Wiki source code of Measuring Instruments
Version 3.2 by Veikko Saikkonen on 2022/03/01 11:56
Hide last authors
author | version | line-number | content |
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
2.1 | 1 | |
2 | = Frameworks = | ||
3 | |||
4 | == DECIDE == | ||
5 | |||
6 | **D**etermine the goals | ||
7 | - What are the high-level goals? Who wants it and why? The goals influence the approach of the study | ||
8 | |||
9 | **E**xplore the questions | ||
![]() |
3.1 | 10 | - Define the goals and reseach questions |
![]() |
2.1 | 11 | |
12 | **C**hoose evaluation approach and methods | ||
![]() |
3.1 | 13 | - Influences the data collection, analysis and presentation |
14 | - Exploratory research => qualitative data, observational study, | ||
![]() |
2.1 | 15 | |
16 | **I**dentify practical issues | ||
![]() |
3.1 | 17 | - Users, budget, schedule, equipment etc. |
18 | - Pilot study important | ||
![]() |
2.1 | 19 | |
20 | **D**ecide about ethical issues | ||
![]() |
3.1 | 21 | - Adhere to ethical procedure |
22 | - User rights! Explain the goals (before/after), methodology etc. | ||
![]() |
2.1 | 23 | |
24 | **E**valuate, analyze, interpret, present data | ||
![]() |
3.1 | 25 | - Reliable results: Can the results be replicated? |
26 | - Validity: Is the data related to the hypothesis? | ||
27 | - Bias: Are the results unbiased? | ||
28 | - Scope: Can this be generalised? | ||
29 | - Ecological validity: Is the environment influencing the results? | ||
![]() |
2.1 | 30 | |
![]() |
3.1 | 31 | == IMPACT == |
![]() |
2.1 | 32 | |
![]() |
3.1 | 33 | **I**ntention: Present the objectives and claims |
34 | |||
35 | **M**easures and metrics: "What, how and why" | ||
36 | |||
37 | **P**eople: Define the participants | ||
38 | |||
39 | **A**ctivities: Use cases into activities | ||
40 | |||
41 | **C**ontext: Social, ethical, physical, etc. environment definition | ||
42 | |||
43 | **T**echnologies: Hardware and software | ||
44 | |||
45 | |||
![]() |
3.2 | 46 | = Evaluation methods = |
![]() |
3.1 | 47 | |
![]() |
3.2 | 48 | == Formative evaluation == |
49 | |||
50 | - Open ended evaluation on the design | ||
51 | - E.g. How will the users respond to the new design? | ||
52 | |||
53 | |||
54 | == Summative evaluation == | ||
55 | |||
56 | - Focus on the overall effect | ||
57 | - Summarizes if the objective is reached | ||
58 | - E.g. Are the participants happier when working with design X in comparison to design Y? | ||
59 | |||
60 | == Data == | ||
61 | |||
62 | - Qualitative: Explore, discover, instruct | ||
63 | |||
64 | - Quantitative: Describe, explain, predict | ||
65 | |||
66 | - Subjective quantitative | ||
67 | |||
68 | |||
69 | == Statistics == | ||
70 | |||
71 | - Descriptive: Describe the dataset, e.g. mean time on task | ||
72 | - Inferential: Using a sample to infer about a population, e.g. predicted mean time on task based on user characteristics. | ||
73 | |||
74 | == Experiment Design: Conditions == | ||
75 | |||
76 | === Within Subjects (Repeated Measures) === | ||
77 | Each participant is subjected to all the test conditions. | ||
78 | Fewer subjects needed and reduces variance in the Can be difficult to setup due to subjects fatiguing, learning about the setup or simply not having enough time. | ||
79 | |||
80 | === Between Subjects (Between Groups) === | ||
81 | One subject undergoes only one test. Simple to execute, but results in significant variance due to inter-subject differences in characteristics. | ||
82 | |||
83 | |||
84 |