Skip to Content

Changes for page Test

Last modified by Sofia Kostakonti on 2022/04/05 14:08
From version Icon 64.1 Icon
edited by Veikko Saikkonen
on 2022/04/01 14:54
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 69.1 Icon
edited by Veikko Saikkonen
on 2022/04/01 15:23
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -109,6 +109,16 @@
109 109  * 32% ate
110 110  * 67% of those would not have eaten without the robot
111 111  
112 +== Music ==
113 +
114 +{{html}}
115 +<img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/MusicEnjoyable.png?rev=1.1" alt="Effects of music on the test personnel" style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=1250/>
116 +{{/html}}
117 +
118 +(% style="text-align:center" %)
119 +Figure 2: Answers of the test personas regarding music
120 +
121 +
112 112  == EVEA (Mood) ==
113 113  
114 114  {{html}}
... ... @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@
116 116  {{/html}}
117 117  
118 118  (% style="text-align:center" %)
119 -Figure 2: Median measured moods for the simple version of the robot
129 +Figure 3: Median measured moods for the simple version of the robot
120 120  
121 121  {{html}}
122 122  <img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/MoodChangeSmart.png?rev=1.1" alt="Measured moods and changes for the advanced version of the robot" style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=750/>
... ... @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@
123 123  {{/html}}
124 124  
125 125  (% style="text-align:center" %)
126 -Figure 3: Median measured moods for the advanced version of the robot
136 +Figure 4: Median measured moods for the advanced version of the robot
127 127  
128 128  (% style="text-align:center" %)
129 129  Table 1: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the hypothesis that the mood changed during the interaction with the simple robot
... ... @@ -167,15 +167,6 @@
167 167  |Statistic|32
168 168  |P-value|0.09
169 169  
170 -== Music ==
171 -
172 -{{html}}
173 -<img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/MusicEnjoyable.png?rev=1.1" alt="Effects of music on the test personnel" style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=1250/>
174 -{{/html}}
175 -
176 -(% style="text-align:center" %)
177 -Figure 4: Answers of the test personas regarding music
178 -
179 179  == Godspeed ==
180 180  
181 181  {{html}}
... ... @@ -211,8 +211,18 @@
211 211  
212 212  From the results we can see that the more advanced robot shows advantages over the simple version in many categories. Hints of better performance in other categories can be seen, but no conclusions should be drawn from the ones that lack the statistical significance.
213 213  
214 -In improving the eating, the advanced robot does perform better. While the margin is slight, it would seem that both robots could cause the patients to eat more regularly, if triggered by timers or other suitable systems. It also seems that the advanced robot is better in the reminding, by a slight margin. However, the long term effects of reminding should be researched more to conclude whether the usage of the demonstrated robot platform or similar would cause the patients to eat more regularly.
215 +In improving the eating, it seems that both robots have limited success in causing the people to eat as seen in Figure 1, they could cause the patients to eat more regularly, if triggered by timers or other suitable systems. It also seems that the advanced robot is better in the reminding, by a slight margin. However, the long term effects of reminding should be researched more to conclude whether the usage of the demonstrated robot platform or similar would cause the patients to eat more regularly. It is also unclear how the test setup and the limited choice of food affected the eating.
215 215  
217 +Based on the answers of the participants regarding music seen in Figure 2, it seems that most of them were either indifferent or liked the music. Also, as the test personnel find the advanced robot more likeable with a 5% confidence limit (Table 7), and the advanced version was the only version with music, it seems likely that the music does make the interaction more pleasant for the personas. However, some of the likeability might be due to the other advanced features of the robot and thus more research is needed to conclude the effect of the music.
218 +
219 +The EVEA and partial Godspeed result can be seen in Figures 3-7 and Tables 1-7. The results show that with reasonable confidence (5% confidence limit), both versions of the robot decreased sadness and anxiety in the test personas. Hints are shown (10% confidence limit) that the advanced robot also decreases feelings of anger and increases happiness, while the simple robot fails to show similar results. The choice to compare the changes happening during the interaction was to show the
220 +
221 +A Wilcoxon signed rank test for the partial Godspeed test shows in Table 7 that with high confidence (1% confidence limit), the intelligent robot is more likeable in comparison to the simple robot.
222 +
223 +
224 +
225 +
226 +
216 216  = Discussion =
217 217  
218 218