Skip to Content

Changes for page Test

Last modified by Sofia Kostakonti on 2022/04/05 14:08
From version Icon 62.2 Icon
edited by Veikko Saikkonen
on 2022/04/01 14:54
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 66.1 Icon
edited by Veikko Saikkonen
on 2022/04/01 14:57
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -109,6 +109,17 @@
109 109  * 32% ate
110 110  * 67% of those would not have eaten without the robot
111 111  
112 +
113 +== Music ==
114 +
115 +{{html}}
116 +<img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/MusicEnjoyable.png?rev=1.1" alt="Effects of music on the test personnel" style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=1250/>
117 +{{/html}}
118 +
119 +(% style="text-align:center" %)
120 +Figure 4: Answers of the test personas regarding music
121 +
122 +
112 112  == EVEA (Mood) ==
113 113  
114 114  {{html}}
... ... @@ -167,15 +167,6 @@
167 167  |Statistic|32
168 168  |P-value|0.09
169 169  
170 -== Music ==
171 -
172 -{{html}}
173 -<img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/MusicEnjoyable.png?rev=1.1" alt="Effects of music on the test personnel" style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=1250/>
174 -{{/html}}
175 -
176 -(% style="text-align:center" %)
177 -Figure 4: Answers of the test personas regarding music
178 -
179 179  == Godspeed ==
180 180  
181 181  {{html}}
... ... @@ -199,19 +199,22 @@
199 199  (% style="text-align:center" %)
200 200  Figure 7: Median measured Godspeed questionnaire dimensions
201 201  
202 -|=Dimension|=Likeability|=Intelligence
203 -|Statistic|36|70
204 -|P-value|0.01|0.17
205 205  
206 206  (% style="text-align:center" %)
207 207  Table 7: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the advanced robot scored higher in the perceived dimensions
208 208  
208 +|=Dimension|=Likeability|=Intelligence
209 +|Statistic|36|70
210 +|P-value|0.01|0.17
211 +
209 209  = Conclusions =
210 210  
211 211  From the results we can see that the more advanced robot shows advantages over the simple version in many categories. Hints of better performance in other categories can be seen, but no conclusions should be drawn from the ones that lack the statistical significance.
212 212  
213 -In improving the eating, the advanced robot does perform better. While the margin is slight, it would seem that both robots could cause the patients to eat more regularly, if triggered by timers or other suitable systems. It also seems that the advanced robot is better in the reminding, by a slight margin. However, the long term effects of reminding should be researched more to conclude whether the usage of the demonstrated robot platform or similar would cause the patients to eat more regularly.
216 +In improving the eating, it seems that both robots have limited success in causing the people to eat as seen in Figure 1, they could cause the patients to eat more regularly, if triggered by timers or other suitable systems. It also seems that the advanced robot is better in the reminding, by a slight margin. However, the long term effects of reminding should be researched more to conclude whether the usage of the demonstrated robot platform or similar would cause the patients to eat more regularly. It is also unclear how the test setup and the limited choice of food affected the eating.
214 214  
218 +
219 +
215 215  = Discussion =
216 216  
217 217