Changes for page Test

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -2,11 +2,13 @@
2	2
3	3	People with dementia often forget to eat and drink, leading to dehydration, malnutrition and decreased wellbeing in general. Our prototype engages in discourses to remind PwD to have lunch and drink water, using the Nao robot platform. The discourse aims to reming the PwD without causing any anxiety or embarrassment which a traditional "alarm" system could cause, and keep them company throughout these activities.
4	4
5		-RQ1: "Does the robot cause PwD to eat more regularly?"
6		-RQ2: "Does the PwD experience less negative emotions, such as agitation, sadness, embarrassment, after the interaction with the 'intelligent' robot?"
7		-RQ3: "Does the robot remind the PwD of their hunger?"
8		-RQ4: "Does the music make the eating more enjoyable for the PwD?"
	5	+RQ1: "Does the robot cause PwD to eat more regularly?"*
	6	+RQ2: "Does the robot remind the PwD of their hunger?"
	7	+RQ3: "Does the music make the eating more enjoyable for the PwD?"
	8	+RQ4: "Does the PwD experience less negative emotions, such as agitation, sadness, embarrassment, after the interaction with the 'intelligent' robot?"
9	9
	10	+'*' This research question is difficult due to the practical limitations in designing the experimental setup and as such is left to lesser importance.
	11	+
10	10	= Method =
11	11
12	12	The prototype is evaluated with an in-person experiment with multiple participants. In the experiment, the participants will be asked to pretend to be PwD and act accordingly with/without the prototype.
...	...	@@ -86,6 +86,8 @@
86	86
87	87	= Results =
88	88
	91	+The results were gathered from 19 personnel, all of whom interacted first with one version of the robot and then the other. 10 of the participants interacted first with the simple version, nine having their first interaction with the advanced version.
	92	+
89	89	== Eating ==
90	90
91	91	{{html}}
...	...	@@ -95,6 +95,20 @@
95	95	(% style="text-align:center" %)
96	96	Figure: Results on the eating of the test personas during the experiment
97	97
	102	+|=Version|=Did not eat|=Ate|=Would not have eaten without the robot|\\
	103	+|Simple|16|3|1
	104	+|Advanced|13|6|4
	105	+
	106	+Simple robot:
	107	+
	108	+* 16% ate
	109	+* 33% of those would not have eaten without the robot
	110	+
	111	+Advanced robot:
	112	+
	113	+* 32% ate
	114	+* 67% of those would not have eaten without the robot
	115	+
98	98	== EVEA (Mood) ==
99	99
100	100	{{html}}
...	...	@@ -178,18 +178,29 @@
178	178	(% style="text-align:center" %)
179	179	Figure: Answers to the statement 'I thought the robot was pleasant'
180	180
	199	+{{html}}
	200	+<img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/godspeed-barchart.png?rev=1.1" alt="Godspeed questionnaire median comparison'." style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=750/>
	201	+{{/html}}
181	181
	203	+(% style="text-align:center" %)
	204	+Figure: Median measured Godspeed questionnaire dimensions
182	182
	206	+|=Dimension|=Likeability|=Intelligence
	207	+|Statistic|36|70
	208	+|P-value|0.01|0.17
183	183
	210	+(% style="text-align:center" %)
	211	+Table: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the advanced robot scored higher in the perceived dimensions
184	184
185		-= Discussion =
	213	+= Conclusions =
186	186
	215	+From the results we can see that the more advanced robot
187	187
188	188
189		-= Conclusions =
	218	+= Discussion =
190	190
191		-The experiment showed promising results and encourages more research into the subject.
192	192
	221	+
193	193	= Appendix =
194	194
195	195	== Experiment introduction for participants ==