Changes for page Test
Last modified by Sofia Kostakonti on 2022/04/05 14:08
From version
85.1


edited by Aleksanteri Hämäläinen
on 2022/04/03 17:49
on 2022/04/03 17:49
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version
15.1


edited by Marlein Vogels
on 2022/03/15 14:40
on 2022/03/15 14:40
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
Details
- Page properties
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -XWiki.a hamalainen1 +XWiki.MarleinVogels - Content
-
... ... @@ -2,21 +2,11 @@ 2 2 3 3 People with dementia often forget to eat and drink, leading to dehydration, malnutrition and decreased wellbeing in general. Our prototype engages in discourses to remind PwD to have lunch and drink water, using the Nao robot platform. The discourse aims to reming the PwD without causing any anxiety or embarrassment which a traditional "alarm" system could cause, and keep them company throughout these activities. 4 4 5 -The four research questions studied in this evaluation are: 5 +RQ1: "Does the robot cause PwD to eat more regularly?" 6 +RQ2: "Does the PwD experience less negative emotions, such as agitation, sadness, embarrassment, after the interaction with the 'intelligent' robot?" 7 +RQ3: "Does the robot remind the PwD of their hunger?" 8 +RQ4: "Does the music make the eating more enjoyable for the PwD?" 6 6 7 -{{html}} 8 - 9 -<ol> 10 -<li>Does the robot remind the PwD of their hunger?</li> 11 -<li>Does the music make the eating more enjoyable for the PwD?</li> 12 -<li>Does the PwD experience less negative emotions, such as agitation, sadness, embarrassment, after the interaction with the 'intelligent' robot?</li> 13 -<li>* Does the robot cause PwD to eat more regularly?</li> 14 -</ol> 15 - 16 -* This research question is difficult due to the practical limitations in designing the experimental setup and as such is left to lesser importance. 17 - 18 -{{/html}} 19 - 20 20 = Method = 21 21 22 22 The prototype is evaluated with an in-person experiment with multiple participants. In the experiment, the participants will be asked to pretend to be PwD and act accordingly with/without the prototype. ... ... @@ -53,17 +53,9 @@ 53 53 54 54 For the experiments, we'll be using the NAO robot platform, as well as a laptop for the participants to complete the questionnaires on. The questionnaire will be a combination of questions regarding the emotional state of the participants, their interaction with the robot, and the music included in the interaction. Food will be made available to see and measure how much people will eat. 55 55 56 -Questionnaires: 57 -Consent Form and Disclaimers 58 -8 questions from the [[EVEA>>https://www.ucm.es/data/cont/docs/39-2013-04-19-EVEA%20-%20Datasheet.pdf]] questionnaire 59 -4 questions from the [[Godspeed>>https://www.bartneck.de/2008/03/11/the-godspeed-questionnaire-series/]] questionnaire 60 -3 food-related questions of our own (5-point Likert scale) 61 -2 music-related questions of our own (5-point Likert scale) 62 - 63 63 == Practicalities == 64 64 65 65 Beforehand: 66 - 67 67 * Do a practice round by ourselves 68 68 ** Film this 69 69 * Contact other groups and decide on a time slot ... ... @@ -73,7 +73,6 @@ 73 73 * Buy snacks 74 74 75 75 During: 76 - 77 77 1. Give starting questionnare to fill while people are waiting for the previous participant 78 78 2. Guide the participant to the testing spot 79 79 3. Inform the participant where the snacks are ... ... @@ -83,8 +83,8 @@ 83 83 7. Conduct the questionnare for the participant 84 84 8. Give the participant the end-questionnare 85 85 86 -Other practicalities during: 87 87 68 +Other practicalities during: 88 88 * We will use the "Wizard of Oz" method for recognizing agreement and disagreement, to make sure that the whole process does not depend on voice recegnition being good enough 89 89 ** Someone will press eg. "y" and "n" on the keyboard according to the participants answers 90 90 * We will change the order in which the smart and basic versions are for each participant ... ... @@ -91,175 +91,20 @@ 91 91 ** this way if someone doesn't show up, we don't get skewed amounts 92 92 93 93 After: 94 - 95 95 * Analyze results 96 96 97 97 = Results = 98 98 99 -The results were gathered from 19 personnel, all of whom interacted first with one version of the robot and then the other. 10 of the participants interacted first with the simple version, nine having their first interaction with the advanced version. 100 100 101 -== Eating == 102 102 103 -{{html}} 104 -<img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/EatingComp.png?rev=1.1" alt="Results on the eating of the test personas" style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=750/> 105 -{{/html}} 106 - 107 -(% style="text-align:center" %) 108 -Figure 1: Results on the eating of the test personas during the experiment 109 - 110 -Simple robot: 111 - 112 -* 16% ate 113 -* 33% of those would not have eaten without the robot 114 - 115 -Advanced robot: 116 - 117 -* 32% ate 118 -* 67% of those would not have eaten without the robot 119 - 120 -== Music == 121 - 122 -{{html}} 123 -<img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/MusicEnjoyable.png?rev=1.1" alt="Effects of music on the test personnel" style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=1250/> 124 -{{/html}} 125 - 126 -(% style="text-align:center" %) 127 -Figure 2: Answers of the test personas regarding music 128 - 129 - 130 -== EVEA (Mood) == 131 - 132 -{{html}} 133 -<img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/MoodChangeDumb.png?rev=1.1" alt="Measured moods and changes for the simple robot" style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=750/> 134 -{{/html}} 