Changes for page Aleksanteri Hämäläinen
Last modified by Aleksanteri Hämäläinen on 2022/04/04 13:26
From version 
7.1 
7.1
edited by Aleksanteri Hämäläinen
on 2022/04/03 18:50
on 2022/04/03 18:50
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 4.1
4.1
edited by Aleksanteri Hämäläinen
on 2022/03/08 10:51
on 2022/03/08 10:51
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
Details
-
Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -12,26 +12,4 @@ 12 12 13 13 == Week 3 == 14 14 15 -For this week I worked on the use cases/objective/functions. Our use cases were fairly clear, so formalizing them wasn't too hard. However, during the presentation it was mentioned that our functions/requirements are quite right, so I'll have to take a new look at them. 16 - 17 -== Week 4 == 18 - 19 -This week overall we worked on a lot of finetuning so to say. The demo with the robot, evaluation event, the previously mentioned functions/requirements and so on. I'm still not sure if I have the functions as they should be, but hopefully they are atleast closer. 20 - 21 -== Week 5 == 22 - 23 -On monday we had our first presentation. I'll present in the final presentation, but I helped answering the questions at the end. On tuesday we began finalizing the evaluation, and Litian and I worked specifically on getting the prototype itself working. We did some edits to the conversations paths, and made sure all the sentences made sence for the general evaluation, like not using the name of the persona, making sure the answers made sense for as many possible replies and times as possible, etc. 24 - 25 -== Week 6 == 26 - 27 -This week we started doing the evaluations. Scheduling was a task in itself, but I think we got it working quite well. Especially luckily we got everything sorted out to work at the end of this week and start of next, so we don't need to fight over lab sessions, as many others seem to be doing them at the end of next week. During the presentations Litian and I set up the robot and ran the correct versions for the participants. We also operated the Wizard of Oz control method. Funnily, most of the people didn't realize we were doing that (we were doing it on the side), so we explained to people at the end that our prototypes speech/semantic recognition is not quite so good. 28 - 29 -== Week 7 == 30 - 31 -This week we continued doing evaluations on monday and tuesday. We spent most of monday in the lab, but now we are luckily done and have ample time to do the analysis of the evaluation. 32 - 33 -Later this week I did the quantitative result analysis with Veikko, and Sophia, Veikko and I prepared the final presentation 34 - 35 -== Week 8 == 36 - 37 -Sophia, Veikko and I held the final presentation. After this we split the remaining tasks to complete the report. I did some more revamping of the claims and finished up the evaluation section. 15 +For this week I worked on the use cases/objective/functions. Our use cases were fairly clear, so formalizing them wasn't too hard. However, during the presentation it was mentioned that our functions/requirements are quite right, so I'l have to take a new look at them.