Skip to Content

Changes for page Test

Last modified by Sofia Kostakonti on 2022/04/05 14:08
From version Icon 69.2 Icon
edited by Veikko Saikkonen
on 2022/04/01 15:24
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 67.1 Icon
edited by Veikko Saikkonen
on 2022/04/01 14:57
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@
109 109  * 32% ate
110 110  * 67% of those would not have eaten without the robot
111 111  
112 +
112 112  == Music ==
113 113  
114 114  {{html}}
... ... @@ -177,13 +177,6 @@
177 177  |Statistic|32
178 178  |P-value|0.09
179 179  
180 -(% style="text-align:center" %)
181 -Table 7: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the hypothesis that the mood changes with the simple and advanced robots during the interaction are different
182 -
183 -|=Mood|=Happiness|=Anxiety|=Sadness|=Anger
184 -|Statistic|92|49|85|69
185 -|P-value|0.92|0.07|0.71|0.31
186 -
187 187  == Godspeed ==
188 188  
189 189  {{html}}
... ... @@ -221,16 +221,8 @@
221 221  
222 222  In improving the eating, it seems that both robots have limited success in causing the people to eat as seen in Figure 1, they could cause the patients to eat more regularly, if triggered by timers or other suitable systems. It also seems that the advanced robot is better in the reminding, by a slight margin. However, the long term effects of reminding should be researched more to conclude whether the usage of the demonstrated robot platform or similar would cause the patients to eat more regularly. It is also unclear how the test setup and the limited choice of food affected the eating.
223 223  
224 -Based on the answers of the participants regarding music seen in Figure 2, it seems that most of them were either indifferent or liked the music. Also, as the test personnel find the advanced robot more likeable with a 5% confidence limit (Table 7), and the advanced version was the only version with music, it seems likely that the music does make the interaction more pleasant for the personas. However, some of the likeability might be due to the other advanced features of the robot and thus more research is needed to conclude the effect of the music.
225 225  
226 -The EVEA and partial Godspeed result can be seen in Figures 3-7 and Tables 1-7. The results show that with reasonable confidence (5% confidence limit), both versions of the robot decreased sadness and anxiety in the test personas. Hints are shown (10% confidence limit) that the advanced robot also decreases feelings of anger and increases happiness, while the simple robot fails to show similar results. The choice to compare the changes happening during the interaction was to show the
227 227  
228 -A Wilcoxon signed rank test for the partial Godspeed test shows in Table 7 that with high confidence (1% confidence limit), the intelligent robot is more likeable in comparison to the simple robot.
229 -
230 -
231 -
232 -
233 -
234 234  = Discussion =
235 235  
236 236