135 - 136 -(% style="text-align:center" %) 137 -Figure 3: Median measured moods for the simple version of the robot 138 - 139 -{{html}} 140 -<img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/MoodChangeSmart.png?rev=1.1" alt="Measured moods and changes for the advanced version of the robot" style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=750/> 141 -{{/html}} 142 - 143 -(% style="text-align:center" %) 144 -Figure 4: Median measured moods for the advanced version of the robot 145 - 146 -(% style="text-align:center" %) 147 -Table 1: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the hypothesis that the mood changed during the interaction with the simple robot 148 - 149 -|=Mood|=Happiness|=Anxiety|=Sadness|=Anger 150 -|Statistic|37|5|4|14 151 -|P-value|0.54|0.01|0.01|0.45 152 - 153 -(% style="text-align:center" %) 154 -Table 2: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the mood changed during the interaction with the advanced robot 155 - 156 -|=Mood|=Happiness|=Anxiety|=Sadness|=Anger 157 -|Statistic|32|11|2|17 158 -|P-value|0.18|0.01|0.01|0.45 159 - 160 -(% style="text-align:center" %) 161 -Table 3: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the mood decreased during the interaction with the simple robot 162 - 163 -|=Mood|=Anxiety|=Sadness|=Anger 164 -|Statistic|81|53|29 165 -|P-value|0.01|0.00|0.23 166 - 167 -(% style="text-align:center" %) 168 -Table 4: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the mood decreased during the interaction with the advanced robot 169 - 170 -|=Mood|=Anxiety|=Sadness|=Anger 171 -|Statistic|32|149|52 172 -|P-value|0.00|0.01|0.07 173 - 174 -(% style="text-align:center" %) 175 -Table 5: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the mood increased during the interaction with the simple robot 176 - 177 -|=Mood|=Happiness 178 -|Statistic|37 179 -|P-value|0.27 180 - 181 -(% style="text-align:center" %) 182 -Table 6: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the mood increased during the interaction with the advanced robot 183 - 184 -|=Mood|=Happiness 185 -|Statistic|32 186 -|P-value|0.09 187 - 188 -(% style="text-align:center" %) 189 -Table 7: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the hypothesis that the mood changes with the simple and advanced robots during the interaction are different 190 - 191 -|=Mood|=Happiness|=Anxiety|=Sadness|=Anger 192 -|Statistic|92|49|85|69 193 -|P-value|0.92|0.07|0.71|0.31 194 - 195 -== Godspeed == 196 - 197 -{{html}} 198 -<img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/friendly-hist.png?rev=1.1" alt="Effects of music on the test personnel" style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=750/> 199 -{{/html}} 200 - 201 -(% style="text-align:center" %) 202 -Figure 5: Answers to the statement 'I thought the robot was friendly' 203 - 204 -{{html}} 205 -<img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/pleasant-hist.png?rev=1.1" alt="Answers to the statement 'I thought the robot was pleasant'." style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=750/> 206 -{{/html}} 207 - 208 -(% style="text-align:center" %) 209 -Figure 6: Answers to the statement 'I thought the robot was pleasant' 210 - 211 -{{html}} 212 -<img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/godspeed-barchart.png?rev=1.1" alt="Godspeed questionnaire median comparison'." style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=750/> 213 -{{/html}} 214 - 215 -(% style="text-align:center" %) 216 -Figure 7: Median measured Godspeed questionnaire dimensions 217 - 218 - 219 -(% style="text-align:center" %) 220 -Table 8: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the advanced robot scored higher in the perceived dimensions 221 - 222 -|=Dimension|=Likeability|=Intelligence 223 -|Statistic|36|70 224 -|P-value|0.01|0.17 225 - 226 226 = Discussion = 227 -Analysis the results surfaced some minor issues in the experiment, such as the lack of comparison with two robots of similar features, with and without music. Also the practical limitations in the setup, such as the lack of different food options and some participants being aware of the design goals of the prototype could have interfered with the natural flow of the intercourse. With these limitations, the research method was successful in extracting differences within the robots and brought up additional directions for future research. 228 228 229 -The most interesting direction for future research would be the longer term studying of the effect of mealtime reminders on the health of the test subjects. The longer term health study would uncover the effect on eating frequency and the development of the relationship with the robot, for example would the test subjects that were first excited about the novel interaction with the robot, develop negative feelings about the supervision that the robot is conducting into their personal life. 230 230 231 -Another topic to study is the differences with and without music. The effects of music could be studied with the music tailored to personal taste and all versions of the robot with and without the music playback included in the interaction. This would allow to pinpoint the effects of music, without the other features causing variance. 232 232 233 233 = Conclusions = 234 234 235 -From the results we can see that the more advanced robot shows advantages over the simple version in many categories. Hints of better performance in other categories can be seen, but no conclusions should be drawn from the ones that lack the statistical significance. 