Changes for page Test

Last modified by Sofia Kostakonti on 2022/04/05 14:08

From version Icon 17.1 Icon
edited by Marlein Vogels
on 2022/03/16 14:16
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 11.1 Icon
edited by Aleksanteri Hämäläinen
on 2022/03/12 19:04
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -XWiki.MarleinVogels
1 +XWiki.ahamalainen
Content
... ... @@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
5 5  RQ1: "Does the robot cause PwD to eat more regularly?"
6 6  RQ2: "Does the PwD experience less negative emotions, such as agitation, sadness, embarrassment, after the interaction with the 'intelligent' robot?"
7 7  RQ3: "Does the robot remind the PwD of their hunger?"
8 -RQ4: "Does the music make the eating more enjoyable for the PwD?"
9 9  
10 10  = Method =
11 11  
... ... @@ -46,7 +46,6 @@
46 46  == Practicalities ==
47 47  
48 48  Beforehand:
49 -
50 50  * Do a practice round by ourselves
51 51  ** Film this
52 52  * Contact other groups and decide on a time slot
... ... @@ -56,7 +56,6 @@
56 56  * Buy snacks
57 57  
58 58  During:
59 -
60 60  1. Give starting questionnare to fill while people are waiting for the previous participant
61 61  2. Guide the participant to the testing spot
62 62  3. Inform the participant where the snacks are
... ... @@ -63,11 +63,10 @@
63 63  4. Run the first version
64 64  5. Give the mid-questionnare
65 65  6. Run the other test
66 -7. Conduct the questionnare for the participant
67 -8. Give the participant the end-questionnare
63 +7. Change the participant in the room, and give the previous participant the end questionnare outside the testing area, to speed up the process
68 68  
69 -Other practicalities during:
70 70  
66 +Other practicalities during:
71 71  * We will use the "Wizard of Oz" method for recognizing agreement and disagreement, to make sure that the whole process does not depend on voice recegnition being good enough
72 72  ** Someone will press eg. "y" and "n" on the keyboard according to the participants answers
73 73  * We will change the order in which the smart and basic versions are for each participant
... ... @@ -74,7 +74,6 @@
74 74  ** this way if someone doesn't show up, we don't get skewed amounts
75 75  
76 76  After:
77 -
78 78  * Analyze results
79 79  
80 80  = Results =
... ... @@ -89,17 +89,6 @@
89 89  
90 90  = Appendix =
91 91  
92 -== Experiment introduction for participants ==
93 -
94 -
95 -
96 -Hi, we are <NAME> and <NAME> from the TU Delft Socio-Cognitive Engeering course Group 1, thank you for participating in our prototype evaluation experiment. The experiment is being conducted as a part of the TU Delft course on Socio-Cognitive Engineering and aims to evaluate the prototype designed as a part of the course. The evaluated prototype is based on the Nao robot-platform and is intended to improve the wellbeing of people suffering of dementia.
97 -
98 -The experiment will last for approximately 15-20 minutes, and consists of two sections, as well as questionnaires before, between and after the sections. We kindly ask you to act naturally during the experiment and fill the questionnaires truthfully. Remember that we are evaluating the prototypes performance, not yours. You can stop the experiment at any time. For the questionnaires, the questions will be short and simple. We ask you to answer the questions intuitively.
99 -
100 -We will be collecting data of the questionnaires and recording some experiments, do you agree with your experiment being recorded? All data excluding the recordings will be anonymised before analysis and storage. The recordings will not be shared with third parties. After the experiment you have the right to ask for information about the collected data and revoke the right to use it. We kindly ask you not to share any information about the experiment with other participants.
101 -
Do you have any questions?
102 -
103 103  == After research interview ==
104 104  
105 105  Setup:
... ... @@ -112,10 +112,13 @@
112 112   - Feeling of company during eating
113 113  - Effectiveness of eating/drinking suggestions
114 114  
115 -Questions:
116 -- Did you eat or drink anything during the experiment?
117 -- Were you feeling hungry/thirsty beforehand and did the discourse change this?
118 -- On a scale of 1-10, how likely would you have eaten/drank without the robot suggesting it?
99 +Guiding questions:
100 +- Did you eat or drink anything?
101 +- Were you feeling hungry/thirsty beforehand?
102 + - Did the discourse change this?
103 +- How likely would you have eaten/drank without the robot suggesting it?
104 + - Scale 1-5
105 +
119 119  - What did the interaction with the robot feel like?
120 120   - With the more intelligent version?
121 121   - With the less intelligent version?