Skip to Content

Changes for page Test

Last modified by Sofia Kostakonti on 2022/04/05 14:08
From version Icon 122.1 Icon
edited by Sofia Kostakonti
on 2022/04/04 20:50
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 123.2 Icon
edited by Sofia Kostakonti
on 2022/04/04 20:52
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
64 64  1. 3 hunger and food-related questions of our own, to assess if they eat before or during the interaction (5-point Likert scale)
65 65  1. 2 music-related questions of our own, to measure how much they enjoyed the music and what was its effect (5-point Likert scale)
66 66  
67 -Before the first interaction, the participants were asked to respond to sections 1. and 3., while right after each interaction, they were asked to respond to all four sections, with the music section only present after the advanced interaction. The full questionnaire given to the participants can be found [[here >> unc:NAO_evaluation.docx ]].
67 +Before the first interaction, the participants were asked to respond to sections 1. and 3., while right after each interaction, they were asked to respond to all four sections, with the music section only present after the advanced interaction. The full questionnaire given to the participants can be found attached.
68 68  
69 69  == Practicalities ==
70 70  
... ... @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@
205 205  
206 206  After each interaction section, the participant was asked how the interaction with the robot felt. From the interaction with the less intelligent version of the robot, some interesting quotes were:
207 207  
208 -* “The robot was bit direct.”
208 +* “The robot was a bit direct.”
209 209  * “Efficient interaction, but less friendly than the other interaction.”
210 210  * “Strange, I did not catch the questions.”
211 211  * “It felt short.”