Changes for page Test

Last modified by Sofia Kostakonti on 2022/04/05 14:08

From version Icon 124.3 Icon
edited by Sofia Kostakonti
on 2022/04/05 13:46
Change comment: image change
To version Icon 122.1 Icon
edited by Sofia Kostakonti
on 2022/04/04 20:50
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
64 64  1. 3 hunger and food-related questions of our own, to assess if they eat before or during the interaction (5-point Likert scale)
65 65  1. 2 music-related questions of our own, to measure how much they enjoyed the music and what was its effect (5-point Likert scale)
66 66  
67 -Before the first interaction, the participants were asked to respond to sections 1. and 3., while right after each interaction, they were asked to respond to all four sections, with the music section only present after the advanced interaction. The full questionnaire given to the participants can be found attached.
67 +Before the first interaction, the participants were asked to respond to sections 1. and 3., while right after each interaction, they were asked to respond to all four sections, with the music section only present after the advanced interaction. The full questionnaire given to the participants can be found [[here >> unc:NAO_evaluation.docx ]].
68 68  
69 69  == Practicalities ==
70 70  
... ... @@ -77,7 +77,9 @@
77 77  
78 78  == Eating ==
79 79  
80 -[[image:EatingComp.png]]
80 +{{html}}
81 +<img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/EatingComp.png?rev=1.1" alt="Results on the eating of the test personas" style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=750/>
82 +{{/html}}
81 81  
82 82  (% style="text-align:center" %)
83 83  Figure 1: Results on the eating of the test personas during the experiment
... ... @@ -94,7 +94,9 @@
94 94  
95 95  == Music ==
96 96  
97 -[[image:MusicEnjoyable.png]]
99 +{{html}}
100 +<img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/MusicEnjoyable.png?rev=1.1" alt="Effects of music on the test personnel" style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=1250/>
101 +{{/html}}
98 98  
99 99  (% style="text-align:center" %)
100 100  Figure 2: Answers of the test personas regarding music
... ... @@ -101,13 +101,16 @@
101 101  
102 102  == EVEA (Mood) ==
103 103  
108 +{{html}}
109 +<img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/MoodChangeDumb.png?rev=1.1" alt="Measured moods and changes for the simple robot" style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=750/>
110 +{{/html}}
104 104  
105 -[[image:MoodChangeDumb.png]]
106 -
107 107  (% style="text-align:center" %)
108 108  Figure 3: Median measured moods for the simple version of the robot
109 109  
110 -[[image:MoodChangeSmart.png]]
115 +{{html}}
116 +<img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/MoodChangeSmart.png?rev=1.1" alt="Measured moods and changes for the advanced version of the robot" style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=750/>
117 +{{/html}}
111 111  
112 112  (% style="text-align:center" %)
113 113  Figure 4: Median measured moods for the advanced version of the robot
... ... @@ -163,17 +163,23 @@
163 163  
164 164  == Godspeed ==
165 165  
166 -[[image:friendly-hist.png]]
173 +{{html}}
174 +<img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/friendly-hist.png?rev=1.1" alt="Effects of music on the test personnel" style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=750/>
175 +{{/html}}
167 167  
168 168  (% style="text-align:center" %)
169 169  Figure 5: Answers to the statement 'I thought the robot was friendly'
170 170  
171 -[[image:pleasant-hist.png]]
180 +{{html}}
181 +<img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/pleasant-hist.png?rev=1.1" alt="Answers to the statement 'I thought the robot was pleasant'." style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=750/>
182 +{{/html}}
172 172  
173 173  (% style="text-align:center" %)
174 174  Figure 6: Answers to the statement 'I thought the robot was pleasant'
175 175  
176 -[[image:godspeed-barchart.png]]
187 +{{html}}
188 +<img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/godspeed-barchart.png?rev=1.1" alt="Godspeed questionnaire median comparison'." style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=750/>
189 +{{/html}}
177 177  
178 178  (% style="text-align:center" %)
179 179  Figure 7: Median measured Godspeed questionnaire dimensions
... ... @@ -190,16 +190,16 @@
190 190  
191 191  As described, during the experiment, the interaction between the participants and the robot was observed. This section will elaborate on findings from those observations and quotes from participants.
192 192  
193 -After each interaction section, the participant was asked how the interaction with the robot felt. From the interaction with the simple version of the robot, some interesting quotes were:
206 +After each interaction section, the participant was asked how the interaction with the robot felt. From the interaction with the less intelligent version of the robot, some interesting quotes were:
194 194  
195 -* “The robot was a bit direct.”
208 +* “The robot was bit direct.”
196 196  * “Efficient interaction, but less friendly than the other interaction.”
197 197  * “Strange, I did not catch the questions.”
198 198  * “It felt short.”
199 199  
200 -Some of these quotes stress the fact that the simple prototype interaction was rather short and direct. It should be said that the sequence of the interactions seemed to have some impact on how the participants experienced the interaction. Some participants who first experienced the simple prototype were smiling and positively surprised during this interaction, while others who first experienced the advanced prototype were overall smiling less while interacting with the less intelligent robot.
213 +Some of these quotes stress the fact that the less intelligent prototype interaction was rather short and direct. It should be said that the sequence of the interactions seemed to have some impact on how the participants experienced the interaction. Some participants who first experienced the less intelligent prototype were smiling and positively surprised during this interaction, while others who first experienced the intelligent prototype were overall smiling less while interacting with the less intelligent robot.
201 201  
202 -From the interaction with the advanced version of the robot, some interesting quotes were:
215 +From the interaction with the intelligent version of the robot, some interesting quotes were:
203 203  
204 204  * “I think it’s perfect, the robot is very friendly. I liked that the robot sat down with me after a while.”
205 205  * “The interaction felt quite natural.”
... ... @@ -208,11 +208,11 @@
208 208  * “Very nice, calming, I could have stayed longer with the music.”
209 209  * “It was good, natural, the robot understands what I’m saying.”
210 210  
211 -Some participants clearly expressed how friendly they found the advanced version of the robot. The sequence of the interactions did not seem to impact their feeling about the interaction as much as with the interaction with the simple version of the robot.
224 +Some participants clearly expressed how friendly they found the intelligent version of the robot. The sequence of the interactions did not seem to impact their feeling about the interaction as much as with the interaction with the less intelligent version of the robot.
212 212  Some reported that the interaction felt natural and intuitive.
213 213  As for the music, some participants told us that the music was a useful and pleasant addition to the interaction with the robot.
214 214  As for the suggestion to eat and drink, one participant reported that the suggestions to eat and drink were perhaps too friendly and too subtle.
215 -From our observations, it seemed as if participants were either smiling more during the interaction with the advanced version of the robot or concentrating on the interaction more carefully compared to the interaction with the simple version.
228 +From our observations, it seemed as if participants were either smiling more during the interaction with the intelligent version of the robot or concentrating on the interaction more carefully compared to the interaction with the less intelligent version of the robot.
216 216  
217 217  = Discussion =
218 218