Changes for page Test

Last modified by Sofia Kostakonti on 2022/04/05 14:08

From 122.1 to 121.1 From 124.2 to 124.1

From version

124.1

edited by Sofia Kostakonti
on 2022/04/05 13:42

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

To version

122.1

edited by Sofia Kostakonti
on 2022/04/04 20:50

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Raw
Rendered

Summary

Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
 . 3 hunger and food-related questions of our own, to assess if they eat before or during the interaction (5-point Likert scale)
 . 2 music-related questions of our own, to measure how much they enjoyed the music and what was its effect (5-point Likert scale)
--Before the first interaction, the participants were asked to respond to sections 1. and 3., while right after each interaction, they were asked to respond to all four sections, with the music section only present after the advanced interaction. The full questionnaire given to the participants can be found attached.
++Before the first interaction, the participants were asked to respond to sections 1. and 3., while right after each interaction, they were asked to respond to all four sections, with the music section only present after the advanced interaction. The full questionnaire given to the participants can be found [[here >> unc:NAO_evaluation.docx ]].
  == Practicalities ==
@@ -77,7 +77,9 @@
  == Eating ==
--[[image:EatingComp.png]]
++{{html}}
++<img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/EatingComp.png?rev=1.1" alt="Results on the eating of the test personas" style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=750/>
++{{/html}}
  (% style="text-align:center" %)
  Figure 1: Results on the eating of the test personas during the experiment
@@ -94,7 +94,9 @@
  == Music ==
--[[image:MusicEnjoyable.png]]
++{{html}}
++<img src="https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/download/Test/WebHome/MusicEnjoyable.png?rev=1.1" alt="Effects of music on the test personnel" style="display:block;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" width=1250/>
++{{/html}}
  (% style="text-align:center" %)
  Figure 2: Answers of the test personas regarding music
@@ -199,16 +199,16 @@
  As described, during the experiment, the interaction between the participants and the robot was observed. This section will elaborate on findings from those observations and quotes from participants.
--After each interaction section, the participant was asked how the interaction with the robot felt. From the interaction with the simple version of the robot, some interesting quotes were:
++After each interaction section, the participant was asked how the interaction with the robot felt. From the interaction with the less intelligent version of the robot, some interesting quotes were:
--* “The robot was a bit direct.”
++* “The robot was bit direct.”
  * “Efficient interaction, but less friendly than the other interaction.”
  * “Strange, I did not catch the questions.”
  * “It felt short.”
--Some of these quotes stress the fact that the simple prototype interaction was rather short and direct. It should be said that the sequence of the interactions seemed to have some impact on how the participants experienced the interaction. Some participants who first experienced the simple prototype were smiling and positively surprised during this interaction, while others who first experienced the advanced prototype were overall smiling less while interacting with the less intelligent robot.
++Some of these quotes stress the fact that the less intelligent prototype interaction was rather short and direct. It should be said that the sequence of the interactions seemed to have some impact on how the participants experienced the interaction. Some participants who first experienced the less intelligent prototype were smiling and positively surprised during this interaction, while others who first experienced the intelligent prototype were overall smiling less while interacting with the less intelligent robot.
--From the interaction with the advanced version of the robot, some interesting quotes were:
++From the interaction with the intelligent version of the robot, some interesting quotes were:
  * “I think it’s perfect, the robot is very friendly. I liked that the robot sat down with me after a while.”
  * “The interaction felt quite natural.”
@@ -217,11 +217,11 @@
  * “Very nice, calming, I could have stayed longer with the music.”
  * “It was good, natural, the robot understands what I’m saying.”
--Some participants clearly expressed how friendly they found the advanced version of the robot. The sequence of the interactions did not seem to impact their feeling about the interaction as much as with the interaction with the simple version of the robot.
++Some participants clearly expressed how friendly they found the intelligent version of the robot. The sequence of the interactions did not seem to impact their feeling about the interaction as much as with the interaction with the less intelligent version of the robot.
  Some reported that the interaction felt natural and intuitive.
  As for the music, some participants told us that the music was a useful and pleasant addition to the interaction with the robot.
  As for the suggestion to eat and drink, one participant reported that the suggestions to eat and drink were perhaps too friendly and too subtle.
--From our observations, it seemed as if participants were either smiling more during the interaction with the advanced version of the robot or concentrating on the interaction more carefully compared to the interaction with the simple version.
++From our observations, it seemed as if participants were either smiling more during the interaction with the intelligent version of the robot or concentrating on the interaction more carefully compared to the interaction with the less intelligent version of the robot.
  = Discussion =