Changes for page Test
Last modified by Sofia Kostakonti on 2022/04/05 14:08
From version
71.1


edited by Veikko Saikkonen
on 2022/04/01 15:29
on 2022/04/01 15:29
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version
72.1


edited by Veikko Saikkonen
on 2022/04/01 15:39
on 2022/04/01 15:39
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -215,6 +215,13 @@ 215 215 |Statistic|36|70 216 216 |P-value|0.01|0.17 217 217 218 += Discussion = 219 +Analysis the results surfaced some minor issues in the experiment, such as the lack of comparison with two robots of similar features, with and without music. Also the practical limitations in the setup, such as the lack of different food options and some participants being aware of the design goals of the prototype could have interfered with the natural flow of the intercourse. With these limitations, the research method was successful in extracting differences within the robots and brought up additional directions for future research. 220 + 221 +The most interesting direction for future research would be the longer term studying of the effect of mealtime reminders on the health of the test subjects. The longer term health study would uncover the effect on eating frequency and the development of the relationship with the robot, for example would the test subjects that were first excited about the novel interaction with the robot, develop negative feelings about the supervision that the robot is conducting into their personal life. 222 + 223 +Another topic to study is the differences with and without music. The effects of music could be studied with the music tailored to personal taste and all versions of the robot with and without the music playback included in the interaction. This would allow to pinpoint the effects of music, without the other features causing variance. 224 + 218 218 = Conclusions = 219 219 220 220 From the results we can see that the more advanced robot shows advantages over the simple version in many categories. Hints of better performance in other categories can be seen, but no conclusions should be drawn from the ones that lack the statistical significance. ... ... @@ -228,10 +228,6 @@ 228 228 A Wilcoxon signed rank test for the partial Godspeed test shows in Table 8 that with high confidence (1% confidence limit), the intelligent robot is more likeable in comparison to the simple robot. With these results it is likely that the more advanced robot is slightly preferrable and the personas might experience less negative emotions after the interaction with the robots, but it is slightly unclear if the effect is more powerful with the advanced robot. 229 229 230 230 231 -= Discussion = 232 - 233 - 234 - 235 235 = Appendix = 236 236 237 237 == Experiment introduction for participants ==