Changes for page Test

Summary

• Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-XWiki.VSaikkonen
	1	+XWiki.ahamalainen

Content

...	...	@@ -51,7 +51,6 @@
51	51	1. Complete questionnaire 3 (extended version).
52	52	1. Have a short interview during downtime (prepared questions).
53	53
54		-
55	55	We used the "Wizard of Oz" method for recognizing agreement and disagreement, to make sure that the whole process did not depend on voice recognition being good enough. In practice, this meant that someone was pressing "y" and "n" on the keyboard according to the participants answers in a place the participant did not see, such as behind them.
56	56
57	57	== Material ==
...	...	@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@
61	61	Below are listed the contents of the three questionnares:
62	62
63	63	Questionnare 1:
	63	+
64	64	* Consent Form and Disclaimers
65	65	* Control for robot version A
66	66	** 8 questions from the [[EVEA>>https://www.ucm.es/data/cont/docs/39-2013-04-19-EVEA%20-%20Datasheet.pdf]] questionnaire
...	...	@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@
67	67	** 4 questions from the [[Godspeed>>https://www.bartneck.de/2008/03/11/the-godspeed-questionnaire-series/]] questionnaire
68	68
69	69	Questionnare 2:
	70	+
70	70	* Questions about robot version A
71	71	** 3 food-related questions of our own (5-point Likert scale)
72	72	** 2 music-related questions of our own (5-point Likert scale)
...	...	@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@
75	75	** 4 questions from the [[Godspeed>>https://www.bartneck.de/2008/03/11/the-godspeed-questionnaire-series/]] questionnaire
76	76
77	77	Questionnare 3:
	79	+
78	78	* Questions about robot version B
79	79	** 3 food-related questions of our own (5-point Likert scale)
80	80	** 2 music-related questions of our own (5-point Likert scale)
...	...	@@ -220,9 +220,11 @@
220	220	|P-value|0.01|0.17
221	221
222	222	== Qualitative Results: Quotes and observations ==
	225	+
223	223	As described, during the experiment, the interaction between the participants and the robot was observed. This section will elaborate on findings from those observations and quotes from participants.
224	224
225	225	After each interaction section, the the participant was asked how the interaction with the robot felt. From the interaction with the less intelligent version of the robot, some interesting quotes were:
	229	+
226	226	* “The robot was bit direct.”
227	227	* “Efficient interaction, but less friendly than the other interaction.”
228	228	* “Strange, I did not catch the questions.”
...	...	@@ -231,6 +231,7 @@
231	231	Some of these quotes stress the fact that the less intelligent prototype interaction was rather short and direct. It should be said that the sequence of the interactions seemed to have some impact on how the participants experienced the interaction. Some participants who first experienced the less intelligent prototype were smiling and positively surprised during this interaction, while others who first experienced the intelligent prototype were over all smiling less while interacting with the less intelligent robot.
232	232
233	233	From the interaction with the intelligent version of the robot, some interesting quotes were:
	238	+
234	234	* “I think it’s perfect, the robot is very friendly. I liked that the robot sat down with me after a while.”
235	235	* “The interaction felt quite natural.”
236	236	* “Nao answered pretty quickly, you don’t have to wait for an answer. It is quite a happy robot.”
...	...	@@ -270,14 +270,6 @@
270	270
271	271	The long-term effects of this are unclear and require further study. The short-term experiment shows promising results to further develop such solutions, but to also conduct experiments to study the long-term effects of such a solution. With a longer experiment, the development of the human-robot interaction and the effect of constant mealtime reminders would likely begin to show, which could cause differences to the presented short-term results, by for example the robot becoming more enjoyable as it becomes familiar.
272	272
273		-<ol>
274		-<li>Does the robot remind the PwD of their hunger?</li>
275		-<li>Does the music make the eating more enjoyable for the PwD?</li>
276		-<li>Does the PwD experience less negative emotions, such as agitation, sadness, embarrassment, after the interaction with the 'intelligent' robot?</li>
277		-<li>* Does the robot cause PwD to eat more regularly?</li>
278		-</ol>
279		-
280		-
281	281	= Appendix =
282	282
283	283	== Experiment introduction for participants ==