Changes for page b. Test

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -65,13 +65,13 @@
65	65	→ reports from relatives and caregiver
66	66	These results will most likely never be yes-no results, but more like clues or hints that show whether some things worked on not, which will be the point of our discussion.
67	67
68		-An example result analysis is below:
	68	+An example result analysis below:
69	69
70	70	**Accomplishment and Autonomy Assessment**
71		-[[image:autonomy.png]]
72		-Figure 1: Graphical representation of results for accomplishment and autonomy subset of the system assessment, with results shown for people who like vs. dislike gardening, along with the average of the sample.
	71	+[[image:E5AE14BC-6F6D-40AD-B774-9EC749FCF37E.png||alt="group2.svg"]]
	72	+Figure 3: Graphical representation of results for accomplishment and autonomy subset of the system assessment, with results shown for people who like vs. dislike gardening, along with the average of the sample.
73	73
74		-The second group, namely the accomplishment and autonomy subset has questions concerning the sense of control and accomplishment felt during the task by the participants. The participants on average responded between slightly agree and agree that completing the task was a good accomplishment and that they felt in control while doing it and a bit lower for the statement "I feel like I have accomplished it myself" suggesting that it is possible for the participants to feel like Pepper is responsible, at least partially, for the accomplishment of the task.
	74	+The second group, namely the accomplishment and autonomy subset has questions concerning the sense of control and accomplishment felt during the task by the participants. The participants on average responded between slightly agree and agree that completing the task was a good accomplishment and that they felt in control while doing it and a bit lower for the statement "I feel like I have accomplished it myself" suggestingthat it is possible for the participants to feel like Pepper is responsible, at least partially, for the accomplishment of the task.
75	75
76	76	====== //H0//: The distribution of answers from people who like gardening and people who do not like gardening is the same. ======
77	77
...	...	@@ -79,15 +79,15 @@
79	79	|=p-value|0.0982|0.220|0.581
80	80	|=statistics|-1.653|-1.224|0.551
81	81
82		-Table 1: Results of Wilcoxon Rank-Sum statistical test on accomplishment and autonomy subset of system assessment for people who like vs. dislike gardening
	82	+Table 4: Results of Wilcoxon Rank-Sum statistical test on accomplishment and autonomy subset of system assessment for people who like vs. dislike gardening
83	83
84		-The sense of accomplishment is slightly higher for people who like gardening than for those who do not. It is globally around slightly agree. An interesting fact to notice is that participants who do not like gardening felt more in control of what they had to do.
	84	+The sense of accomplishment is slightly higher for people who like gardening that for those who do not. It is globally around slightly agree. An interesting fact to notice is that participants who do not like gardening felt more in control of what they had to do.
85	85
86	86	**Negative Experiences Assessment**
87		-[[image:1.png]]
88		-Figure 2: Graphical representation of results for negative experiences subset of the system assessment, with results shown for people who like vs. dislike gardening, along with the average of the sample.
	87	+[[image:CCD77DB3-91F9-440A-8725-7B90CF92FF9F.png]]
	88	+Figure 4: Graphical representation of results for negative experiences subset of the system assessment, with results shown for people who like vs. dislike gardening, along with the average of the sample.
89	89
90		-The third group, namely the negative experiences subset is used to group together questions that measure negative feelings and experiences with Pepper. The results show that the participants on average answered between slightly disagree and disagreed. This suggests that Pepper was not frustrating for most people but only for a small fraction of the participants.
	90	+The third group, namely negative experiences subset is used to group together questions that measure negative feeling experiences with Pepper. The results show that the participants on average answered between slightly disagree and disagreed. This suggests that Pepper was not frustrating for most people but only for a small fraction of the participants.
91	91
92	92	====== //H0//: The distribution of answers from people who like gardening and people who do not like gardening is the same. ======
93	93
...	...	@@ -95,13 +95,13 @@
95	95	|=p-value|0.951|0.358|0.926
96	96	|=statistics|0.0612|0.918|-0.0918
97	97
98		-Table 2: Results of Wilcoxon Rank-Sum statistical test on negative experiences subset of system assessment for people who like vs. dislike gardening
	98	+Table 5: Results of Wilcoxon Rank-Sum statistical test on negative experiences subset of system assessment for people who like vs. dislike gardening
99	99
100	100	The participants globally disagree that the presence of Pepper annoyed, frustrated or pressured them. Those who like gardening actually had a bit more negative feelings regarding the presence of Pepper than those who dislike gardening.
101	101
102	102	**Social Assessment**
103		-[[image:3.png]]
104		-Figure 3: Graphical representation of results for the social subset of the system assessment, with results shown for people who like vs. dislike gardening, along with the average of the sample.
	103	+[[image:CBF52B0D-2992-4C0F-917D-6CAA0AA0EFB4.png]]
	104	+Figure 5: Graphical representation of results for social subset of the system assessment, with results shown for people who like vs. dislike gardening, along with the average of the sample.
105	105
106	106	The fourth and final group addresses a social subset and is utilized for assessing Pepper's social presence and trustworthiness as felt by the participants. The two statements used are "Pepper cared about helping me" and "I would trust Pepper with more important activities". The responses were on average slightly above the neutral level.
107	107
...	...	@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@
111	111	|=p-value|0.854|0.0297
112	112	|=statistics|0.183|-2.173
113	113
114		-Table 3: Results of Wilcoxon Rank-Sum statistical test on the social subset of system assessment for people who like vs. dislike gardening
	114	+Table 5: Results of Wilcoxon Rank-Sum statistical test on social subset of system assessment for people who like vs. dislike gardening
115	115
116	116	This graph shows that the trust in Pepper was highly dependent on whether the participants enjoyed the activity or not.
117	117
...	...	@@ -128,6 +128,7 @@
128	128
129	129	The results from the mood questionnaire seem to support our claims CL001: improved affect of PwD.
130	130
	131	+
131	131	Although there are many potential biases, there seems to be a general trend which is that the mood of the participants slightly improved thanks to the activity.
132	132
133	133	All participants, except one who asked to leave the experiment early, finished the whole activity we had prepared for them during the session. This means the participants were able to perform game steps told by Pepper.
...	...	@@ -136,4 +136,4 @@
136	136
137	137	From the system assessment questionnaire, participants quite agree that completing the group game was a good accomplishment for them.
138	138
139		-Frustration, annoyance and pressure are often linked to a lack of understanding from the other parts. We can combine these with the question about whether Pepper cared about helping the participants, and with our observations during the experiment. When aggregated together, it seems that generally speaking, the participants felt understood.
	140	+Frustration, annoyance and pressure are often linked to a lack of understanding from the other part. We can combine these with the question about whether Pepper cared about helping the participants, and with our observations during the experiment. When aggregated together, it seems that generally speaking, the participants felt understood.