Changes for page Test

Last modified by Sofia Kostakonti on 2022/04/05 14:08

From version Icon 77.1 Icon
edited by Aleksanteri Hämäläinen
on 2022/04/03 17:46
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 61.1 Icon
edited by Veikko Saikkonen
on 2022/04/01 14:49
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -XWiki.ahamalainen
1 +XWiki.VSaikkonen
Content
... ... @@ -2,24 +2,13 @@
2 2  
3 3  People with dementia often forget to eat and drink, leading to dehydration, malnutrition and decreased wellbeing in general. Our prototype engages in discourses to remind PwD to have lunch and drink water, using the Nao robot platform. The discourse aims to reming the PwD without causing any anxiety or embarrassment which a traditional "alarm" system could cause, and keep them company throughout these activities.
4 4  
5 -The four research questions studied in this evaluation are:
5 +RQ1: "Does the robot cause PwD to eat more regularly?"*
6 +RQ2: "Does the robot remind the PwD of their hunger?"
7 +RQ3: "Does the music make the eating more enjoyable for the PwD?"
8 +RQ4: "Does the PwD experience less negative emotions, such as agitation, sadness, embarrassment, after the interaction with the 'intelligent' robot?"
6 6  
7 -{{html}}
10 +'*' This research question is difficult due to the practical limitations in designing the experimental setup and as such is left to lesser importance.
8 8  
9 -<ul>
10 -<li>1. Does the robot cause PwD to eat more regularly?</li>
11 -
12 -<li>2. Does the robot remind the PwD of their hunger?</li>
13 -
14 -<li>3. Does the music make the eating more enjoyable for the PwD?</li>
15 -
16 -<li>4. Does the PwD experience less negative emotions, such as agitation, sadness, embarrassment, after the interaction with the 'intelligent' robot?</li>
17 -</ul>
18 -
19 -{{/html}}
20 -
21 -\* This research question is difficult due to the practical limitations in designing the experimental setup and as such is left to lesser importance.
22 -
23 23  = Method =
24 24  
25 25  The prototype is evaluated with an in-person experiment with multiple participants. In the experiment, the participants will be asked to pretend to be PwD and act accordingly with/without the prototype.
... ... @@ -108,8 +108,12 @@
108 108  {{/html}}
109 109  
110 110  (% style="text-align:center" %)
111 -Figure 1: Results on the eating of the test personas during the experiment
100 +Figure: Results on the eating of the test personas during the experiment
112 112  
102 +|=Version|=Did not eat|=Ate|=Would not have eaten without the robot|\\
103 +|Simple|16|3|1
104 +|Advanced|13|6|4
105 +
113 113  Simple robot:
114 114  
115 115  * 16% ate
... ... @@ -120,16 +120,6 @@
120 120  * 32% ate
121 121  * 67% of those would not have eaten without the robot
122 122  
123 -== Music ==
124 -
125 -{{html}}
126 -<img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/MusicEnjoyable.png?rev=1.1" alt="Effects of music on the test personnel" style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=1250/>
127 -{{/html}}
128 -
129 -(% style="text-align:center" %)
130 -Figure 2: Answers of the test personas regarding music
131 -
132 -
133 133  == EVEA (Mood) ==
134 134  
135 135  {{html}}
... ... @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@
137 137  {{/html}}
138 138  
139 139  (% style="text-align:center" %)
140 -Figure 3: Median measured moods for the simple version of the robot
123 +Figure: Median measured moods for the simple version of the robot
141 141  
142 142  {{html}}
143 143  <img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/MoodChangeSmart.png?rev=1.1" alt="Measured moods and changes for the advanced version of the robot" style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=750/>
... ... @@ -144,10 +144,10 @@
144 144  {{/html}}
145 145  
146 146  (% style="text-align:center" %)
147 -Figure 4: Median measured moods for the advanced version of the robot
130 +Figure: Median measured moods for the advanced version of the robot
148 148  
149 149  (% style="text-align:center" %)
150 -Table 1: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the hypothesis that the mood changed during the interaction with the simple robot
133 +Table: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the hypothesis that the mood changed during the interaction with the simple robot
151 151  
152 152  |=Mood|=Happiness|=Anxiety|=Sadness|=Anger
153 153  |Statistic|37|5|4|14
... ... @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@
154 154  |P-value|0.54|0.01|0.01|0.45
155 155  
156 156  (% style="text-align:center" %)
157 -Table 2: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the mood changed during the interaction with the advanced robot
140 +Table: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the mood changed during the interaction with the advanced robot
158 158  
159 159  |=Mood|=Happiness|=Anxiety|=Sadness|=Anger
160 160  |Statistic|32|11|2|17
... ... @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@
161 161  |P-value|0.18|0.01|0.01|0.45
162 162  
163 163  (% style="text-align:center" %)
164 -Table 3: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the mood decreased during the interaction with the simple robot
147 +Table: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the mood decreased during the interaction with the simple robot
165 165  
166 166  |=Mood|=Anxiety|=Sadness|=Anger
167 167  |Statistic|81|53|29
... ... @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@
168 168  |P-value|0.01|0.00|0.23
169 169  
170 170  (% style="text-align:center" %)
171 -Table 4: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the mood decreased during the interaction with the advanced robot
154 +Table: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the mood decreased during the interaction with the advanced robot
172 172  
173 173  |=Mood|=Anxiety|=Sadness|=Anger
174 174  |Statistic|32|149|52
... ... @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@
175 175  |P-value|0.00|0.01|0.07
176 176  
177 177  (% style="text-align:center" %)
178 -Table 5: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the mood increased during the interaction with the simple robot
161 +Table: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the mood increased during the interaction with the simple robot
179 179  
180 180  |=Mood|=Happiness
181 181  |Statistic|37
... ... @@ -182,19 +182,21 @@
182 182  |P-value|0.27
183 183  
184 184  (% style="text-align:center" %)
185 -Table 6: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the mood increased during the interaction with the advanced robot
168 +Table: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the mood increased during the interaction with the advanced robot
