Changes for page Design Patterns
Last modified by Sofia Kostakonti on 2022/04/05 14:22
From version 9.1
edited by Marlein Vogels
on 2022/04/03 17:23
on 2022/04/03 17:23
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 10.1
edited by Marlein Vogels
on 2022/04/03 17:26
on 2022/04/03 17:26
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -51,3 +51,23 @@ 51 51 1. Robot salutes PwD and optionally plays “Stop music”. 52 52 This way, the PwD is made aware of the fact that the interaction has finished. 53 53 54 + 55 +== Team design pattern I addition: Caregiver as supervisor == 56 +**Overview** 57 +In the design pattern below, we have updated the previously explained design pattern demonstrates how the caregiver can interfere in the interaction between the robot and the PwD. As the updates are only suggestions, we marked those sections of the design patterns with a dotted line. 58 + 59 +**Purpose** 60 +The purpose of this design pattern is to first show how the caregiver of the PwD could possibly confirm or reject the start of both the UC01 and the UC02. This opportunity could be of use if the caregiver is at home with the PwD and would like to have the mealtime discourse with the PwD his/herself and does not want the robot to have that conversation at that moment. 61 +Secnodly, if UC02 has commenced, another purpose of this updated overview is to show that the caregiver can impact each phase of the UC02 in any step of the interaction of the Robot with the PwD. 62 +One of the advantages of this updated overview, which sees the caregiver as a supervisor of the PwD-Robot interaction, is that the supervisor could also alarm the robot if the PwD is not answering the robot’s questions correctly/truthfully. Also, if the PwD does not know what to answer to the robot’s questions, the supervisor can help the PwD. 63 + 64 +**Steps Breakdown** 65 +//UC Preparation// 66 +1. Robot asks the supervisor if she wants UC01/UC02/neither of the use cases to commence. 67 +1. Supervisor answers the robot’s question. 68 +1. Supervisor could alternatively answer the robot’s question by tapping the robot’s had. 69 +For instance: tapping the robot’s had could represent the stimulation of the start sign for UC01 or UC02. Not tapping the robot’s had within a couple seconds might be the sign for the robot that the robot can commence UC01 or UC02. 70 + 71 +//The supervisor// 72 +This design addition suggestion does not consist of clearly defined steps, but is just intended to demonstrate that the caregiver, as supervisor, could have the opportunity to impact the mealtime reminder interaction between the robot and the PwD. However, in the interaction design patterns, the interaction between the supervisor, the PwD and the robot will be further explained. 73 +