Changes for page Test

Summary

• Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-XWiki.ahamalainen
	1	+XWiki.VSaikkonen

Content

...	...	@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
51	51	1. Complete questionnaire 3 (extended version).
52	52	1. Have a short interview during downtime (prepared questions).
53	53
	54	+
54	54	We used the "Wizard of Oz" method for recognizing agreement and disagreement, to make sure that the whole process did not depend on voice recognition being good enough. In practice, this meant that someone was pressing "y" and "n" on the keyboard according to the participants answers in a place the participant did not see, such as behind them.
55	55
56	56	== Material ==
...	...	@@ -60,7 +60,6 @@
60	60	Below are listed the contents of the three questionnares:
61	61
62	62	Questionnare 1:
63		-
64	64	* Consent Form and Disclaimers
65	65	* Control for robot version A
66	66	** 8 questions from the [[EVEA>>https://www.ucm.es/data/cont/docs/39-2013-04-19-EVEA%20-%20Datasheet.pdf]] questionnaire
...	...	@@ -67,7 +67,6 @@
67	67	** 4 questions from the [[Godspeed>>https://www.bartneck.de/2008/03/11/the-godspeed-questionnaire-series/]] questionnaire
68	68
69	69	Questionnare 2:
70		-
71	71	* Questions about robot version A
72	72	** 3 food-related questions of our own (5-point Likert scale)
73	73	** 2 music-related questions of our own (5-point Likert scale)
...	...	@@ -76,7 +76,6 @@
76	76	** 4 questions from the [[Godspeed>>https://www.bartneck.de/2008/03/11/the-godspeed-questionnaire-series/]] questionnaire
77	77
78	78	Questionnare 3:
79		-
80	80	* Questions about robot version B
81	81	** 3 food-related questions of our own (5-point Likert scale)
82	82	** 2 music-related questions of our own (5-point Likert scale)
...	...	@@ -222,20 +222,17 @@
222	222	|P-value|0.01|0.17
223	223
224	224	== Qualitative Results: Quotes and observations ==
225		-
226	226	As described, during the experiment, the interaction between the participants and the robot was observed. This section will elaborate on findings from those observations and quotes from participants.
227	227
228		-After each interaction section, the participant was asked how the interaction with the robot felt. From the interaction with the less intelligent version of the robot, some interesting quotes were:
229		-
	225	+After each interaction section, the the participant was asked how the interaction with the robot felt. From the interaction with the less intelligent version of the robot, some interesting quotes were:
230	230	* “The robot was bit direct.”
231	231	* “Efficient interaction, but less friendly than the other interaction.”
232	232	* “Strange, I did not catch the questions.”
233	233	* “It felt short.”
234	234
235		-Some of these quotes stress the fact that the less intelligent prototype interaction was rather short and direct. It should be said that the sequence of the interactions seemed to have some impact on how the participants experienced the interaction. Some participants who first experienced the less intelligent prototype were smiling and positively surprised during this interaction, while others who first experienced the intelligent prototype were overall smiling less while interacting with the less intelligent robot.
	231	+Some of these quotes stress the fact that the less intelligent prototype interaction was rather short and direct. It should be said that the sequence of the interactions seemed to have some impact on how the participants experienced the interaction. Some participants who first experienced the less intelligent prototype were smiling and positively surprised during this interaction, while others who first experienced the intelligent prototype were over all smiling less while interacting with the less intelligent robot.
236	236
237	237	From the interaction with the intelligent version of the robot, some interesting quotes were:
238		-
239	239	* “I think it’s perfect, the robot is very friendly. I liked that the robot sat down with me after a while.”
240	240	* “The interaction felt quite natural.”
241	241	* “Nao answered pretty quickly, you don’t have to wait for an answer. It is quite a happy robot.”
...	...	@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@
245	245
246	246	Some participants clearly expressed how friendly they found the intelligent version of the robot. The sequence of the interactions did not seem to impact their feeling about the interaction as much as with the interaction with the less intelligent version of the robot.
247	247	Some reported that the interaction felt natural and intuitive.
248		-As for the music, some participants told us that the music was a useful and pleasant addition to the interaction with the robot.
	243	+As for the music, some participants told us that the music did was a useful and pleasant addition to the interaction with the robot.
249	249	As for the suggestion to eat and drink, one participant reported that the suggestions to eat and drink were perhaps too friendly and too subtle.
250	250	From our observations, it seemed as if participants were either smiling more during the interaction with the intelligent version of the robot or concentrating on the interaction more carefully compared to the interaction with the less intelligent version of the robot.
251	251
...	...	@@ -275,6 +275,14 @@
275	275
276	276	The long-term effects of this are unclear and require further study. The short-term experiment shows promising results to further develop such solutions, but to also conduct experiments to study the long-term effects of such a solution. With a longer experiment, the development of the human-robot interaction and the effect of constant mealtime reminders would likely begin to show, which could cause differences to the presented short-term results, by for example the robot becoming more enjoyable as it becomes familiar.
277	277
	273	+<ol>
	274	+<li>Does the robot remind the PwD of their hunger?</li>
	275	+<li>Does the music make the eating more enjoyable for the PwD?</li>
	276	+<li>Does the PwD experience less negative emotions, such as agitation, sadness, embarrassment, after the interaction with the 'intelligent' robot?</li>
	277	+<li>* Does the robot cause PwD to eat more regularly?</li>
	278	+</ol>
	279	+
	280	+
278	278	= Appendix =
279	279
280	280	== Experiment introduction for participants ==