared to walkingwithacaretaker. In order to support the claim, we will experimentallyverifywhether the MiRo can provide effective guidance on a pre-determined route and that the regained autonomy outweighsdelayed assistance from human caretakers in case PwD find themselves in trouble during their walk.25 +=== Negative effects === 28 28 29 - Ourexperimentalsetupismentionedunder: [[Test.WebHome]]27 +== PwD who has fallen on the floor == 30 30 29 +=== Positive effects === 31 31 31 +=== Negative effects === 32 32 33 +=== Claim === 33 33 35 +== PwD who is socially inclined and talkative == 34 34 37 +=== Positive effects === 38 + 39 +=== Negative effects === 40 + 41 +=== Claim === 42 + 43 += Snoezelen with Miro = 44 + 45 +== PwD who likes Snoezelen == 46 + 47 +=== Positive effects === 48 + 49 +=== Negative effects === 50 + 51 +=== Claim === 52 + 53 +== PwD who dislikes Snoezelen == 54 + 55 +=== Positive effects === 56 + 57 +=== Negative effects === 58 + 59 +=== Claim ===