186 186  
187 187  |=Mood|=Happiness
188 188  |Statistic|32
189 189  |P-value|0.09
190 190  
191 -(% style="text-align:center" %)
192 -Table 7: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the hypothesis that the mood changes with the simple and advanced robots during the interaction are different
174 +== Music ==
193 193  
194 -|=Mood|=Happiness|=Anxiety|=Sadness|=Anger
195 -|Statistic|92|49|85|69
196 -|P-value|0.92|0.07|0.71|0.31
176 +{{html}}
177 +<img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/MusicEnjoyable.png?rev=1.1" alt="Effects of music on the test personnel" style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=1250/>
178 +{{/html}}
197 197  
180 +(% style="text-align:center" %)
181 +Figure: Answers of the test personas regarding music
182 +
198 198  == Godspeed ==
199 199  
200 200  {{html}}
... ... @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@
202 202  {{/html}}
203 203  
204 204  (% style="text-align:center" %)
205 -Figure 5: Answers to the statement 'I thought the robot was friendly'
190 +Figure: Answers to the statement 'I thought the robot was friendly'
206 206  
207 207  {{html}}
208 208  <img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/pleasant-hist.png?rev=1.1" alt="Answers to the statement 'I thought the robot was pleasant'." style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=750/>
... ... @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@
209 209  {{/html}}
210 210  
211 211  (% style="text-align:center" %)
212 -Figure 6: Answers to the statement 'I thought the robot was pleasant'
197 +Figure: Answers to the statement 'I thought the robot was pleasant'
213 213  
214 214  {{html}}
215 215  <img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/godspeed-barchart.png?rev=1.1" alt="Godspeed questionnaire median comparison'." style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=750/>
... ... @@ -216,36 +216,24 @@
216 216  {{/html}}
217 217  
218 218  (% style="text-align:center" %)
219 -Figure 7: Median measured Godspeed questionnaire dimensions
204 +Figure: Median measured Godspeed questionnaire dimensions
220 220  
221 -
222 -(% style="text-align:center" %)
223 -Table 8: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the advanced robot scored higher in the perceived dimensions
224 -
225 225  |=Dimension|=Likeability|=Intelligence
226 226  |Statistic|36|70
227 227  |P-value|0.01|0.17
228 228  
229 -= Discussion =
230 -Analysis the results surfaced some minor issues in the experiment, such as the lack of comparison with two robots of similar features, with and without music. Also the practical limitations in the setup, such as the lack of different food options and some participants being aware of the design goals of the prototype could have interfered with the natural flow of the intercourse. With these limitations, the research method was successful in extracting differences within the robots and brought up additional directions for future research.
210 +(% style="text-align:center" %)
211 +Table: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the advanced robot scored higher in the perceived dimensions
231 231  
232 -The most interesting direction for future research would be the longer term studying of the effect of mealtime reminders on the health of the test subjects. The longer term health study would uncover the effect on eating frequency and the development of the relationship with the robot, for example would the test subjects that were first excited about the novel interaction with the robot, develop negative feelings about the supervision that the robot is conducting into their personal life.
233 -
234 -Another topic to study is the differences with and without music. The effects of music could be studied with the music tailored to personal taste and all versions of the robot with and without the music playback included in the interaction. This would allow to pinpoint the effects of music, without the other features causing variance.
235 -
236 236  = Conclusions =
237 237  
238 -From the results we can see that the more advanced robot shows advantages over the simple version in many categories. Hints of better performance in other categories can be seen, but no conclusions should be drawn from the ones that lack the statistical significance.
215 +From the results we can see that the more advanced robot
239 239  
240 -In improving the eating, it seems that both robots have limited success in causing the people to eat as seen in Figure 1, they could cause the patients to eat more regularly, if triggered by timers or other suitable systems. It also seems that the advanced robot is better in the reminding, by a slight margin. However, the long term effects of reminding should be researched more to conclude whether the usage of the demonstrated robot platform or similar would cause the patients to eat more regularly. It is also unclear how the test setup and the limited choice of food affected the eating.
241 241  
242 -Based on the answers of the participants regarding music seen in Figure 2, it seems that most of them were either indifferent or liked the music. Also, as the test personnel find the advanced robot more likeable with a 5% confidence limit (Table 7), and the advanced version was the only version with music, it seems likely that the music does make the interaction more pleasant for the personas. However, some of the likeability might be due to the other advanced features of the robot and thus more research is needed to conclude the effect of the music.
218 += Discussion =
243 243  
244 -The EVEA and partial Godspeed result can be seen in Figures 3-7 and Tables 1-8. The results show that with reasonable confidence (5% confidence limit), both versions of the robot decreased sadness and anxiety in the test personas. Hints are shown (10% confidence limit) that the advanced robot also decreases feelings of anger and increases happiness, while the simple robot fails to show similar results. However, in Table 7 we can see that the statistical differences in the mood differences during the interactions with the different versions are not highly significant.
245 245  
246 -A Wilcoxon signed rank test for the partial Godspeed test shows in Table 8 that with high confidence (1% confidence limit), the intelligent robot is more likeable in comparison to the simple robot. With these results it is likely that the more advanced robot is slightly preferrable and the personas might experience less negative emotions after the interaction with the robots, but it is slightly unclear if the effect is more powerful with the advanced robot.
247 247  
248 -
249 249  = Appendix =
250 250  
251 251  == Experiment introduction for participants ==