Changes for page Measuring Instruments

Last modified by Sofia Kostakonti on 2022/04/04 12:04

From version Icon 4.19 Icon
edited by Sofia Kostakonti
on 2022/04/03 17:10
Change comment: (Autosaved)
To version Icon 5.1 Icon
edited by Sofia Kostakonti
on 2022/04/03 17:11
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -27,8 +27,7 @@
27 27  When executing an experiment, it is also interesting to examine the interaction from multiple lenses, in order to identify issues and opportunities that are not immediately obvious. That can mean from the perspective of a different stakeholder that is not the main user, other groups that might not directly interact with the system or even a more technical or legal perspective.
28 28  
29 29  
30 -For our study, the process we followed mostly resembles the IMPACT framework since we focused on each of these elements separately and tried to combine them to build our evaluation study. We first defined our research questions and then decided how we could best evaluate them. We decided on a within-subject design and a combination of quantitative and qualitative data. The element of the participants for our study was quite predetermined since we didn't have the access to people with actual dementia, therefore we would use students, peers, and friends to test our hypotheses. By examining our use cases, we thought that the most interesting one we wanted to test was the meal discourse, and consequently, we defined the rest of the aspects regarding the prototype, the experimentation process, and the environment. Our experiment in detail can be found in
31 -( [[//Evaluation// -> //Test// >> https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/view/Test/]])
30 +For our study, the process we followed mostly resembles the IMPACT framework since we focused on each of these elements separately and tried to combine them to build our evaluation study. We first defined our research questions and then decided how we could best evaluate them. We decided on a within-subject design and a combination of quantitative and qualitative data. The element of the participants for our study was quite predetermined since we didn't have the access to people with actual dementia, therefore we would use students, peers, and friends to test our hypotheses. By examining our use cases, we thought that the most interesting one we wanted to test was the meal discourse, and consequently, we defined the rest of the aspects regarding the prototype, the experimentation process, and the environment. Our experiment in detail can be found in the [[//Evaluation// -> //Test// >> https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/sce2022group01/view/Test/]] section.
32 32  
33 33  
34 34  [1] Kurniawan, S. (2004). Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction by Preece, Sharp and Rogers (2001), ISBN 0471492787.