Changes for page Test
Last modified by Sofia Kostakonti on 2022/04/05 14:08
From version
69.1


edited by Veikko Saikkonen
on 2022/04/01 15:23
on 2022/04/01 15:23
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version
57.1


edited by Veikko Saikkonen
on 2022/04/01 14:26
on 2022/04/01 14:26
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -2,13 +2,11 @@ 2 2 3 3 People with dementia often forget to eat and drink, leading to dehydration, malnutrition and decreased wellbeing in general. Our prototype engages in discourses to remind PwD to have lunch and drink water, using the Nao robot platform. The discourse aims to reming the PwD without causing any anxiety or embarrassment which a traditional "alarm" system could cause, and keep them company throughout these activities. 4 4 5 -RQ1: "Does the robot cause PwD to eat more regularly?" *6 -RQ2: "Does the r obotremindthePwDof their hunger?"7 -RQ3: "Does the music maketheeatingmoreenjoyableforthePwD?"8 -RQ4: "Does the PwD experienceless negativeemotions, such as agitation,sadness,embarrassment,after theinteractionwith the 'intelligent' robot?"5 +RQ1: "Does the robot cause PwD to eat more regularly?" 6 +RQ2: "Does the PwD experience less negative emotions, such as agitation, sadness, embarrassment, after the interaction with the 'intelligent' robot?" 7 +RQ3: "Does the robot remind the PwD of their hunger?" 8 +RQ4: "Does the music make the eating more enjoyable for the PwD?" 9 9 10 -'*' This research question is difficult due to the practical limitations in designing the experimental setup and as such is left to lesser importance. 11 - 12 12 = Method = 13 13 14 14 The prototype is evaluated with an in-person experiment with multiple participants. In the experiment, the participants will be asked to pretend to be PwD and act accordingly with/without the prototype. ... ... @@ -88,8 +88,6 @@ 88 88 89 89 = Results = 90 90 91 -The results were gathered from 19 personnel, all of whom interacted first with one version of the robot and then the other. 10 of the participants interacted first with the simple version, nine having their first interaction with the advanced version. 92 - 93 93 == Eating == 94 94 95 95 {{html}} ... ... @@ -97,28 +97,8 @@ 97 97 {{/html}} 98 98 99 99 (% style="text-align:center" %) 100 -Figure 1: Results on the eating of the test personas during the experiment96 +Figure: Results on the eating of the test personas during the experiment 101 101 102 -Simple robot: 103 - 104 -* 16% ate 105 -* 33% of those would not have eaten without the robot 106 - 107 -Advanced robot: 108 - 109 -* 32% ate 110 -* 67% of those would not have eaten without the robot 111 - 112 -== Music == 113 - 114 -{{html}} 115 -<img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/MusicEnjoyable.png?rev=1.1" alt="Effects of music on the test personnel" style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=1250/> 116 -{{/html}} 117 - 118 -(% style="text-align:center" %) 119 -Figure 2: Answers of the test personas regarding music 120 - 121 - 122 122 == EVEA (Mood) == 123 123 124 124 {{html}} ... ... @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ 126 126 {{/html}} 127 127 128 128 (% style="text-align:center" %) 129 -Figure 3: Median measured moods for the simple version of the robot105 +Figure: Median measured moods for the simple version of the robot 130 130 131 131 {{html}} 132 132 <img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/MoodChangeSmart.png?rev=1.1" alt="Measured moods and changes for the advanced version of the robot" style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=750/> ... ... @@ -133,10 +133,10 @@ 133 133 {{/html}} 134 134 135 135 (% style="text-align:center" %) 136 -Figure 4: Median measured moods for the advanced version of the robot112 +Figure: Median measured moods for the advanced version of the robot 137 137 138 138 (% style="text-align:center" %) 139 -Table 1: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the hypothesis that the mood changed during the interaction with the simple robot115 +Table: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the hypothesis that the mood changed during the interaction with the simple robot 140 140 141 141 |=Mood|=Happiness|=Anxiety|=Sadness|=Anger 142 142 |Statistic|37|5|4|14 ... ... @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ 143 143 |P-value|0.54|0.01|0.01|0.45 144 144 145 145 (% style="text-align:center" %) 146 -Table 2: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the mood changed during the interaction with the advanced robot122 +Table: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the mood changed during the interaction with the advanced robot 147 147 148 148 |=Mood|=Happiness|=Anxiety|=Sadness|=Anger 149 149 |Statistic|32|11|2|17 ... ... @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ 150 150 |P-value|0.18|0.01|0.01|0.45 151 151 152 152 (% style="text-align:center" %) 153 -Table 3: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the mood decreased during the interaction with the simple robot129 +Table: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the mood decreased during the interaction with the simple robot 154 154 155 155 |=Mood|=Anxiety|=Sadness|=Anger 156 156 |Statistic|81|53|29 ... ... @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ 157 157 |P-value|0.01|0.00|0.23 158 158 159 159 (% style="text-align:center" %) 160 -Table 4: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the mood decreased during the interaction with the advanced robot136 +Table: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the mood decreased during the interaction with the advanced robot 161 161 162 162 |=Mood|=Anxiety|=Sadness|=Anger 163 163 |Statistic|32|149|52 ... ... @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ 164 164 |P-value|0.00|0.01|0.07 165 165 166 166 (% style="text-align:center" %) 167 -Table 5: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the mood increased during the interaction with the simple robot143 +Table: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the mood increased during the interaction with the simple robot 168 168 169 169 |=Mood|=Happiness 170 170 |Statistic|37 ... ... @@ -171,12 +171,21 @@ 171 171 |P-value|0.27 172 172 173 173 (% style="text-align:center" %) 174 -Table 6: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the mood increased during the interaction with the advanced robot150 +Table: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the mood increased during the interaction with the advanced robot 175 175 176 176 |=Mood|=Happiness 177 177 |Statistic|32 178 178 |P-value|0.09 179 179 156 +== Music == 157 + 158 +{{html}} 159 +<img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/MusicEnjoyable.png?rev=1.1" alt="Effects of music on the test personnel" style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=1250/> 160 +{{/html}} 161 + 162 +(% style="text-align:center" %) 163 +Figure: Answers of the test personas regarding music 164 + 180 180 == Godspeed == 181 181 182 182 {{html}} ... ... @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ 184 184 {{/html}} 185 185 186 186 (% style="text-align:center" %) 187 -Figure 5: Answers to the statement 'I thought the robot was friendly'172 +Figure: Answers to the statement 'I thought the robot was friendly' 188 188 189 189 {{html}} 190 190 <img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/pleasant-hist.png?rev=1.1" alt="Answers to the statement 'I thought the robot was pleasant'." style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=750/> ... ... @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ 191 191 {{/html}} 192 192 193 193 (% style="text-align:center" %) 194 -Figure 6: Answers to the statement 'I thought the robot was pleasant'179 +Figure: Answers to the statement 'I thought the robot was pleasant' 195 195 196 196 {{html}} 197 197 <img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/godspeed-barchart.png?rev=1.1" alt="Godspeed questionnaire median comparison'." style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=750/> ... ... @@ -198,32 +198,20 @@ 198 198 {{/html}} 199 199 200 200 (% style="text-align:center" %) 201 -Figure 7: Median measured Godspeed questionnaire dimensions186 +Figure: Median measured Godspeed questionnaire dimensions 202 202 203 - 204 -(% style="text-align:center" %) 205 -Table 7: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the advanced robot scored higher in the perceived dimensions 206 - 207 207 |=Dimension|=Likeability|=Intelligence 208 208 |Statistic|36|70 209 209 |P-value|0.01|0.17 210 210 192 +(% style="text-align:center" %) 193 +Table: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the advanced robot scored higher in the perceived dimensions 194 + 211 211 = Conclusions = 212 212 213 -From the results we can see that the more advanced robot shows advantages over the simple version in many categories. Hints of better performance in other categories can be seen, but no conclusions should be drawn from the ones that lack the statistical significance.197 +From the results we can see that the more advanced robot 214 214 215 -In improving the eating, it seems that both robots have limited success in causing the people to eat as seen in Figure 1, they could cause the patients to eat more regularly, if triggered by timers or other suitable systems. It also seems that the advanced robot is better in the reminding, by a slight margin. However, the long term effects of reminding should be researched more to conclude whether the usage of the demonstrated robot platform or similar would cause the patients to eat more regularly. It is also unclear how the test setup and the limited choice of food affected the eating. 216 216 217 -Based on the answers of the participants regarding music seen in Figure 2, it seems that most of them were either indifferent or liked the music. Also, as the test personnel find the advanced robot more likeable with a 5% confidence limit (Table 7), and the advanced version was the only version with music, it seems likely that the music does make the interaction more pleasant for the personas. However, some of the likeability might be due to the other advanced features of the robot and thus more research is needed to conclude the effect of the music. 218 - 219 -The EVEA and partial Godspeed result can be seen in Figures 3-7 and Tables 1-7. The results show that with reasonable confidence (5% confidence limit), both versions of the robot decreased sadness and anxiety in the test personas. Hints are shown (10% confidence limit) that the advanced robot also decreases feelings of anger and increases happiness, while the simple robot fails to show similar results. The choice to compare the changes happening during the interaction was to show the 220 - 221 -A Wilcoxon signed rank test for the partial Godspeed test shows in Table 7 that with high confidence (1% confidence limit), the intelligent robot is more likeable in comparison to the simple robot. 222 - 223 - 224 - 225 - 226 - 227 227 = Discussion = 228 228 229 229