| ... |
... |
@@ -125,10 +125,11 @@ |
| 125 |
125 |
* Ecological validity: The evaluation is partially valid in terms of influence from the environment. The affect assessment questionnaire is the same before and after the activity, with the same environment, so the environment is technically not involved in this. However, the system assessment questionnaire does rely on some elements from the environment. |
| 126 |
126 |
|
| 127 |
127 |
|
| 128 |
|
- |
| 129 |
129 |
= Conclusions = |
| 130 |
130 |
|
| 131 |
|
-The results from the mood questionnaire seem to support our claims CL10: the PwD feels reassured and the PwD feels content. |
|
130 |
+The results from the mood questionnaire seem to support our claims CL001: PwD |
|
131 |
+ |
|
132 |
+ |
| 132 |
132 |
Although there are many potential biases, there seems to be a general trend which is that the mood of the participants slightly improved thanks to the activity. |
| 133 |
133 |
|
| 134 |
134 |
All participants, except one who asked to leave the experiment early, finished the whole activity we had prepared for them during the session. This means the participants were able to perform activity steps told by Pepper. This supports our claim CL03: the PwD performs an activity step. |
| ... |
... |
@@ -138,5 +138,3 @@ |
| 138 |
138 |
From the system assessment questionnaire, participants quite agree that completing the task was a good accomplishment for them. This supports our claim CL08: the PwD feels accomplished. |
| 139 |
139 |
|
| 140 |
140 |
We did not have any question explictly aimed at targeting our claim CL08. However, frustration, annoyance and pressure are often linked to a lack of understanding from the other part. We can combine these with the question about whether Pepper cared about helping the participants, and with our observations during the experiment. When aggregated together, it seems that generally speaking, the participants felt understood. This supports our claim CL08: the PwD feels understood. |
| 141 |
|
- |
| 142 |
|
- |
