Skip to Content

Changes for page Test

Last modified by Sofia Kostakonti on 2022/04/05 14:08
From version Icon 66.1 Icon
edited by Veikko Saikkonen
on 2022/04/01 14:57
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 63.1 Icon
edited by Veikko Saikkonen
on 2022/04/01 14:54
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -109,17 +109,6 @@
109 109  * 32% ate
110 110  * 67% of those would not have eaten without the robot
111 111  
112 -
113 -== Music ==
114 -
115 -{{html}}
116 -<img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/MusicEnjoyable.png?rev=1.1" alt="Effects of music on the test personnel" style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=1250/>
117 -{{/html}}
118 -
119 -(% style="text-align:center" %)
120 -Figure 4: Answers of the test personas regarding music
121 -
122 -
123 123  == EVEA (Mood) ==
124 124  
125 125  {{html}}
... ... @@ -178,6 +178,15 @@
178 178  |Statistic|32
179 179  |P-value|0.09
180 180  
170 +== Music ==
171 +
172 +{{html}}
173 +<img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/MusicEnjoyable.png?rev=1.1" alt="Effects of music on the test personnel" style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=1250/>
174 +{{/html}}
175 +
176 +(% style="text-align:center" %)
177 +Figure 4: Answers of the test personas regarding music
178 +
181 181  == Godspeed ==
182 182  
183 183  {{html}}
... ... @@ -201,22 +201,19 @@
201 201  (% style="text-align:center" %)
202 202  Figure 7: Median measured Godspeed questionnaire dimensions
203 203  
204 -
205 -(% style="text-align:center" %)
206 -Table 7: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the advanced robot scored higher in the perceived dimensions
207 -
208 208  |=Dimension|=Likeability|=Intelligence
209 209  |Statistic|36|70
210 210  |P-value|0.01|0.17
211 211  
206 +(% style="text-align:center" %)
207 +Table 7: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the advanced robot scored higher in the perceived dimensions
208 +
212 212  = Conclusions =
213 213  
214 214  From the results we can see that the more advanced robot shows advantages over the simple version in many categories. Hints of better performance in other categories can be seen, but no conclusions should be drawn from the ones that lack the statistical significance.
215 215  
216 -In improving the eating, it seems that both robots have limited success in causing the people to eat as seen in Figure 1, they could cause the patients to eat more regularly, if triggered by timers or other suitable systems. It also seems that the advanced robot is better in the reminding, by a slight margin. However, the long term effects of reminding should be researched more to conclude whether the usage of the demonstrated robot platform or similar would cause the patients to eat more regularly. It is also unclear how the test setup and the limited choice of food affected the eating.
213 +In improving the eating, the advanced robot does perform better. While the margin is slight, it would seem that both robots could cause the patients to eat more regularly, if triggered by timers or other suitable systems. It also seems that the advanced robot is better in the reminding, by a slight margin. However, the long term effects of reminding should be researched more to conclude whether the usage of the demonstrated robot platform or similar would cause the patients to eat more regularly.
217 217  
218 -
219 -
220 220  = Discussion =
221 221  
222 222