Skip to Content

Changes for page Test

Last modified by Sofia Kostakonti on 2022/04/05 14:08
From version Icon 104.1 Icon
edited by Aleksanteri Hämäläinen
on 2022/04/04 13:31
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 106.1 Icon
edited by Aleksanteri Hämäläinen
on 2022/04/04 13:35
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -157,9 +157,9 @@
157 157  (% style="text-align:center" %)
158 158  Table 3: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the mood decreased during the interaction with the simple robot
159 159  
160 -|=Mood|=Anxiety|=Sadness|=Anger|=-\\
161 -|Statistic|81|53|29|- \\
162 -|P-value|0.01|0.00|0.23|-
160 +|=Mood|=Anxiety|=Sadness|=Anger
161 +|Statistic|81|53|29
162 +|P-value|0.01|0.00|0.23
163 163  
164 164  (% style="text-align:center" %)
165 165  Table 4: Wilcoxon signed rank test results for the null hypothesis that the mood decreased during the interaction with the advanced robot
... ... @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@
260 260  
261 261  A Wilcoxon signed rank test for the partial Godspeed test shows in Table 8 that with high confidence (1% confidence limit), the intelligent robot is more likeable in comparison to the simple robot. With these results it is likely that the more advanced robot is slightly preferrable and the personas might experience less negative emotions after the interaction with the robots, but it is slightly unclear if the effect is more powerful with the advanced robot.
262 262  
263 -Analysis the results surfaced some minor issues in the experiment, such as the lack of comparison with two robots of similar features, with and without music. Also the practical limitations in the setup, such as the lack of different food options and some participants being aware of the design goals of the prototype could have interfered with the natural flow of the intercourse. With these limitations, the research method was successful in extracting differences within the robots and brought up additional directions for future research.
263 +Analysis of the results surfaced some minor issues in the experiment, such as the lack of comparison with two robots of similar features, with and without music. Also the practical limitations in the setup, such as the lack of different food options and some participants being aware of the design goals of the prototype could have interfered with the natural flow of the intercourse. With these limitations, the research method was successful in extracting differences within the robots and brought up additional directions for future research.
264 264  
265 265  The most interesting direction for future research would be the longer term studying of the effect of mealtime reminders on the health of the test subjects. The longer term health study would uncover the effect on eating frequency and the development of the relationship with the robot, for example would the test subjects that were first excited about the novel interaction with the robot, develop negative feelings about the supervision that the robot is conducting into their personal life.
266 266