236 - 237 -In improving the eating, it seems that both robots have limited success in causing the people to eat as seen in Figure 1, they could cause the patients to eat more regularly, if triggered by timers or other suitable systems. It also seems that the advanced robot is better in the reminding, by a slight margin. However, the long term effects of reminding should be researched more to conclude whether the usage of the demonstrated robot platform or similar would cause the patients to eat more regularly. It is also unclear how the test setup and the limited choice of food affected the eating. 238 - 239 -Based on the answers of the participants regarding music seen in Figure 2, it seems that most of them were either indifferent or liked the music. Also, as the test personnel find the advanced robot more likeable with a 5% confidence limit (Table 7), and the advanced version was the only version with music, it seems likely that the music does make the interaction more pleasant for the personas. However, some of the likeability might be due to the other advanced features of the robot and thus more research is needed to conclude the effect of the music. 240 - 241 -The EVEA and partial Godspeed result can be seen in Figures 3-7 and Tables 1-8. The results show that with reasonable confidence (5% confidence limit), both versions of the robot decreased sadness and anxiety in the test personas. Hints are shown (10% confidence limit) that the advanced robot also decreases feelings of anger and increases happiness, while the simple robot fails to show similar results. However, in Table 7 we can see that the statistical differences in the mood differences during the interactions with the different versions are not highly significant. 242 - 243 -A Wilcoxon signed rank test for the partial Godspeed test shows in Table 8 that with high confidence (1% confidence limit), the intelligent robot is more likeable in comparison to the simple robot. With these results it is likely that the more advanced robot is slightly preferrable and the personas might experience less negative emotions after the interaction with the robots, but it is slightly unclear if the effect is more powerful with the advanced robot. 244 - 245 - 246 246 = Appendix = 247 247 248 -== Experiment introduction for participants == 249 - 250 - 251 - 252 -Hi, we are <NAME> and <NAME> from the TU Delft Socio-Cognitive Engeering course Group 1, thank you for participating in our prototype evaluation experiment. The experiment is being conducted as a part of the TU Delft course on Socio-Cognitive Engineering and aims to evaluate the prototype designed as a part of the course. The evaluated prototype is based on the Nao robot-platform and is intended to improve the wellbeing of people suffering of dementia. 253 - 254 -Consuming food and/or water can be a consequence of the interaction between you and the robot. Therefore, we would like to ask you if you have any allergies. If you have a form of Diabetes, please let us know before we start the first part of the experiment. You are strongly encouraged to share any other health conditions that can possibly be relevant to take into account when doing an experiment with robots and food with us. 255 - 256 -The link between the stimuli of the Nao-robot and the triggering of epileptic seizures is yet unknown. If you have ever experienced epileptic seizures, please let us know. Then, we could see if any special precautions are needed. 257 - 258 -The experiment will last for approximately 15-20 minutes, and consists of two interaction sections with the Nao robot, as well as questionnaires before, between and after the sections. We kindly ask you to act naturally during the experiment and fill the questionnaires truthfully and intuitively. Remember that we are evaluating the prototypes performance, not yours. You can stop the experiment at any time. 259 - 260 -We will be collecting data of the questionnaires and recording some experiments, do you agree with your experiment being recorded? All data excluding the recordings will be anonymised before analysis and storage. The recordings will not be shared with third parties. After the experiment you have the right to ask for information about the collected data and revoke the right to use it. We kindly ask you not to share any information about the experiment with other participants. 261 - Do you have any questions? 262 - 263 263 == After research interview == 264 264 265 265 Setup: ... ... @@ -280,3 +280,7 @@ 280 280 - With the more intelligent version? 281 281 - With the less intelligent version? 282 282 - What did you feel like when the robot suggested you should eat/drink? 109 + 110 + 111 + 112 +
- EatingComp.png
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XWiki.VSaikkonen - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -83.6 KB - Content
- MoodChangeDumb.png
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XWiki.VSaikkonen - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -27.5 KB - Content
- MoodChangeSmart.png
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XWiki.VSaikkonen - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -27.7 KB - Content
- MusicEnjoyable.png
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XWiki.VSaikkonen - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -145.2 KB - Content
- friendly-hist.png
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XWiki.VSaikkonen - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -19.2 KB - Content
- godspeed-barchart.png
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XWiki.VSaikkonen - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -15.9 KB - Content
- pleasant-hist.png
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XWiki.VSaikkonen - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -19.6 KB - Content