Changes for page Measuring Instruments
Last modified by Sofia Kostakonti on 2022/04/04 12:04
From version
3.1


edited by Veikko Saikkonen
on 2022/03/01 11:46
on 2022/03/01 11:46
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
Details
- Page properties
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -XWiki. VSaikkonen1 +XWiki.SKostakonti - Content
-
... ... @@ -1,46 +1,67 @@ 1 1 2 - =Frameworks=2 +For the evaluation of a prototype, there are several frameworks that can be followed, starting with DECIDE[1]. Decide stands for: 3 3 4 -== DECIDE == 5 - 6 6 **D**etermine the goals 7 -- What are the high-level goals? Who wants it and why? The goals influence the approach of the study 8 - 9 9 **E**xplore the questions 10 -- Define the goals and reseach questions 11 - 12 12 **C**hoose evaluation approach and methods 13 -- Influences the data collection, analysis and presentation 14 -- Exploratory research => qualitative data, observational study, 15 - 16 16 **I**dentify practical issues 17 -- Users, budget, schedule, equipment etc. 18 -- Pilot study important 19 - 20 20 **D**ecide about ethical issues 21 -- Adhere to ethical procedure 22 -- User rights! Explain the goals (before/after), methodology etc. 23 - 24 24 **E**valuate, analyze, interpret, present data 25 -- Reliable results: Can the results be replicated? 26 -- Validity: Is the data related to the hypothesis? 27 -- Bias: Are the results unbiased? 28 -- Scope: Can this be generalised? 29 -- Ecological validity: Is the environment influencing the results? 30 30 11 +First, we would have to determine the high-level goals for the study and the motivation behind them, since they can influence how we approach it. Then, we choose the evaluation approach, the methods that will be used, whether these are based on quantitative or qualitative data, and the process of data collecting, analysis, and presentation. At the same time, any practical issues, such as participants, budget, or schedule, are identified and a pilot study is performed if needed. It is important to adhere to any ethical procedures that are in place, to ensure the participant knows their rights and is protected. Finally, the evaluation of the data takes place, where it is determined whether the results are reliable, valid, without bias, unrelated to the environment and can generalize well. 12 +Another framework used is IMPACT[2]: 31 31 == IMPACT == 32 32 33 33 **I**ntention: Present the objectives and claims 16 +**M**easures and metrics: "What, how, and why" 17 +**P**eople: Define the participants 18 +**A**ctivities: Use cases in activities 19 +**C**ontext: Social, ethical, physical, etc. environment definition 20 +**T**echnologies: Hardware and software 34 34 35 -**M**easures and metrics: "What, how and why" 36 36 37 - **P**eople:Definetheparticipants23 += Evaluation methods = 38 38 39 - **A**ctivities:Usecases intoactivities25 +== Formative evaluation == 40 40 41 -**C**ontext: Social, ethical, physical, etc. environment definition 27 +- Open-ended evaluation of the design 28 +- E.g. How will the users respond to the new design? 42 42 43 -**T**echnologies: Hardware and software 44 44 31 +== Summative evaluation == 45 45 33 +- Focus on the overall effect 34 +- Summarizes if the objective is reached 35 +- E.g. Are the participants happier when working with design X in comparison to design Y? 46 46 37 +== Data == 38 + 39 +- Qualitative: Explore, discover, instruct 40 + 41 +- Quantitative: Describe, explain, predict 42 + 43 + - Subjective quantitative 44 + 45 + 46 +== Statistics == 47 + 48 +- Descriptive: Describe the dataset, e.g. mean time on task 49 +- Inferential: Using a sample to infer about a population, e.g. predicted mean time on task based on user characteristics. 50 + 51 +== Experiment Design: Conditions == 52 + 53 +=== Within Subjects (Repeated Measures) === 54 +Each participant is subjected to all the test conditions. 55 +Fewer subjects needed and reduces variance in the Can be difficult to setup due to subjects fatiguing, learning about the setup or simply not having enough time. 56 + 57 +=== Between Subjects (Between Groups) === 58 +One subject undergoes only one test. Simple to execute, but results in significant variance due to inter-subject differences in characteristics. 59 + 60 + 61 +== Lenses == 62 +- Lense means to take different perspectives looking at your system 63 +- E.g. perspective of the stakeholders, other groups, or technical/legal 64 + 65 + 66 +[1] Kurniawan, S. (2004). Interaction design: Beyond human–computer interaction by Preece, Sharp and Rogers (2001), ISBN 0471492787. 67 +
- XWiki.XWikiComments[0]
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +xwiki:XWiki.FrankBroz - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Don't forget to fill in the specifics of your study. - Date
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2022-03-22 08:33:36.109